Dynamic skies

Post » Thu Mar 03, 2011 5:29 am

Looking at the skies of Oblivion, it hurts a little them being http://www.tesnexus.com/downloads/images/18305-3-1266158155.jpg everywhere.

Dynamic skyboxes (at least that's what I think they are called, correct me if I'm wrong), are different though. They make the sky seem bigger and more varied. They aren't that hard to do either; a mod did it for Fallout NV.

Here's a few examples of what I think are some awesome skies:
1: http://www.pcgameshardware.com/screenshots/original/2008/08/ClearSky_DX9_00.png
2: http://www.gameplaymonthly.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/stalker_clear_sky_20080131_1.jpg
3: http://ve3dmedia.ign.com/images/07/70/77069_Rage-Wallpaper-03.jpg

Here's a few examples of what Skyrim skies look like, which isn't that good I think... if I have to be 100% honest (I think it looks pretty much like Oblivion's skies :confused:)
1: http://media.pcgamer.com/files/2011/02/The-Elder-Scrolls-V-Skyrim-Dragon.jpg
2: http://pcmedia.ign.com/pc/image/article/114/1149185/elder-scrolls-v-skyrim-20110211094554924.jpg

So... would you want "dynamic skies" (or at least the skies to look better than in the Skyrim pics)?
Persoanolly, I'd love it. It's adds even more beauty to the skies I think :)
User avatar
Jennie Skeletons
 
Posts: 3452
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 8:21 am

Post » Thu Mar 03, 2011 3:00 am

Thought a bump could be needed.
User avatar
Naazhe Perezz
 
Posts: 3393
Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2006 6:14 am

Post » Thu Mar 03, 2011 5:25 am

Add the "I don't care" option and I'll vote for that.

I almost never look at the sky. As long as it's not so terrible that it distracts from gameplay, and as long as I see Masser and Secunda at night, I don't care. It's just a petty detail.
User avatar
Elena Alina
 
Posts: 3415
Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2007 7:24 am

Post » Thu Mar 03, 2011 4:23 pm

I have seen far worse skies then what I have seen in the Skyrim screens. I do think that the skys in Rage look almost too good, they make everything els look worse then it is because they seam so good. At least in that picture
User avatar
James Wilson
 
Posts: 3457
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2007 12:51 pm

Post » Thu Mar 03, 2011 2:35 pm

Add the "I don't care" option and I'll vote for that.

I almost never look at the sky. As long as it's not so terrible that it distracts from gameplay, and as long as I see Masser and Secunda at night, I don't care. It's just a petty detail.


There you go :)

I have seen far worse skies then what I have seen in the Skyrim screens. I do think that the skys in Rage look almost too good, they make everything els look worse then it is because they seam so good. At least in that picture

For their time, the skies in Bethesda's games have always been really good. Especially Morrowind's.
Would be sad to depart from that tradition I think :)

It's a little hard to tell if dynamic skies are in or not, but I do think that they can look a whole lot better than those on the screens. Guess it's a personal preference though.
User avatar
Heather Stewart
 
Posts: 3525
Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2006 11:04 pm

Post » Thu Mar 03, 2011 3:37 am

First thats console version
Second wait for mods
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g44Q36PLh0Y
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xc3zEXYm6FY
User avatar
u gone see
 
Posts: 3388
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2007 2:53 pm

Post » Thu Mar 03, 2011 12:09 pm

Those skies you show in the top are great! I hope skyrim look like those.
User avatar
Javier Borjas
 
Posts: 3392
Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2007 6:34 pm

Post » Thu Mar 03, 2011 10:30 am

I want it
User avatar
Lewis Morel
 
Posts: 3431
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2007 7:40 pm

Post » Thu Mar 03, 2011 10:39 am

For me it would depend very much on how it would effect performance...


For real - those first 3 sky links you posted , are so good , that they could be mistaken for Photo's.
User avatar
mishionary
 
Posts: 3414
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 6:19 am

Post » Thu Mar 03, 2011 4:14 pm

First thats console version
Second wait for mods
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g44Q36PLh0Y
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xc3zEXYm6FY


1. Having good skies is something a console can handle. It's just a few textures, so not a memory issue. And no performance hit here either.
A http://www.newvegasnexus.com/downloads/file.php?id=35998 managed to do it with, from what it seems, zero peformance hit. It's basically just a different type of skydome if I understand correctly.

