Wrong thread. Forum just glitched out on me.

Double post.

strength removed confirmed sorry pal.

Health stat.

atleast dual longswords but two handers i dont know thats to unrealistic, that would ruin it

nice half off all answers here is like "no no just no its so unrealistic" i assume the most only read the title and post their sentence and go to the next thread

well if xivilai can it why not I if i can kill them in 2-3 hits why should it be denied to me ?

and this dual wielding 2hands would be nice and really anyone who complains about realistic should just jump from a cliff ingame and die.... oh but wait you can load a savegame seems really unrealistic to me!

So, would it level up 1 handed, or 2 handed?

I would loathe seeing 2 handers used in each hand by NPC's. If it was an option for the player only (as in with a perk), then I could tolerate it as I would never use it. There is also a large difference between what the Xivlivai did and having a 2 hander in each hand. I prefer my game to not be like an anime.

That right here.

Wanna know why it doesn't work?

Go grab two broom sticks, hold them with only 2 fingers each, right at the very end of the handle and try to swing them around in some useful manner. Thats why you can't do it.

The whole concept of dual wielding two handed weapons is a little lame IMO. As has been stated they're TWO handed weapons, so unless you're some colossus with four arms I don't see how its possible. Remember the Devs build the game to fit with the lore of TES, for the most part. Blatantly obliterating this would mean its not really TES.

Never.
Sure if you are strong enough you can hold one in each hand but... Try fighting effectively with them. You can't.

:rock: :rock: :rock:

Even Mehrunes Dagon thinks this is a stupid idea, and he's got four arms.

See.... that's exactly why I think it should be possible.

To me, the way to deal with things like that is not to just arbitrarily say, "No - you can't do it," but to make it so that you can do it, but make it realistic, which is to say, obviously ineffective. The weapon would be too heavy and long to handle well with one hand, it wouldn't do much more damage, if any, with one hand (and might even end up doing less than a blade made for one hand), you'd be defenseless as soon as something got inside of your reach, it'd burn through stamina very quickly, and I'm sure there are more problems I'm not thinking of right at the moment.... so fine. If somebody wants to swing a heavy weapon slowly and poorly and do less damage - go for it. At least his opponents will get a good laugh out of it before they kill him.

Wut?
They should add an immediately redundant feature?

Thats nothing if not ridiculous.

Somebody took this wayyyyyyyyy too literal and completely missed my point.... :slap:

You...I do not like at the moment. :prod: lol

I hope not. It would totally wreck the whole purpose of two-handed weapons.

Why stop at that? I want THIS : http://www.nuklearpower.com/2009/01/27/episode-1087-exalted-feat/

What? To die in a magically redirected volley of your own arrows?