Questions about the card game Caravan

Post » Fri Jul 23, 2010 6:20 am

Either I still didn't get the rules of Caravan even after reading the detailed explanation on the fallout wiki or it is a bug, please tell me.

So I got a heart of Ace as the first card of a deck and I wanna play a 2 of Spades on it. From how I understood the rules this should be possible, but it's not - why?

Another example: The first card of the deck is a 6 of Clubs and I wanna play a 7 of Spades or a 5 of Hearts on it to make the deck either ascending or descending - but I cannot.

Why? What did I not get, or is this a bug? :unsure:

Thanks for any help in advance. :)
User avatar
Cool Man Sam
 
Posts: 3392
Joined: Thu May 10, 2007 1:19 pm

Post » Thu Jul 22, 2010 7:34 pm

what does it matter how to play (it seems pretty confusing)? You can barely make out what's on the cards they're so small anyways. My TV is 27 inches and I still can't see the card.
User avatar
Andres Lechuga
 
Posts: 3406
Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2007 8:47 pm

Post » Fri Jul 23, 2010 5:21 am

what does it matter how to play (it seems pretty confusing)? You can barely make out what's on the cards they're so small anyways. My TV is 27 inches and I still can't see the card.


???

Then you should get new glasses, honestly. They are big and you can see them very well, at least in my game.
User avatar
Thema
 
Posts: 3461
Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2006 2:36 am

Post » Fri Jul 23, 2010 5:58 am

Either I still didn't get the rules of Caravan even after reading the detailed explanation on the fallout wiki or it is a bug, please tell me.

So I got a heart of Ace as the first card of a deck and I wanna play a 2 of Spades on it. From how I understood the rules this should be possible, but it's not - why?

Another example: The first card of the deck is a 6 of Clubs and I wanna play a 7 of Spades or a 5 of Hearts on it to make the deck either ascending or descending - but I cannot.

Why? What did I not get, or is this a bug? :unsure:

Thanks for any help in advance. :)


Sounds to me like your Caravan is bugged. Either that or you're trying to add cards to a caravan before having placed all 3 initial cards for each caravan.

In caravan, you can add any number card to another number card, aslong as it's either of the same suit or following the patch (rise/fall) of the caravan.
User avatar
Lynette Wilson
 
Posts: 3424
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 4:20 pm

Post » Fri Jul 23, 2010 9:25 am

If you put the 2 below the Ace, not next to it, using the down arrow key on pc, the card should turn from red to green, if not you are indeed bugged.
User avatar
Hayley O'Gara
 
Posts: 3465
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2006 2:53 am

Post » Fri Jul 23, 2010 2:39 am

i gave up on caravan, considering just looting enemy corpses is far more profitible and enjoyable. not to mention more straightforward.
User avatar
Laura-Lee Gerwing
 
Posts: 3363
Joined: Fri Jan 12, 2007 12:46 am

Post » Thu Jul 22, 2010 9:43 pm

Either I still didn't get the rules of Caravan even after reading the detailed explanation on the fallout wiki or it is a bug, please tell me.

So I got a heart of Ace as the first card of a deck and I wanna play a 2 of Spades on it. From how I understood the rules this should be possible, but it's not - why?

Another example: The first card of the deck is a 6 of Clubs and I wanna play a 7 of Spades or a 5 of Hearts on it to make the deck either ascending or descending - but I cannot.

Why? What did I not get, or is this a bug? :unsure:

Thanks for any help in advance. :)


I think your problem is you try to use wasd to navigate not the arrow keys (I had the same problem).
User avatar
Emily Jeffs
 
Posts: 3335
Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2006 10:27 pm

Post » Thu Jul 22, 2010 10:13 pm

2 things: Either you haven't put the first three cards down yet, or you are putting the card to the "side" instead of below it.

