I think the whole point of bg2408 was that including such things into a patch (or something that is concieved as a patch by the simple user) can cause conflicts from an unexpected angle. Can bg2408 just add a note to warn his mod users of possible conflicts with this new hotfix? Ofcourse he can. But not everything in this hotfix is 'wrong', there are plenty of things that indeed needed fixing and for possible future updates there will probably be more. So users would be forced to either ignore some genuine bugs or avoid using a certain mod. In my eyes, that isn't the right path to take for UOP, hotfix or not. :shrug:
Not trying to stir up the flames, just shedding my thoughts on the things I've read in this thread. I know the two most discussed changes have already been removed/undone and re-uploaded, I'm more concerned (not really the right word, sorry) of this happening again in the future and perhaps on a much larger scale. And I think that is partially why bg2408 posted what he posted, because of the direction UOP appeared to be moving, not its current location (well maybe a little bit).
Having said all that, thank you Arthmoor for the hotfix. Regardless of everything that has been said it took hard work to make and release it and I would never be ungrateful for that. :foodndrink:
-kyoma