So... you don't want it to add brand new lands, you want it to add on to story within existing lands? And Fallout 3 got it right? Zeta was in space, Anchorage was a brand new map, The Pitt, brand new maps, Broken Steel happened mostly in the airforce base which was brand new, and Point Lookout was a brand new map... So all 5 of them added new maps and little to the existing one.
But I get what you mean. I'm not exactly sure what the point of this thread is. You want DLC that adds items and crap to the game? Honestly, I hate those. I don't like spending even 1$ for some items or something, those are a lame way to make quick cash. And if your saying you want new items AND new quests, your pretty saying you want what they will probably do... So... :confused:
no, thats not even close to what I said. I didn't say I did not want DLC's to add new areas, the guy in the OXM podcast said that they would not be adding any large new landmasses in any DLC for Skyrim.
So I sugested they use that extra space they'll have to add new content to the game, and not necessarily exclusively weapons and armor. I was just pointing out that OB's DLC did not add to many of those and DLC's would be a good oportunity to add in the things that massive amounts of people want but bethesda can't add into the vanilla due to time constraints.
I like new areas added with the DLC's, but if they are saying they are not going to do that as much as previously they may as well use that as an oportunity to add in other stuff.