Good article.

Post » Wed Mar 04, 2009 1:39 am

http://www.dasreviews.com/das-latest-greatest/crytek-doomed-crysis-2s-pc-version/

While I don't agree it doomed the game, I believe this article does accurately point out the major disappointments (read: not "bugs", we all knew the Day 1 game would be buggy, it's how PC games always are) of PC Gamers with Crysis 2. As far as I am concerned these are not complaints so much as they are just plain facts. There's nothing in here that you can just say is an "opinion", all of this really happened, and it is a disappointment.
User avatar
James Potter
 
Posts: 3418
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2007 11:40 am

Post » Tue Mar 03, 2009 9:23 pm

I still think it is a great game but I am disappointed in Crytek. They have done a great injustice to their reputation of pushing the PC limits.
User avatar
Claudia Cook
 
Posts: 3450
Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2006 10:22 am

Post » Wed Mar 04, 2009 2:21 am

I actually think is has doomed the game for the PC community... and it is sad
User avatar
Chloe Lou
 
Posts: 3476
Joined: Sat Nov 04, 2006 2:08 am

Post » Wed Mar 04, 2009 5:35 am

DOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOMED
User avatar
Channing
 
Posts: 3393
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 4:05 pm

Post » Wed Mar 04, 2009 4:29 am

*yawn* Boring article. