*yawn* Boring article. Just a plain rant, nothing more. Very one-sided, too.
Facts generally are one-sided
No, facts are unbiased.
Also true, I meant they're one-sided as in there is no argument to be made. Kinda like laws of physics. What the guy said, and keep in mind this wasn't a review (which he mentioned) was the current issues why the game is a disappointment to PC Gamers. We were told we'd get something, and we didn't. I'm really just speaking about the graphics-side of the game. I think the game looks beautiful, but better than Crysis? No, just flat out "no". To date, there is still not a game that looks as good as Crysis did/does. If Crysis 2 truly does have the framework for DX11, and Crytek is just optimizing it before enabling it in a patch, great! At that point, the game will surely be the next graphical benchmark and beat its predecessor. The graphical tweaks would be a nice addition too.