Fallout New Vegas Vent : Fallout: New Vegas

» Tue Sep 30, 2008 4:13 pm

Well thats easy to say either way if you know what i mean you should stop derailing the entire post with your crusade on using a word and get on topic because its a gigantic waste of time or just leave if your still inclined to argue about it.

I derailed the thread?
I'm on a crusade?

Aaaanyway, it's the same boring old story.

Obsidian was given 2 years to make this game, they didn't have time to improve upon Gamebryo which resulted in exactly the same graphics.
And it's glitchy because BETHESDA pushed it out the door too soon.
AI is crap in ME2 as well.
I agree about the emotionless part to an extent, some NPC's are really just carboard cutout moving their mouths.
And Fallout 3 was linear as hell, you get 4 choices in the main quest, first is save wasteland second is put FEV in PP.
Then with BS we got two more: blow up Citadel or blow up Crawler.
Don't see how it's "not" linear.

» Tue Sep 30, 2008 9:56 am

Kids these days, never voicing their complaints in a civilized manor... You bring great shame to wolfies everywhere. Flaming, flamebaiting, censor avoidance, bigotry...

» Tue Sep 30, 2008 7:38 pm

I wonder why the thread isn't locket yet though. :/

Aaanyway, I think Wolfman here is one of those rare people that got a broken version of the game.
Either that or his game-system have been mistreated and couldn't run New Vegas properly. (GTA IV started overheating my xbox cause it was 2 years old and then it gave me RROD but it works perfectly fine on my brand new xbox)

ME2? Don't you mean ME1? And even then, no.

haha, should i direct to the wiki section on new vegas bugs or to the flood of youtube videos on new vegas glitches? here they are anyways, btw gta iv worked fine for me and its also was much funner.

http://fallout.wikia.com/wiki/Fallout:_New_Vegas_bugs
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FUM7K0eqDVw

well i guess ign is wrong for give mass effect 2 a bunch of awards including goty and game rankings which is collection of review from different sites has it wrong for averaging it to 95.66%, where did they go wrong?
btw New Vegas is at 83.64% thats a *big improvement* from 92.79% on fallout 3s part :wink_smile:

» Tue Sep 30, 2008 9:24 am

well i guess IGN is wrong for give mass effect 2 a bunch of awards including goty and game rankings which is collection of review from different sites has it wrong for averaging it to 95.66%, where did they go wrong?

They are wrong.

» Tue Sep 30, 2008 6:15 pm

funner.

:facepalm:

Also not downloading Dead Money is a huge mistake, where are you getting these really negative reviews from?

» Tue Sep 30, 2008 10:17 am

haha, should i direct to the wiki section on new vegas bugs or to the flood of youtube videos on new vegas glitches? here they are anyways, btw gta iv worked fine for me and its also was much funner.

http://fallout.wikia.com/wiki/Fallout:_New_Vegas_bugs
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FUM7K0eqDVw

well i guess ign is wrong for give mass effect 2 a bunch of awards including goty and game rankings which is collection of review from different sites has it wrong for averaging it to 95.66%, where did they go wrong?
btw New Vegas is at 83.64% thats a *big improvement* from 92.79% on fallout 3s part :wink_smile:

Yes because gamescores on sites like metacritic and gamerankings is the end all be all stamp of awesome or svck on a game. Never mind the fact that those scores are just a collection of peoples opinions. So weather or not Fallout new vegas is an improvement over fallout 3 is purely subjective and an opinion, nothing more.

You think it isn't, I think it is. Done.

Now lets all eat some pie with tea and just be friends everyone, alright?

No? Fine I GET ALL THE PIE. Hmph.
:P

» Tue Sep 30, 2008 7:53 am

IGN IS THE WORD OF GOD HOW DARE YOU!

» Tue Sep 30, 2008 8:26 am

:facepalm:

Also not downloading Dead Money is a huge mistake, where are you getting these really negative reviews from?

http://www.nma-fallout.com/#57457
http://www.nma-fallout.com/#57473
http://www.nma-fallout.com/#57483
:shrug:

» Tue Sep 30, 2008 5:41 pm

I derailed the thread?
I'm on a crusade?

Aaaanyway, it's the same boring old story.

Obsidian was given 2 years to make this game, they didn't have time to improve upon Gamebryo which resulted in exactly the same graphics.
And it's glitchy because BETHESDA pushed it out the door too soon.
AI is crap in ME2 as well.
I agree about the emotionless part to an extent, some NPC's are really just carboard cutout moving their mouths.
And Fallout 3 was linear as hell, you get 4 choices in the main quest, first is save wasteland second is put FEV in PP.
Then with BS we got two more: blow up Citadel or blow up Crawler.
Don't see how it's "not" linear.

Well you were about to argue on why it was justified for me to use fa.g
how about obsidian not work on the sequel to fallout 3 when Bethesda had something when they released fallout 3? makes sense?
That has to be bias in some way because all i see is ME2 getting rave reviews about it, lol however if you want to pick on a game that has [censored] a.i. why not go for New Vegas instead?
Dude, do you even know what linear is? Your obviously trying to say that fallout 3 doesnt have as many endings as new vegas has which is true but fallout 3 is far from being linear why? because theres a bunch of side quest to do on it couple with the dlcs that came out for it already. Its not at all linear like ff 13 if thats what your trying to say.

» Tue Sep 30, 2008 4:21 pm

FNV has MOAR side quests than Fallout 3

» Tue Sep 30, 2008 10:10 am

http://www.nma-fallout.com/#57457
http://www.nma-fallout.com/#57473
http://www.nma-fallout.com/#57483
:shrug:

NMA is entirely staffed by people who are such hardcoe canon fanatics that they question some facets of Fallout 2. What they say holds little water for me anymore.

» Tue Sep 30, 2008 1:12 pm

1Well you were about to argue on why it was justified for me to use fa.g
2how about obsidian not work on the sequel to fallout 3 when Bethesda had something when they released fallout 3? makes sense?
3That has to be bias in some way because all i see is ME2 getting rave reviews about it, lol however if you want to pick on a game that has [censored] a.i. why not go for New Vegas instead?
4Dude, do you even know what linear is? Your obviously trying to say that fallout 3 doesnt have as many endings as new vegas has which is true but fallout 3 is far from being linear why? because theres a bunch of side quest to do on it couple with the dlcs that came out for it already. Its not at all linear like ff 13 if thats what your trying to say.

1It didn't justify you to use the word.
2Erm, what?
3ME2: Enemies move behind cover, player moves behind cover, now play happy slap with each other until one side fall down... Great AI! At least in Vegas they use grenades, stimpacks, call for backup, try to flank you, use cover as well and other things.
4Fallout 3: story-linear, exploration-nonlinear.
FalloutNV: Story-non-linear, exploration-nonlinear.
Nope, don't see your case for it being linear. :shrug:

Finalwish Well, NMA didn't make those reviews, they've just gathered up all reviews they've found and posted them on the new section, so NMA isn't biased, there are some positive reviews about DM and some negative.

» Tue Sep 30, 2008 2:30 pm

If you love ME2 so much, then for this forums sake... please run and play it :bolt:

» Tue Sep 30, 2008 11:28 am

I'm curious, how many times has this thread been reported, all reporters say "Aye."

» Tue Sep 30, 2008 9:50 am

Aye.
I think that the mods are playing volley-boll

» Tue Sep 30, 2008 11:41 pm

Actually, I was watching Battlestar Galactica, but I guess the Volleyball thought was close.