Female models

Post » Tue Mar 29, 2011 6:32 pm

What strikes me odd these days that people can't take games as they are and they try and try to mold those games to their likings.

What I mean is that these are computer games, in which we should be able to escape our ever day lives and just to enjoy.
If as a woman (just like the original poster) you are unable to enjoy a game in which you play characters from opposite six, that indeed makes YOU sixist in turn.

Funny how now days when looking at this issue, men are actually less sixist because we are able to play games with only female characters with no real issue.
Women seem to have major issues most of the time playing a male characters which makes them more sixist
User avatar
Susan Elizabeth
 
Posts: 3420
Joined: Sat Oct 21, 2006 4:35 pm

Post » Tue Mar 29, 2011 6:20 pm

doesnt matter, my response was intended to make the point that im paying full price for the game. so saying its too much work is a poor excuse and basing your entire arguement on it is weak. im not too worried about it but id rather see some (. )( .), ( ; ) than only 8==><==8... :foodndrink:

Well go make your own game since it's so easy.
User avatar
Milad Hajipour
 
Posts: 3482
Joined: Tue May 29, 2007 3:01 am

Post » Tue Mar 29, 2011 3:24 pm

What strikes me odd these days that people can't take games as they are and they try and try to mold those games to their likings.

What I mean is that these are computer games, in which we should be able to escape our ever day lives and just to enjoy.
If as a woman (just like the original poster) you are unable to enjoy a game in which you play characters from opposite six, that indeed makes YOU sixist in turn.

Funny how now days when looking at this issue, men are actually less sixist because we are able to play games with only female characters with no real issue.
Women seem to have major issues most of the time playing a male characters which makes them more sixist


Imo its amazing how much focus is being put on this nowadays... I am baffled, soon game developers HAVE to develop games with ONLY female avatars because, well, guys don't really mind, and girls HAVE TO HAVE a female character to play, anything else would be blasphemy. I get the point, that it would be nice to have female and male avatars in all games, and so on and so forth... There is a time and money issue, as with everything, and the developers will make a choice based on experience and opinion. If gamers don't like that choice they can take their money elsewhere, it can't be that hard. If you really want the game, well then you can look beyond these small issues I would say.
User avatar
Tikarma Vodicka-McPherson
 
Posts: 3426
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 9:15 am

Post » Tue Mar 29, 2011 11:46 pm

Hey hey hey......CoD is a great game....blah blah freakin blah


Oh wow,another CoD fan-boy....You gotta admit,Black Ops was a peice of junk,and it was a waste of money for me,the story was way too short! I just wasn't really into it,the story didnt grab me,and i still hate playing CoD online because of a reason that will be stated below...And no,I am not a CoD hater,I loved MW2 and I am buying MW3 when it comes out...I think BRINK will be better then Black Ops,because BRINK is a NEW type of gaming,a NEW type of controls,and just plain awesome.

...Play the objective based game with a group and dominate kids all night. THAT is good ole fashion fun.....blah blah and yet another blah I


Really? That is why I hate CoD online! People screaming,people saying hacker,people say bastard,people calling you names I couldn't even imagine,when I play online,I work as a team,I dont scream,and I apologize when I do something wrong,let's say(as some random number) 8 million people play CoD,around 100,000 of those aren't whiny little(sometimes fat,so big too) snot-filled body bags.And if your one of them,then you won't be dissing not-professional kids that just want to have fun,you wouldn't be dissing a game that has potential either!

The game is short....



As short as CoD Black Ops's story?íit took my like 2 hours to complete it,and I'm not that great of a gamer


Ofcourse this is all my opinion.


Why yes it is,my friend,yes it is!


If you aren't a CoD really devoted fan,alright,well then I apologize for not realizing you are just some guy ripping off a new game,Congrats! You got an "apology" from me!Good job,you peice of wheat
User avatar
Robert Garcia
 
Posts: 3323
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2007 5:26 pm

Post » Tue Mar 29, 2011 4:04 pm

Not really.

Release the game now or delay to support the very minority of gaming crowd? From a business standpoint, the answer is clearer then a Mr Cleaned window. Some might say the window wasn't even there it was so clear.


from a recent ESA survey - http://www.gamasutra.com/php-bin/news_index.php?story=17699 "A new report by the Entertainment Software Association (ESA) claims that 38 percent of all gamers are female, with the average female gamer spending 7.4 hours per week playing games." Now granted the types of games that the survey finds that women enjoyed playing tended to lead away from the hardcoe crowd, but still 38% of all gamers is nothing to scoff at from a business perspective.
User avatar
Queen
 
Posts: 3480
Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2006 1:00 pm

Post » Tue Mar 29, 2011 10:32 pm

There are bigger problems in the game than lack of female models.
User avatar
Rudi Carter
 
Posts: 3365
Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2006 11:09 pm

Post » Wed Mar 30, 2011 8:31 am

I really do agree with that lack of male investment in the characters we play. It's just really not that important that you play your gender if it's going to get in the way of the story. Yes you could argue that we have had male characters since the early days of video games and as such playing as a female character doesn't phase us for a good reason, but it seems more and more that there is a very small, very loud group of female gamers who see the need to make every video game forum their own sixism soapbox.

