2handed weapons

Post » Tue May 03, 2011 6:58 am

I was thinking that 2handed swords should be longer, because, as far as I know for most swords to be considered a claymore, they have to at least be the height of the user, like how they were in Morrowind, in Oblivion, they seemed to short. Also, they way characters carry a claymore/battle hammer/axe seems odd, they hold it straight up in the air, that seems like it would be unbalancing and fatiguing. I was thinking that maybe they should hold it down at their side with both hands with the blade/head behind them.
User avatar
Talitha Kukk
 
Posts: 3477
Joined: Sun Oct 08, 2006 1:14 am

Post » Tue May 03, 2011 9:59 am

Claymores are for sure my favorite weapon. Although, more than likely I will be using a longsword/shield combination instead. I don't think claymores will block incoming dragon fire very effectively.
User avatar
koumba
 
Posts: 3394
Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 8:39 pm

Post » Tue May 03, 2011 7:29 am

I suppose it did look a little awkward but I never thought too much about it. Then again, you can carry around an entire armory with you as well with out getting fatigued.


I like battle axes the best. Something about that barbarian element to role-;playing that I enjoy.
User avatar
Natalie Harvey
 
Posts: 3433
Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:15 pm

Post » Tue May 03, 2011 3:09 am

Love me a battle axe! Can't wait to play a Nord Berzerker type weilding a big ol' axe!
User avatar
~Amy~
 
Posts: 3478
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 5:38 am

Post » Tue May 03, 2011 8:55 am

I was thinking that 2handed swords should be longer, because, as far as I know for most swords to be considered a claymore, they have to at least be the height of the user, like how they were in Morrowind, in Oblivion, they seemed to short. Also, they way characters carry a claymore/battle hammer/axe seems odd, they hold it straight up in the air, that seems like it would be unbalancing and fatiguing. I was thinking that maybe they should hold it down at their side with both hands with the blade/head behind them.


I'm not really sure what you're suggesting with the way it's held. However, straight up is likely one of the least fatiguing positions for an especially long weapon to be held. The less balanced the weight is from the point or points at which it is supported, the more energy it will require to continually support it. A sword is generally only held at a handle, which is almost always at the extreme end of the weapon. When held for combat, this creates imbalance and requires the wielder to support additional weight due to the length. Particularly long or hefty weapons would be especially susceptible to this. However, if you hold it up then the weight comes down evenly and it can be supported easier. If the weapon is heavy, this also gives it more potential energy as gravity can contribute significantly to impact force.
User avatar
ILy- Forver
 
Posts: 3459
Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2007 3:18 am

Post » Mon May 02, 2011 7:08 pm

For efficiency (irl) i would use the Dai-Katana. but my favourite is Claymore. probably because of the Claymore anime that i love so much :D
User avatar
Fanny Rouyé
 
Posts: 3316
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 9:47 am

Post » Tue May 03, 2011 7:06 am

I'm not really sure what you're suggesting with the way it's held. However, straight up is likely one of the least fatiguing positions for an especially long weapon to be held. The less balanced the weight is from the point or points at which it is supported, the more energy it will require to continually support it. A sword is generally only held at a handle, which is almost always at the extreme end of the weapon. When held for combat, this creates imbalance and requires the wielder to support additional weight due to the length. Particularly long or hefty weapons would be especially susceptible to this. However, if you hold it up then the weight comes down evenly and it can be supported easier. If the weapon is heavy, this also gives it more potential energy as gravity can contribute significantly to impact force.

Yeah, I thought I might not be able to describe the stance to well. The best way I think I can describe it is if you holding the sword like you would a katana(two hand on the handle at waist level in the middle of your body) move the sword either to the left side or right side of your waist, then flip the blade around so the blade is behind you and your holding the handle kind of reversed. IDK I see big weapons held like that alot, of course, you probably could just hold it like a katana, but using a claymore or axe in that stance just seemed odd to me.
User avatar
Guinevere Wood
 
Posts: 3368
Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2006 3:06 pm

Post » Mon May 02, 2011 10:27 pm

Love me a battle axe! Can't wait to play a Nord Berzerker type weilding a big ol' axe!

This!
User avatar
Sheila Reyes
 
Posts: 3386
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 7:40 am

Post » Mon May 02, 2011 9:51 pm

Claymores really weren't made for one on one fighting, they were mostly used for destroying pikes and chopping through armor of troops.
User avatar
Mark
 
Posts: 3341
Joined: Wed May 23, 2007 11:59 am

Post » Tue May 03, 2011 8:56 am

Got to be the Tachi (or Dachi), I know it's really petty of me, but I can't help pointing out that Dai-Katana is a weird european mistranslation type of a thing. But whatever it is called, I understand the love of axes, but if the Blades lore says there are two-handed katanas in Tamriel, then bring them on.
User avatar
MatthewJontully
 
Posts: 3517
Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2007 9:33 am

Post » Tue May 03, 2011 10:20 am

Got to be the Tachi (or Dachi), I know it's really petty of me, but I can't help pointing out that Dai-Katana is a weird european mistranslation type of a thing. But whatever it is called, I understand the love of axes, but if the Blades lore says there are two-handed katanas in Tamriel, then bring them on.

Two handed katana do exist, except they're usually called Nodachis were used against cavalry by foot soldiers or Odachis was used from horse back. There was also tachis which were the Japanese equivalent of a cavalry saber. Turns out, the term "daikatana" isn't an actual word for any of these weapons, but is a made up word used to group all these weapons into one group. Daikatana means *"large sword", formed by a mistaken reading of the kanji 大刀 (Japanese: daitō), derived from the Chinese dadao. The reading mistake comes from the different ways Japanese Kanji can be read, depending on their combination or not in a word. It has been used in some (English-language) fictional works to represent a kind of large katana; the video game Daikatana, for example used this pseudo-term as its title.* So really, it's just there to group all the larger Japanese swords together and say "Hey! This is a big @#$%*&$ sword!"


