Something a really not so dumb kid has said once, which directly applies to this thread:
CHIM is not being a dev, though devs do have CHIM. If you figure out what CHIM really is (and some of you are getting very, very close) do yourself and everyone else a favor and shut up. CHIM isn't supposed to be something you can just say, because of you say it you deny what it means. CHIM isn't just its definition, but also the significance of the definition, and if you don't catch the significance the rest kind of flits out.
When you get it you'll say, "but that's impossible." "This statement is false." "Not-five."
Ever wondered why there really isn't a sticky about CHIM around? Or why people (those who really know) just don't go tell outright what CHIM is? Or why it takes 36 Lessons and a couple of Teachings to describe it?
Those who really know what CHIM is and who appreciate it, those know how fragile the whole thing really is, won't tell you what it is unless they see that you are prepared for it. If you're not prepared, like so many of you here in my opinion, the real meaning of CHIM - not its definition, but its real deeper meaning - will elude you and people will not appreciate it. That is why CHIM is a weapon. That's why CHIM breaks so easily.
And that's why telling does not equal realization. Some things need to be figured out by yourself (helping and giving pointers is okay, but not teling) or else you miss the whole point it.
I rest my case, for evidence, see this very thread.