I, like many other PC gamers, are extremely disappointed. After waiting years for a sequel to the original Crysis, the predecessor is practically comical.

Here is why:
-As we've all heard, it didn't launch with DX11. What have you been doing all this time in development? Of all games, why would you skimp out on Crysis? Using a 6 year old technology to showcase what's supposed to be the sequel to the "best looking game ever" is ludicrous.

-The "Graphic" options are a joke. Presets? This is Crysis, the visual powerhouse that coined the term "But can it play Crysis?" Now the visual settings are basic and offer absolutely no customization. I repeat, this is Crysis, damnit.

-No console commands? I'm extremely glad you took that out, who needs a useful tool for viewing display information? (Sarcasm implied.)

-Lastly, the console dominance. It's quite obvious that the consoles "stole" the spotlight with Crysis 2. CryTek and EA definitely went for the money on this one, and along this choice, they abandoned what made Crysis what it is today. Without the original fans, there wouldn't even be a Crysis 2. The PC fans have been abandoned for a wider wallet.

Of all the games to release so poorly, why Crysis 2?
(Console port? More than likely.)


Post what you find disappointing.

console commands are they except there isnt as many as the original crysis.

Altered console commands.*

Surprised no one has said anything about the absolute **** MP servers. Namely, how you can put a clip into someone, then die when they shoot you twice while you're reloading.

Multiplayer isn't a primary concern for me.

Is it me or can i not display fps anymore in SP?

-fuzz

I can't either.

motion blur, no sli support, motion blur did i mention motion blur needs to be removable? it cant even max out a gtx 295 .....the card barely gets warm......the graphics look too console like not crisp and clean like warhead and crysis 1. this game is reallllly sad honestly