I have to be able to get into the story of the game, and New Vegas made that much easier IMO. So I don't mind ending the game and wrapping up the story.
That being said, and as much as I hate to admit it, I kinda agree with this guy. It would have been nice to be able to continue on in a game with real-time changes. But I feel like that sort of thing is a long way off, and there aren't any games that I know of that have executed this idea effectively.
That being said, and as much as I hate to admit it, I kinda agree with this guy. It would have been nice to be able to continue on in a game with real-time changes. But I feel like that sort of thing is a long way off, and there aren't any games that I know of that have executed this idea effectively.
the new vegas story is awesome i agree, the quests are good, obsidian made a lot of improvements over FO3, more quests, a lot better skill/perk/special system, more weapons etc, i would like more in game changes, when i hear people going, "there's so many changes at the end you can't continue it would be impossible for them to do all that" the problem with that is the alternative is there are no changes anyway except imaginary ones, so i think the next fallout needs to not have some huge game changing ending quest because it really means you don't get to play the game, so i prefer less actual in game changes with the ability to keep playing over huge changes that are impossible to execute in the game.