What's with the skimpy armor?

Post » Wed Mar 30, 2011 8:20 am

Look up Roman armor. It's kind of skimpy. It would make no sense to have all armor meant to cover you up entirely, as the OP suggests.



Roman armor isn't skimpy, it covers the entire torso and the head (not the face). They wore leather skirts that went down to their knees and iron leggings. They also carried a hard wood tower shield. It was very flexible and lite compared to medieval armor, but it still protected very well and covered the whole body. You can have mobility without leaving your body exposed.
User avatar
Leanne Molloy
 
Posts: 3342
Joined: Sat Sep 02, 2006 1:09 am

Post » Wed Mar 30, 2011 1:03 pm

Roman armor isn't skimpy, it covers the entire torso and the head (not the face). They wore leather skirts that went down to their knees and iron leggings. They also carried a hard wood tower shield. It was very flexible and lite compared to medieval armor, but it still protected very well and covered the whole body. You can have mobility without leaving your body exposed.


Leather legs actually. Also, the armors you shown covered the torso and the shoulders also just like roman armor. The only one that didn't was the one where the dovahkiin wasn't wearing a chest and that's just because he doesn't want to and plenty of people have done that in the past because they believe it makes them more of a man if they go into combat unarmored and come out alive.
User avatar
benjamin corsini
 
Posts: 3411
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2007 11:32 pm

Post » Wed Mar 30, 2011 4:03 am

Yeah, a bit more of cloth would be nice. Confused frat boys love seeing them skins on their buff-bodied toons though, so I dunno if I'll get my wish. I want my elite Nordic warrior to sporting http://scribalterror.blogs.com/.shared/image.html?/photos/uncategorized/2008/03/08/viking.jpg look if possible.


Step 1: State opinion on stylistic choices.
Step 2: Sweeping insult towards anyone who disagrees with your opinion.
Step 3: Post picture of confused frat boy to support your opinion?
User avatar
Amber Hubbard
 
Posts: 3537
Joined: Tue Dec 05, 2006 6:59 pm

Post » Wed Mar 30, 2011 3:45 am

The big full plate armor you're imagining right now didn't exist untill 1600-ish. That's Shakespeare era. Big, heavy, hard to move in. Wouldn't be much fun. The advent of guns made them largely obsolete. Oblivion's armor was fairly unrealistic compared to Morrowind's.

That said, we have yet to see screenshots of every armor set yet. I do like the scrappy light armor we've seen so far, and I intend on using that if only for aesthetic purposes. Keep your hopes up, though. Chances are good you'll get your full/half plate.
User avatar
Bloomer
 
Posts: 3435
Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 9:23 pm

Post » Wed Mar 30, 2011 9:32 am

The big full plate armor you're imagining right now didn't exist untill 1600-ish. That's Shakespeare era. Big, heavy, hard to move in. Wouldn't be much fun. The advent of guns made them largely obsolete. Oblivion's armor was fairly unrealistic compared to Morrowind's.

That said, we have yet to see screenshots of every armor set yet. I do like the scrappy light armor we've seen so far, and I intend on using that if only for aesthetic purposes. Keep your hopes up, though. Chances are good you'll get your full/half plate.



Actually it existed by the late 1400s. Heavy armor was no longer used in the 1600's because of guns.
User avatar
Harry Leon
 
Posts: 3381
Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2007 3:53 am

Post » Wed Mar 30, 2011 10:28 am

This is full.
User avatar
TASTY TRACY
 
Posts: 3282
Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 7:11 pm

Previous

Return to V - Skyrim