CHIM and The Godhead

Post » Wed May 25, 2011 8:33 am

I've been reading a bit of the TES Lore, considering myself quite a fan.
But there are a few things that I don't understand...
What is the Godhead exactly? And what does it mean to obtain CHIM?
I'm sure this question has been asked a thousand times, but due to the quite lacking uesp.net site, I find it hard to figure out.

- Zabamund
User avatar
Crystal Birch
 
Posts: 3416
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 3:34 pm

Post » Wed May 25, 2011 1:13 pm

Have a look http://www.gamesas.com/index.php?/topic/1159627-what-is-chim-when-is-it-mentioned, been a while since I read the thread fully but it definitely contains some suggestions for reading material and some use full info.
Also in http://www.gamesas.com/index.php?/topic/1112211-how-to-become-a-lore-buff/ under Religion and Mythology.
Hope it helps don't know much myself so I'm not even going to try to give you a nice crisp summary I'll leave that to the experts.
User avatar
Jodie Bardgett
 
Posts: 3491
Joined: Sat Jul 29, 2006 9:38 pm

Post » Wed May 25, 2011 4:40 pm

I'm sure this question has been asked a thousand times

And on the 8th day, Todd created the search function.

The http://imperial-library.info/content/loveletter-fifth-era-true-purpose-tamriel and http://imperial-library.info/content/vehks-teaching are probably the two best texts for these topics.
User avatar
no_excuse
 
Posts: 3380
Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2006 3:56 am

Post » Wed May 25, 2011 7:55 am

I'll have a look at it!
Thanks :)
User avatar
mishionary
 
Posts: 3414
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 6:19 am

Post » Wed May 25, 2011 5:49 pm

Still though, while CHIM has been discussed to death, I think it's helpful to continue discussing Godhead, as it's very present in modern religion in a simple enough form, but in TES it's a very vague concept.

To say that Lorkhan/Akatosh/(Alduin maybe? Just pulling that out my ass) come together to form a Godhead is deceiving in my opinion.

Godhead in TES is more of an All-in-one idea that stretches beyond any single god and/or mantled pairings of gods or entities. To me, it seems almost like a sort of Ether. I.e. we don't know what the mechanism behind it is, but we do know that it exists, and that it is everywhere.

I could very well be wrong though, and Godhead could just refer to any forming of multiple entities being a part of the whole, but then again, that's why we have enatiomorph. I'll stand by my Above-All-and-All-Encompassing theory though.
User avatar
Sierra Ritsuka
 
Posts: 3506
Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 7:56 am

Post » Wed May 25, 2011 6:40 pm

Godhead is transcendent intelligence; or a human cognizance, escaped from the shell of body and mundane limit.* The moons and the sun are symbols inviting mortals to CHIM.


*2001's trippy scene and the starchild. Mundus is an invitation to an awakening.
User avatar
Laurenn Doylee
 
Posts: 3427
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 11:48 am

Post » Wed May 25, 2011 7:48 am

I'll find an excellent post that was made recently that attempts to describe CHIM and (I believe) is a fantastic description.

The Godhead doesn't seem to have been explored a great deal. It can different meanings and I admit I hadn't heard the term before TES. If you google the term Godhead you'll get reference for it in different religions and it can be an interesting, if confusing read.

It seems to mean the totality of divinity.

In TES terms it could be the entity from which all other god's/divinity comes from; it could be the combined divinity from the various gods; or it could mean something more literal :P

I like to think that the TES universe is the nature of the GREY MAYBE the very essence of belief being able to make something of nothing or unmake everything; to make something new now such that it always was or remove it in the future such that it never existed.

The Godhead is then the totality of all of the people, Gods, beliefs, history, and possiblity. Every belief is both right and wrong all at once and that's how we end up with the conflicting gods of multiple religions all able to exist. Make sense?
User avatar
Elea Rossi
 
Posts: 3554
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 1:39 am

Post » Wed May 25, 2011 7:48 am

(It's been a long time since I posted anything in the lore forum because of how unpleasant my last visit was (mostly due to the topic of CHIM), so if you have anything to say about my post, then please do so in a polite manner, please :) )


I think everything boils down to the good ol' subject of subjective vs. objective view of the universe (that's what it's called if I'm not mistaken).
If you are a writer (the objective viewer), you know everything about the story you are writing, and time within the story you're writing has no effect on you at all in the real world. If you write that a character does a certain thing, then that character will always have done that thing at that time; and if you replace that action, that character will always have done the new thing at that time instead. If you replace a name on page 1, the former name is just gone.
If you are a character in this story (the subjective viewer), everything depends on the writer. You live in whatever form of time the writer has decided exists in your world, and you do whatever the writer writes you are doing; yet you will perceive it as free will, because there is no way for you to experience the changes being forced onto you by someone with an objective view of your universe. If the writer has changed the name on page one, the name will always have been that name. The former name has never existed. If the writer changes what you did 10 minutes ago, that will always have been the case. Your previous action never existed in anyone's mind except for the writer's.