2. Why shouldn't the actual creators of the game make sure we have great-looking skies from the start? Mods is not really the question here. We're talking about the game itself. The real game. The "wait for mods" excuse can be said about practically everything for every single game.

Also, not really sure why you showed those videos. They have nothing to do with dynamic skies.
And the cloud shadows were never released, probably never will be. In the SSAO-video, the sky is incredibly over-bloomed as well and you can't even see the clouds.
User avatar
Angela Woods
 
Posts: 3336
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 2:15 pm

Post » Thu Mar 03, 2011 5:53 am

I don't care too much about the textures used for the sky. They are important for the atmosphere of a certain weather type, but they don't necessarily have to be awe-inspiring.

I have high hopes for the other parts of the weather anyway. Dynamic snow sounds great and the clouds around the mountains in the screenshot you posted look pretty great too. I don't believe we'll see completely realistic 3D clouds, though, I guess it's more like ground fog. But that would be asking too much.
User avatar
Anthony Santillan
 
Posts: 3461
Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2007 6:42 am

Post » Thu Mar 03, 2011 4:36 pm

I was playing Assassin's Creed Brotherhood earlier and that has skies like the ones you want. And I hated it! It looked so bad. Honestly. I hope they keep the style that we've seen in the screenshots.
User avatar
Adam
 
Posts: 3446
Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2007 2:56 pm

Post » Thu Mar 03, 2011 10:22 am

Won't really care, I'll probably be too busy Decapitating dragons and pillaging villages to look up. :shrug:
User avatar
Kristina Campbell
 
Posts: 3512
Joined: Sun Oct 15, 2006 7:08 am

Post » Thu Mar 03, 2011 7:28 am

awesomeness



are us two the only ones to think that skyrim should be graphically well ahead of its time? skyrim should have the best of everything so that the game looks awesome even after a few years.
User avatar
Phoenix Draven
 
Posts: 3443
Joined: Thu Jun 29, 2006 3:50 am

Post » Thu Mar 03, 2011 3:15 am

we already know clouds build up on mountins dynamicaly like you would expect... duno nif they have come up with a dynamic cloud generator I do hope at least they randomly gen cloud patterns from time to time specialy from season to season and from weather type to weather type.
User avatar
Amber Ably
 
Posts: 3372
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2007 4:39 pm

Post » Thu Mar 03, 2011 6:01 pm

I can't really see how the Skyrim sky is any worse than others you linked to. :shrug:
Meaning its as good as it needs to be for me. The only thing that bothered me about Oblivions sky was when you saw an oblivion gate in the distance the sky would be red and stormy for the next ten minutes.

Off topic: that RAGE screen :drool:
User avatar
Maddy Paul
 
Posts: 3430
Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 4:20 pm

Post » Thu Mar 03, 2011 1:43 pm

The only thing that bothered me about Oblivions sky was when you saw an oblivion gate in the distance the sky would be red and stormy for the next ten minutes.

That is one thing that bothered me really much too.
Would be awesome if you like... saw a thunderstorm coming near you in the horizon! :D

we already know clouds build up on mountins dynamicaly like you would expect... duno nif they have come up with a dynamic cloud generator I do hope at least they randomly gen cloud patterns from time to time specialy from season to season and from weather type to weather type.

You're mixing things up a bit. That about the mountains is more like fog / lower clouds. And they aren't dynamic. They're volumetric.
I'm talking about the "skies" themselves. They're always there, whether lower clouds are in or not. Though if the above clouds are volumetric as well (which it certainly doesn't look like in those pictures to me), then the skies are just a blank blue texture, pretty much. But that's not really the case here, I think.

are us two the only ones to think that skyrim should be graphically well ahead of its time? skyrim should have the best of everything so that the game looks awesome even after a few years.

All Bethesda's previous games have had aweeesome graphics (except for Fallout 3 and Fallout NV, they were... a lot behind). Would be sad to depart from that tradition.
Graphics, and in this case awesome skies (which doesn't seem to be the hardest thing to do; since a mod did it for F: NV), adds quite a bit to the atmosphere and enjoyment of the game.

I'm not saying gameplay or anything is unimportant though, before anyone starts to flame me. I'm saying the attention should be put to both equally. But in this case, it feels as if graphics (in this case skies) are a bit behind as well.
I think a little more attention to this wouldn't hurt... :confused:
User avatar
Maeva
 
Posts: 3349
Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 11:27 pm


Return to V - Skyrim