* to * is a direct quote from wikipedia
User avatar
Stace
 
Posts: 3455
Joined: Sun Jun 18, 2006 2:52 pm

Post » Tue May 03, 2011 5:44 am

No spear option, blasphemy.

If it's an option, I prefer the Bastard Sword (Hand-and-a-Half), because of their flexibility in combat. Able to be wielded effectively with one or two hands, compact enough for one-on-one fighting.

Claymores come second, but like a few have already said, Claymores are more the melee equivalent of a siege weapon. Able to cut arcs through ranks of soldiers, but one-on-one (Against another human) they're poorly balanced and very detrimental to that type of engagement.
User avatar
Jamie Moysey
 
Posts: 3452
Joined: Sun May 13, 2007 6:31 am

Post » Tue May 03, 2011 7:05 am

Is this a two handed weapon?

http://www.front2enemy.com/images/fronttowardenemymine.jpg

Dai-Katana is my favourite though.
User avatar
kirsty williams
 
Posts: 3509
Joined: Sun Oct 08, 2006 5:56 am

Post » Tue May 03, 2011 1:22 am

Claymores are not generally the full height of a man, I don't think.

Anyway, some inbetween weapons like longswords should (as they do in reality) have an option to use them 2 handed for faster/stronger attacks.
User avatar
Catherine N
 
Posts: 3407
Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2007 9:58 pm

Post » Tue May 03, 2011 12:34 am

Claymores are not generally the full height of a man, I don't think.




Right, a Claymore is usually around 4.5 feet. The actual blade part something like 3feet of that, with the Handle, Pommel, Hilt and foregripping area taking up a good 2 feet.

Anyway, some inbetween weapons like longswords should (as they do in reality) have an option to use them 2 handed for faster/stronger attacks.


Hand-and-a-half (Bastard) Sword.

It's probably too much to expect, but if you equip one of those types of swords, with nothing in the offhand, they could (Either through perk or naturally) occupy both hand slots, for an increase in damage.
User avatar
Erin S
 
Posts: 3416
Joined: Sat Jul 29, 2006 2:06 pm

Post » Tue May 03, 2011 8:20 am

Claymores are not generally the full height of a man, I don't think.

Anyway, some inbetween weapons like longswords should (as they do in reality) have an option to use them 2 handed for faster/stronger attacks.

Your probably right, I just can't help shake the feeling that I heard/read that some where though, but yeah the claymore is usually around 40-55 inches. I could be thinking about the Zweih?nder which ran about 71 to 84 inches, which would be about the height of a full frown man(71in being 5'11 and 84in being 7 feet) but I never really looked up stuff about the Zweih?nder though, oh well.
User avatar
Jesus Lopez
 
Posts: 3508
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2007 10:16 pm

Post » Tue May 03, 2011 3:18 am

I think claymores are the best two handed weapons in Oblivion and now in Skyrim, because (i think) they are the coolest weapon in the game. Saying this is there going to still have Daedric Weapons ? :)
User avatar
Siobhan Wallis-McRobert
 
Posts: 3449
Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 4:09 pm

Post » Tue May 03, 2011 5:47 am

Nah, I don't think 2-handed swords were too short in Oblivion. This ain't Final Fantasy :P
If the handle is long enough for two hands, and the blade is heavy enough to snap a wrist if used single handed, it's a 2-handed weapon.
User avatar
Chantel Hopkin
 
Posts: 3533
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 9:41 am

Post » Mon May 02, 2011 6:26 pm

Nah, I don't think 2-handed swords were too short in Oblivion. This ain't Final Fantasy :P
If the handle is long enough for two hands, and the blade is heavy enough to snap a wrist if used single handed, it's a 2-handed weapon.

I like that definition of a two handed weapon! lol
User avatar
Nick Pryce
 
Posts: 3386
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 8:36 pm

Post » Tue May 03, 2011 6:14 am

Staffs and polearms

Of course, they had to restrict staffs for magic users for whatever reason and polearms aren't in the game (sadly).
User avatar
Saul C
 
Posts: 3405
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 12:41 pm

Post » Tue May 03, 2011 3:10 am

Yeah, I thought I might not be able to describe the stance to well. The best way I think I can describe it is if you holding the sword like you would a katana(two hand on the handle at waist level in the middle of your body) move the sword either to the left side or right side of your waist, then flip the blade around so the blade is behind you and your holding the handle kind of reversed. IDK I see big weapons held like that alot, of course, you probably could just hold it like a katana, but using a claymore or axe in that stance just seemed odd to me.


This style can be seen in the newest set of screens in which the Dragonborn is fighting with a giant spider. So I guess that this confirms the two handed weapon style you wanted to see in game.
User avatar
Rude_Bitch_420
 
Posts: 3429
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 2:26 pm

Post » Tue May 03, 2011 5:31 am

This style can be seen in the newest set of screens in which the Dragonborn is fighting with a giant spider. So I guess that this confirms the two handed weapon style you wanted to see in game.

Yeah, that's what I thought when I first saw it I was like "Oh, that's what I talking about." and If somebody still didn't understand what I was talking about, I was gonna refer them to that pic.
User avatar
Rhiannon Jones
 
Posts: 3423
Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2006 3:18 pm


Return to V - Skyrim