The reason why you don't see female characters in games with excessive violence and gunplay is because women have never been allowed near these situations in any military sense. Yes women enroll in the military every day, but never into frontline combat roles, they aren't allowed. It's for many reasons but the two biggest ones are that:

A ) Women are physically much much weaker than men and this puts them at a distinct tactical disadvantage that would be silly to encourage. It's not sixism, it's basic biology.

B ) Any country or organisation that belongs to the human race has a natural and culturally enforced aversion to putting the bearers of our offspring in the line of any overt danger in a big way. It's not great for the future of the species to have women being shot at and melee attacked.

The last government-run security force in a world where the human race is on the BRINK (see what they did there?) of extinction just wouldn't allow it. And as such you would only be able to have female characters on the resistance team, a move that would create even more complaints no doubt. I don't think the resistance would be too keen on their wives and mothers being shot at either.

And that's all story based reasons, I haven't even mentioned the technical reasons behind female characters being far more risk than gain in the development phase. And even if they did put them in, feminists would complain about the proportions of their bodies being "unrealistic". You're right, they are unrealistic, because it's NOT. REAL.
User avatar
Eric Hayes
 
Posts: 3392
Joined: Mon Oct 29, 2007 1:57 am

Post » Wed Mar 30, 2011 2:41 am

A ) Women are physically much much weaker than men and this puts them at a distinct tactical disadvantage that would be silly to encourage. It's not sixism, it's basic biology.


Much weaker? Yeah there are biological difference between sixes but it's more about how much muscle mass they can achieve in the end, not general strength.

B ) Any country or organisation that belongs to the human race has a natural and culturally enforced aversion to putting the bearers of our offspring in the line of any overt danger in a big way. It's not great for the future of the species to have women being shot at and melee attacked


Actually women serving in front line combat roles is much more common in South America and eastern Asia, with a few other places littered in between, especially in guerrilla warfare (which Brink would fall under). There are female Columbian soldiers who could rip through any other soldier.

Also, in reference to not wanting to send child bearers into combat seeing as how it might negatively impact the future of the species: the Ark is already ten times over populated. They are not scrapping for numbers.

And your last bit is just speculation, really. So... meh...
User avatar
Andrea P
 
Posts: 3400
Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2007 7:45 am

Post » Wed Mar 30, 2011 3:28 am

from a recent ESA survey - http://www.gamasutra.com/php-bin/news_index.php?story=17699 "A new report by the Entertainment Software Association (ESA) claims that 38 percent of all gamers are female, with the average female gamer spending 7.4 hours per week playing games." Now granted the types of games that the survey finds that women enjoyed playing tended to lead away from the hardcoe crowd, but still 38% of all gamers is nothing to scoff at from a business perspective.


my mrs loves her games. can she handle FPS... nope. she doesnt like them. she will be happy playing motorstorm apocalypse right now!
User avatar
Benji
 
Posts: 3447
Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 11:58 pm

Post » Wed Mar 30, 2011 8:16 am

Much weaker? Yeah there are biological difference between sixes but it's more about how much muscle mass they can achieve in the end, not general strength.



Actually women serving in front line combat roles is much more common in South America and eastern Asia, with a few other places littered in between, especially in guerrilla warfare (which Brink would fall under). There are female Columbian soldiers who could rip through any other soldier.

Also, in reference to not wanting to send child bearers into combat seeing as how it might negatively impact the future of the species: the Ark is already ten times over populated. They are not scrapping for numbers.

And your last bit is just speculation, really. So... meh...


The Ark is a tiny island. It IS overpopulated but concentration doesn't equate to overall numbers. The human race is essentially over. For the sake of genetic diversity, any right-minded governing body would want to keep as many women and children alive as possible in the hope that there would be land somewhere in which they can begin anew. As for the muscle mass thing, it takes women significantly more work over a longer period of time to achieve the same muscularity as men doing half that. Women can definitely fill a role in the battlefield but carrying a massive chaingun while sprinting down escalators is not one of them. Hell, it's a stretch to have even giant men doing these things!

Whenever you see women in games like this (Gears of War 3 is a great and very recent example), you are seeing developers answering the call of the aforementioned female minority harassing them to let us chainsaw women in two as well. Anya had a very believable and pivotal role in Gears of War 1 & 2, but now I can't take her seriously because she's stomping the heads off subterranean monsters with biceps as big as motorcycles. It's ridiculous. It doesn't fit. Not every game is out there to make gender commentary and they should definitely not be attacked for including more or less of any particular gender if it doesn't make sense to do the opposite.

It's not very progressive, no, but sometimes the truth isn't always going to be an answer you want to hear.
User avatar
Kelsey Hall
 
Posts: 3355
Joined: Sat Dec 16, 2006 8:10 pm

Post » Wed Mar 30, 2011 6:15 am

This whole "sixism" thing is really starting to piss me off....sorry but its true =/

Every day theres the same threads. I have many many views on this some supportive and some not but I cba to go into them because 1) Ive done it before and 2) It would start an arguement most likely.