Now, if we apply this to TES; the writer in the previous example isn't a writer, but a god who's sleeping, and the story is his dream. This god happens to be mad, and the dream is quite lucid. The dream has (in a subjective view) been going on for an extremely long time, and the god has started to love his "creation".
I don't think that anyone can achieve CHIM on his/her own; I believe CHIM is what you achieve when the dreaming god fancies your actions and is beginning to identify with you in an extreme way due to his madness; thus, as time goes on, you become more like the dreamer/the dreamer becomes more like you until you have joined him in dreaming through what you perceive as your own actions subjectively, whereas the original dreamer has, piece by piece, been merging with you and through his "objective powers" he's been guiding you (and, perhaps unknowingly, changing himself to become you as well).
So, basically, I believe that CHIM is what you achieve when the dreamer thinks you're a pretty cool guy, and is more or less intrigued by/jealous of you.
Breaking out of a subjective world view is impossible on your own (you can liken this to being the character in a story and somehow becoming the writer; impossible). The key ingredient is that the writer is insane and starts identifying so much with your character that eventually, he will be you and you will be him (sorta like the movie "23" with Jim Carrey, if I remember correctly?).
The "retaining the 'I'" part that is oh-so-important is simply that you as a character in the story always has to care about the story and loving it (and yourself, considering you are part of it) as much as the dreamer who created it; thus always wanting to be a part of it and your "subjective self" (keyword: love).

When you drag this out of the TES universe and into this universe, I believe Bethesda is the dreamer and TES is the dream. I guess MK stands for the insane part of the dreamer, eh? :laugh:
(But seriously, though, MK roleplaying as Vivec in "Trial of Vivec" is practically how Vivec has CHIM. When roleplaying, you are your character and vice-versa; and considering MK is part of writing the MW story he is the dreamer, Vivec is MK and they are the writer at that point).


My two cents, they were. And, as I said in the beginning; if you want to discuss a part of it then DISCUSS it, don't bicker and argue. I got enough of that last time.


(Also, at time of posting it is the 11th of April 2011, making it 6 years since I joined the forums. Go me!)

User avatar
Teghan Harris
 
Posts: 3370
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 1:31 pm

Post » Wed May 25, 2011 3:58 pm

The entire thread that quote came from had really good discussion on the Godhead, but M'aiq's post was exceptionally comprehensive and comprehensible.
User avatar
Sammie LM
 
Posts: 3424
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 1:59 pm

Post » Wed May 25, 2011 9:21 pm

Am I the only one who doesn't like Bethesda = Godhead? It cheapens it for me, and doesn't really help my understanding.
User avatar
Nice one
 
Posts: 3473
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 5:30 am

Post » Wed May 25, 2011 9:24 pm

Am I the only one who doesn't like Bethesda = Godhead? It cheapens it for me, and doesn't really help my understanding.

Eh, I used to think like this too, but to be honest, the GH, and CHIM (well maybe not so much with CHIM), can all be pretty much ignored. While they're big, overarching theories, if you don't like the thought of them, just ignore them. That's what I usually do.
User avatar
Sunnii Bebiieh
 
Posts: 3454
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 7:57 pm

Post » Wed May 25, 2011 9:47 pm

Eh, I used to think like this too, but to be honest, the GH, and CHIM (well maybe not so much with CHIM), can all be pretty much ignored. While they're big, overarching theories, if you don't like the thought of them, just ignore them. That's what I usually do.


I like CHIM and the Godhead. I just don't like equating it with Bethesda. I prefer to think of the Godhead as being the insane dreaming Godhead.
User avatar
Arrogant SId
 
Posts: 3366
Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 11:39 am

Post » Wed May 25, 2011 7:55 pm

No, Bethesda isn't a transcendent intelligence, but M'aiq made an anology, which isn't exactly an equation, is it?
User avatar
Matthew Warren
 
Posts: 3463
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2007 11:37 pm

Post » Wed May 25, 2011 9:32 pm

No, Bethesda isn't a transcendent intelligence, but M'aiq made an anology, which isn't exactly an equation, is it?


No. I have seen some others equate them though. I was talking about the equation in general, not a specific post.
User avatar
ZzZz
 
Posts: 3396
Joined: Sat Jul 08, 2006 9:56 pm

Post » Wed May 25, 2011 7:21 am

I quite like this writer/character anology.

By that logic, I would say the Elder Scrolls are a metacognititive wall between the gods and Mundus.

