» Sun Nov 09, 2008 4:38 pm
Agreed. From the rests of the posts, you'd think Crytek advertised the cure for cancer and delivered an animated GIF of stick figures shooting at each other. This game is awesome; the complaints about the graphics are way overblown. I'm running a GeForce GFX 460M in a laptop and this game looks absolutely awesome. Come to think of it, I wonder if anyone remembers how the first Crysis was "the system-breaker" graphically... can you blame Crytek for toning down the graphics so people can actually play it?
Yes cause back when crysis 1 was released, no one really had any great video cards and dx10.1 was new as ****. But now, we have dx11 video cards, we have mulit gpu for dx11 and even the 6990 is released and soon, the 590 is going to be released so we have more than enough horse power to run it. Why did they not just put dx11? Thats my question. See, the reason I am hating this so much is cause crysis is suppose the set the pc apart from the consoles by delivering graphics that the consoles can only dream of having. Yes, its a fun game but crysis was mainly known for graphics. "Best dx9 game" is like saying: hey guys, we made a game that looks the best from a technology that we had 9-10 years ago. 8 core support, pshhhhh crysis 2 wont even need that...