No, because they didn't convince me the first time. You cite an extremely shallow throw-away mechanic in which your character is addressed thusly: "What can I do for you, ?" Oh, right, can't forget the paper that Redoran councilor hands you, wherein it states that you describe your profession as . What an exhilarating and immersive mechanic! Truly its absence shall absolutely ruin my ability to get into my character's head and figure out what decisions he would make, all because nobody refers to him as a text field I filled out myself, which could have been anything from Federal briast Inspector to ASDFOIE;FLAJDS;LA. The sky is falling! Oblivion belches forth a host of foul Daedra to flay us and devour our souls! The land is torn asunder and the Earth Bones twist and warp about themselves, mutating the whole of reality into something horrifying and beyond comprehension!
Well excuse me for presenting an option, excuse me for having an opinion.
I believe I gave apt
examples and explained my reasoning in a manner sufficient to convey my thoughts on the subject.
If you want to deconstruct what I say by ridiculising it and being sarcastic, snide and a rather unpleasant about it, well, then by default Ill assume that this converation is now over, with a +1 for my side of the argument and a -1 for you personally.
It really would do better to engage people in a civil tone, using sound reasoning and verifiable logic.
There is absolutely no need for this kind of overbearingness and tone.
So Ill tip my hat to you, good sir, and shall henceforth class your posts as 'nothing Im interested in'.
Meanwhile I shall continue to advocate that instruments for roleplaying in an RPG are logical, wanted and that there is no reason at all to remove them.