who else thinks that crysis 2 looks better then the other ma

Post » Sun Feb 08, 2009 6:07 pm

Killzone 3 looks slightly better with graphics. It also seems more tactical.
User avatar
Matthew Aaron Evans
 
Posts: 3361
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 2:59 am

Post » Sun Feb 08, 2009 10:12 pm

Crysis 2 looks the best game i've ever seen because of graphics, technology, 3D, and what you can do for example go invisible.
It already makes call of duty look rubbish.
User avatar
Fanny Rouyé
 
Posts: 3316
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 9:47 am

Post » Sun Feb 08, 2009 4:53 pm

Guys is it just me or does call of duty blackops look like it has the same gameplay as cod 4,cod 5 and cod 6 and they all got boring after awhile so why would u sit there and get exicted for this one all it is is different skins and sounds. And im not gonna lie halo reach looks fun but it also looks like it can get boring after 2 months. And moh afghanistan looks good like it could be good for a long time so u know what personally i think medal of honor afghanistan and crysis 2 are gonna be the biggest wins of this year. I just wish crytek didnt postpone it till march 22nd If anyone from crytek ever reads this can you tell me why u postponed it till march 22nd
User avatar
cheryl wright
 
Posts: 3382
Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2006 4:43 am

Post » Mon Feb 09, 2009 2:38 am

Halo Reach will not be crysis 1 or 2 crysis is better
User avatar
Casey
 
Posts: 3376
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2007 8:38 am

Post » Sun Feb 08, 2009 5:36 pm

i still think that crysis 1 has better graphics than halo reach
User avatar
Queen Bitch
 
Posts: 3312
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 2:43 pm

Post » Mon Feb 09, 2009 6:56 am

Halo reach does not look that good at all.
Black ops is still using the outdated Quake 3 (idtech 3) engine which IW kept improving over and over in every cod game.

I think Crysis 2 (on pc) will be the top in graphics , just like Crysis 1 is.
User avatar
Marine x
 
Posts: 3327
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2007 4:54 am

Post » Sun Feb 08, 2009 4:06 pm

[quote]Crysis 2, Rage, Bulletstorm, Gears of War 3 are all looking pretty amazing graphics wise, but I'll save my judgment until I can see them on my own TV in glorious HD![/quote]

When u use a gamerpc as platform and your tv as monitor its at least possible. But with a console u will never see Crysis 2 in true full hd.
Upscaling my friend .. upscaling.. the only way to achieve full hd on consoles nowadays.

[quote]I think its funny that crysis is still used as a benchmark today, and even with a $2000USD PC, they still don't try it with AA turned on![/quote]

Thats rubbish.. even i can play it with my Gtx 280 in 1680*1024 with 2X AA. And with a Gtx 295 or the fermi generation you can even play it in full hd w ith 16XAA and get acceptable framerates.
User avatar
Daniel Brown
 
Posts: 3463
Joined: Fri May 04, 2007 11:21 am

Post » Mon Feb 09, 2009 6:55 am

[quote]i still think that crysis 1 has better graphics than halo reach[/quote] no way, LOL, halo looks soo awesome and i heard it runs at double-HD resolution and has more polygons in one texture than the cell processor could anti aliase, xbox 360 best console!

-.- of course crysis is still the best looking game in existence and that shouldn't surprise anyone since the only game that ever officially attempted to beat it was far cry 2 and it failed. stalker has potential but their engine has major flaws (like an outdated way of rendering player arms+gun or weird, unpleasant overall lighting to name just a few). also its AI isn't convincing in the slightest (say against crysis what you will, stalker's enemies are little more than omniscient cheaters), and the sound design is ridiculous. incase anyone wonders why all the hate for stalker - i'm just tired of people bringing it up as an example for a well-made game because it really isn't.
User avatar
Amy Gibson
 
Posts: 3540
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 2:11 pm

Post » Mon Feb 09, 2009 12:53 am

if crysis 1 was on xbox as well...
User avatar
Dean Ashcroft
 
Posts: 3566
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 1:20 am

Post » Sun Feb 08, 2009 10:27 pm

[quote]if crysis 1 was on xbox as well...[/quote]

Its technically impossible.

The game is constructed to have wide draw disctances and an enormous
amount of detail. This kind of detail and draw distance cant be achieved on consoles. Not even with Cryengine 3.
User avatar
Anthony Diaz
 
Posts: 3474
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2007 11:24 pm

Post » Sun Feb 08, 2009 11:07 pm

Ghost Recon - Future Soldier and Brink are up there as well. But you cannot Black Ops, MW2 to game like Crysis 2. Crysis 2 hands down in every way!
User avatar
christelle047
 
Posts: 3407
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 12:50 pm

Post » Sun Feb 08, 2009 6:02 pm

CRYSIS 2 IS MY FAVORITE GAME AND IT LOOKS LIKE IT HAS THE BEST GRAPHICS! THERE ARE OTHER AMAZING GAMES COMING SOON WITH AWESOME GRAPHICS LIKE THE NEW GHOST RECON,DEUS EX,MEDAL OF HONOR,CALL OF DUTY BLACK OPS AND OTHER GREAT GAMES!
User avatar
Rob Smith
 
Posts: 3424
Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2007 5:30 pm

Post » Sun Feb 08, 2009 11:20 pm

Agree... Crysis2 will look graphically better that its competition, thats what Crytek is about, no doubt !
User avatar
GPMG
 
Posts: 3507
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 10:55 am

Post » Mon Feb 09, 2009 6:09 am

i'll get black ops just to kill time until crysis 2 come out, then i'll forget it ever existed :)
User avatar
CxvIII
 
Posts: 3329
Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 10:35 pm

Post » Sun Feb 08, 2009 9:18 pm

Its a cross between the last guardian and crysis 2
User avatar
Penny Wills
 
Posts: 3474
Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2006 6:16 pm

Post » Sun Feb 08, 2009 9:17 pm

^^ but both are different types of games and so each has it's own graphical advantages.
User avatar
Danny Warner
 
Posts: 3400
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2007 3:26 am

Post » Mon Feb 09, 2009 5:34 am

srsly this guy sounds like he just wants lots of comments so he asked a question about how good it is, oldest trick in the book! but I do agree it is an epic looking game!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
User avatar
Blaine
 
Posts: 3456
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 4:24 pm

Previous

Return to Crysis