A Moth Priest then, could be cognizant of changes to the story the gods make, aware of the existential contradictions. Just like if someone started fundamentally changing things, like lets say... oh making a jungle a deciduous forest, a moth priest could remember the jungle when no one else would. It would be like peering into the writer's, the gods' mind. After awhile, there would be too many contradictions, and like the rewritten parts of the world, the moth priest would cease to exist, aka Zero Sum.
User avatar
stacy hamilton
 
Posts: 3354
Joined: Fri Aug 25, 2006 10:03 am

Post » Wed May 25, 2011 4:29 pm

Isn't the Godhead comparable in some ways to God in RL religions? I mean he exists before everything, he 'dreams' the universe into existance and he exists everywhere at the same time. Even Anu and Pandomay exist only as his thoughts or dreams. So he apears to have the highest level of divinity in TES. Also viewing It as gamesas is I think very simplistic. If looking from that point of view the Godhead could be viewed as the sum of thoughts and actions that created TES. Or the concept of TES. Or the CS with Anu and Pandomay being the binary system. A interesting thing to know is what happens when one reaches CHIM? Does he become the Godhead? Does one mantle the Godhead that way? Or does one escape the Godheads dream? Or he becomes a divine being conected with the godhead and as such higher than the aedra and daedra and on the same plane with Anu? And how does one maintain his state of CHIM without Zerosuming? And by that I mean how can one other than the Godhead maintain his identity while being in a state if CHIM?
User avatar
Trevor Bostwick
 
Posts: 3393
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2007 10:51 am

Post » Wed May 25, 2011 12:55 pm

Isn't the Godhead comparable in some ways to God in RL religions? I mean he exists before everything, he 'dreams' the universe into existance and he exists everywhere at the same time. Even Anu and Pandomay exist only as his thoughts or dreams. So he apears to have the highest level of divinity in TES. Also viewing It as gamesas is I think very simplistic. If looking from that point of view the Godhead could be viewed as the sum of thoughts and actions that created TES. Or the concept of TES. Or the CS with Anu and Pandomay being the binary system. A interesting thing to know is what happens when one reaches CHIM? Does he become the Godhead? Does one mantle the Godhead that way? Or does one escape the Godheads dream? Or he becomes a divine being conected with the godhead and as such higher than the aedra and daedra and on the same plane with Anu? And how does one maintain his state of CHIM without Zerosuming? And by that I mean how can one other than the Godhead maintain his identity while being in a state if CHIM?

The Godhead is everything. CHIM is realizing this (and the implication that YOU are everything), and still being able to operate as an individual entity. Zerosumming is realizing that the Godhead is everything and not realizing that doesn't mean that you are nothing.
The realization that everything is you and that you are one with everything gives you godlike omnipotence; as you can control everything in the manner that you would control yourself, simply by an extension of will. Zerosum is gaining that power and erasing the individual you from existence by not maintaining a sense of self. If "you" are everything and control everything, but don't remember that there IS a "you", then you're gone.
CHIM isn't true omnipotence however, because "truth resembles water with its trembling", and the realization is elusive and difficult to keep a hold on.
You aren't mantling the Godhead; mantling refers exclusively to taking on the role (the mantle) of a member of the enantiomorph and mimicking convention.
You don't escape the dream, you're one with it.


Caveat: This might be a completely erroneous explanation.
User avatar
Sabrina Schwarz
 
Posts: 3538
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 10:02 am

Post » Wed May 25, 2011 7:04 pm

I don't know if to suggest that the bethesda=godhead lends itself to the deus ex machina concept is unfair but I would be dissapointed if the bethesda=godhead construct were true.

I instead read 'that part' of M'aiq's post as an anology that helps explain a complex concept in a way that most of us can start to understand. You can stop reading his post before he tries to explain the concept in our universe and it's still an exceptional post for the layman like me.

I believe that the TES lore is intentionally ambiguous. It means we have the freedom to guess and theorise and we can neither be wrong, nor right; or we're always wrong and always right until someone says otherwise.
User avatar
Project
 
Posts: 3490
Joined: Fri May 04, 2007 7:58 am

Post » Wed May 25, 2011 3:42 pm

You don't escape the dream, you're one with it.


Well not with CHIM you don't.
User avatar
lolli
 
Posts: 3485
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2007 10:42 am

Post » Wed May 25, 2011 8:31 am

The whole godhead dreamer talk does not make any sense whatsoever to me...


I can understand saying that the godhead has a dual nature,..afterall almost everything in the universe has a positive and a negative aspect

However saying the godhead is mad is pure hogwash
User avatar
Jessica Stokes
 
Posts: 3315
Joined: Fri Jul 28, 2006 11:01 am

Post » Wed May 25, 2011 11:37 am

However saying the godhead is mad is pure hogwash

It's a pretty well established belief.
On what basis do you dismiss it?
User avatar
jeremey wisor
 
Posts: 3458
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 5:30 pm


Return to The Elder Scrolls Series Discussion