Question for the masses:

Has the computer ever played a Jack, Queen, etc on YOUR side of the table to screw you up? I havent seen one do it to me yet. I love dropping Jacks on the computer to kill their caravans.
User avatar
Tanya
 
Posts: 3358
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 6:01 am

Post » Thu Jul 22, 2010 11:28 pm

has the computer ever played a Jack, Queen, etc on YOUR side of the table to screw you up? I havent seen one do it to me yet. I love dropping Jacks on the computer to kill their caravans.


Nope, Even though I don't completely understand the rules (I don't know exactly when and why a game ends for example) I still win more than I lose because the AI seems as confused as I am.
User avatar
BRAD MONTGOMERY
 
Posts: 3354
Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2007 10:43 pm

Post » Fri Jul 23, 2010 5:06 am

2 things: Either you haven't put the first three cards down yet, or you are putting the card to the "side" instead of below it.

Question for the masses:

Has the computer ever played a Jack, Queen, etc on YOUR side of the table to screw you up? I havent seen one do it to me yet. I love dropping Jacks on the computer to kill their caravans.



Have never seen the computer do this. Hence my 25,000+ caps in winnings. I don't even play it anymore. It's broken. I had a foolproof deck and system and was winning 100% of my games because the computer will not use a face card against you. I thought is broken even then but yesterday someone pointed out to me that I was making it even more complicated than need be. I didn't realize you could keep discarding in the beginning without the opponent playing his cards. Now the game is just stupid. There's no way you can lose.
User avatar
Jessie Butterfield
 
Posts: 3453
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 5:59 pm

Post » Fri Jul 23, 2010 10:25 am

Have never seen the computer do this. Hence my 25,000+ caps in winnings. I don't even play it anymore. It's broken. I had a foolproof deck and system and was winning 100% of my games because the computer will not use a face card against you. I thought is broken even then but yesterday someone pointed out to me that I was making it even more complicated than need be. I didn't realize you could keep discarding in the beginning without the opponent playing his cards. Now the game is just stupid. There's no way you can lose.


Yeah, haha you just keep discarding until you have 10's, 9's and 7's. LOL
User avatar
Nuno Castro
 
Posts: 3414
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 1:40 am

Post » Fri Jul 23, 2010 2:27 am

Yeah, haha you just keep discarding until you have 10's, 9's and 7's. LOL


Exactly. Ks, 10s & 6s work too. It's idiotic. I'm kind of shocked they overlooked this when making the game.
User avatar
Rusty Billiot
 
Posts: 3431
Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2007 10:22 pm

Post » Fri Jul 23, 2010 9:49 am

Exactly. Ks, 10s & 6s work too. It's idiotic. I'm kind of shocked they overlooked this when making the game.


Yep , the unrestricted discards in the opening rounds as well as the flexibility you have in deck building (duplicate Value/Suit cards allowed if they come from a different deck!) makes the game so loose its impossible to lose. If the AI was more aggressive with face cards it would be a tiny bit more interesting since you'd have ot keep more Jacks around for putting out fires - but it would still be a cakewalk.
User avatar
Kevan Olson
 
Posts: 3402
Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2007 1:09 am

Post » Fri Jul 23, 2010 2:49 am

It's a decent game if both players were limited to playing with just one deck of cards. Fairly original, decent fun. However, as people have said there are 2 things that make it nothing but a cap factory:

1) You can have multiple of the same card so having a huge pile of the perfect 3 cards is easy
2) The NPCs will not use face cards against you


Also, the fact that it never tells you "USE THE UP AND DOWN ARROWS PLEASE AND THANK YOU" is probably turning 85% of people away from the game instantly.
User avatar
Blaine
 
Posts: 3456
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 4:24 pm

Post » Fri Jul 23, 2010 10:06 am

Yep , the unrestricted discards in the opening rounds as well as the flexibility you have in deck building (duplicate Value/Suit cards allowed if they come from a different deck!) makes the game so loose its impossible to lose. If the AI was more aggressive with face cards it would be a tiny bit more interesting since you'd have ot keep more Jacks around for putting out fires - but it would still be a cakewalk.