Im all for strong female characters...but as soon as the waah waah starts I couldnt care less about you or your views.

(yes Im in a bad mood at the time of writing this)
User avatar
Kayla Keizer
 
Posts: 3357
Joined: Tue Dec 12, 2006 4:31 pm

Post » Tue Mar 29, 2011 6:31 pm

Its like adding females characters in CoD, its pointless
User avatar
Alycia Leann grace
 
Posts: 3539
Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2007 10:07 pm

Post » Tue Mar 29, 2011 7:48 pm

The Ark is a tiny island. It IS overpopulated but concentration doesn't equate to overall numbers. The human race is essentially over. For the sake of genetic diversity, any right-minded governing body would want to keep as many women and children alive as possible in the hope that there would be land somewhere in which they can begin anew. As for the muscle mass thing, it takes women significantly more work over a longer period of time to achieve the same muscularity as men doing half that. Women can definitely fill a role in the battlefield but carrying a massive chaingun while sprinting down escalators is not one of them. Hell, it's a stretch to have even giant men doing these things!

Whenever you see women in games like this (Gears of War 3 is a great and very recent example), you are seeing developers answering the call of the aforementioned female minority harassing them to let us chainsaw women in two as well. Anya had a very believable and pivotal role in Gears of War 1 & 2, but now I can't take her seriously because she's stomping the heads off subterranean monsters with biceps as big as motorcycles. It's ridiculous. It doesn't fit. Not every game is out there to make gender commentary and they should definitely not be attacked for including more or less of any particular gender if it doesn't make sense to do the opposite.

It's not very progressive, no, but sometimes the truth isn't always going to be an answer you want to hear.


5000 is more than enough bio-diversity to keep the species going, you're better off having a few women and children dying then your entire population dying of malnutrition and dehydration.

No one is asking for all women to be carrying chainguns doing parkour off two stories, but the body type template is just as applicable. As a male are you physically competent enough to do half the things in this game? I'm guessing no, because this is a work of fiction in a highly romanticized world. Your blanket assumptions on six is lacking.

To add on to that: you can hold your disbelief in stomping motorcycle sized intelligent alien life but you draw the line if it's a woman? lolololol
User avatar
Skivs
 
Posts: 3550
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2007 10:06 pm

Post » Wed Mar 30, 2011 7:21 am

Much weaker? Yeah there are biological difference between sixes but it's more about how much muscle mass they can achieve in the end, not general strength.



Actually women serving in front line combat roles is much more common in South America and eastern Asia, with a few other places littered in between, especially in guerrilla warfare (which Brink would fall under). There are female Columbian soldiers who could rip through any other soldier.

Also, in reference to not wanting to send child bearers into combat seeing as how it might negatively impact the future of the species: the Ark is already ten times over populated. They are not scrapping for numbers.

And your last bit is just speculation, really. So... meh...


go check world records for any *physical* sport. womens times are lower than mens. weights, speed, endurance, height etc etc.

what you say is like someone saying 'oh a black bear isnt stronger it just has more muscle'

i can see you will not let it lie but you cant deny the fact that men are generally stronger and bigger than women. i would also like to see some little columbian women take on someone from ther SAS etc.
User avatar
Zosia Cetnar
 
Posts: 3476
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 6:35 am

Post » Wed Mar 30, 2011 1:35 am

Don't be picking fights with one another in here or making personal attacks on one another because your opinion differs. You may debate an idea but you may not attack one another.

'tis alright to disagree. ;)
User avatar
Amber Ably
 
Posts: 3372
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2007 4:39 pm

Post » Wed Mar 30, 2011 9:08 am

I don't have to tell you to ignore the d*uchey replies shelly.

Yes, they should have included female models and they could have if they didn't waste time arguing over the art direction.

And it that doesn't even matter now seeing as how the game is buggy as hell on release.

I thought maybe you girls can start a petition to make SD release a female model DLC but they got a lot to do to fix the base game first.


Calling people's comments "d*uchey" and not having a clue about the topic? Priceless.

For everyone else that hasn't fallen into the pit of ignorance yet, feel free to search the forums, there was a megathread explaining why there are no female models.
User avatar
Kira! :)))
 
Posts: 3496
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 1:07 pm

Post » Wed Mar 30, 2011 2:28 am

Why dont they have children models either? I am sure there could of been child soldiers on the Ark for the resistance. Also why didn't they let you be a Tranny, I am sure there are plenty of Trannys that play games. And on that note why didn't they let you be an Orc, I mean so many other games are doing it, so why didn't Splash Damage do it?
User avatar
Emily Jeffs
 
Posts: 3335
Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2006 10:27 pm

Post » Tue Mar 29, 2011 7:31 pm

This one is done. Time to get out the whooping compound.

No more of these threads for a few days until we can discuss it in a mature manner.
User avatar
quinnnn
 
Posts: 3503
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 1:11 pm

Previous

Return to Othor Games