If it wasn't for the unrestricted opening discards I'd still play the game. At least there's still some strategy applied if you couldn't do that. It's still 100% winnable because the computer won't use face cards against you but the unlimited discards ruined it for me.
User avatar
jeremey wisor
 
Posts: 3458
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 5:30 pm

Post » Fri Jul 23, 2010 2:01 am

i gave up on caravan, considering just looting enemy corpses is far more profitible and enjoyable. not to mention more straightforward.


If looting corpses is more profitable, then you're just not playing Caravan right. If you know how to play the game you really can't lose, and combine that with shopkeepers who play, and you can completely clean them out. As far as the enjoyable part, that's a personal opinion.
User avatar
jessica breen
 
Posts: 3524
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 1:04 am

Post » Fri Jul 23, 2010 7:09 am

It's a decent game if both players were limited to playing with just one deck of cards. Fairly original, decent fun. However, as people have said there are 2 things that make it nothing but a cap factory:

1) You can have multiple of the same card so having a huge pile of the perfect 3 cards is easy
2) The NPCs will not use face cards against you


Also, the fact that it never tells you "USE THE UP AND DOWN ARROWS PLEASE AND THANK YOU" is probably turning 85% of people away from the game instantly.


1) This wouldn't be a big issue if 2) actually happened I don't think.

The biggest thing that makes it a cap factory is that you can discard until you have the perfect hand while the NPC just sits there and watches you.
User avatar
TOYA toys
 
Posts: 3455
Joined: Sat Jan 13, 2007 4:22 am

Post » Fri Jul 23, 2010 12:32 pm

The biggest thing that makes it a cap factory is that you can discard until you have the perfect hand while the NPC just sits there and watches you.


I'd maybe raise the minimum card limit to 32 and only allow the player to discard in the opening rounds if he had no playable cards in his hand.
User avatar
c.o.s.m.o
 
Posts: 3419
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 9:21 am

Post » Fri Jul 23, 2010 1:26 pm

I constantly see most caravan opponents destroy their own caravans with jacks. It's kind of hilarious.
User avatar
Beulah Bell
 
Posts: 3372
Joined: Thu Nov 23, 2006 7:08 pm

Post » Fri Jul 23, 2010 1:32 pm

I'd maybe raise the minimum card limit to 32 and only allow the player to discard in the opening rounds if he had no playable cards in his hand.


I don't mind the 30 minimum personally but your other suggestion is dead on.

If you had to play correctly you wouldn't even run into that problem very often either because having so many face cards that you end up not having cards to play in the opening wouldn't be a winning strategy anyway.
User avatar
Harinder Ghag
 
Posts: 3405
Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 11:26 am

Post » Fri Jul 23, 2010 8:08 am

It needs tweaked... setting a "minimum and maximum" number of possible cards would be one help. I like the idea that a discard should always end the turn, even during the opening phase when you need to place (3) numeric cards. The AI needs to be taught to use face cards against the opponent as well.

(I suspect this will only be fixed with mods, especially the AI play style.)

There are also a few videos on youtube now explaining the game. It wasn't until my 2nd or 3rd attempt that it finally started to make sense. And teasing apart a game as I http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ayb48b-4L5g made a lot of things much clearer.
User avatar
Cat
 
Posts: 3451
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2006 5:10 am

Post » Fri Jul 23, 2010 12:53 am

Thanks, I just didn't know I had to push the arrow down key to play the cards. Maybe should have been explained somewhere.
User avatar
Genocidal Cry
 
Posts: 3357
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 10:02 pm

Post » Fri Jul 23, 2010 3:44 am

I like the idea that a discard should always end the turn, even during the opening phase when you need to place (3) numeric cards.


This, according to the rules, is what is supposed to happen. It also says you can't discard until you have one card in each caravan. Clearly you can so it's a bug.
User avatar
Dalia
 
Posts: 3488
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 12:29 pm


Return to Fallout: New Vegas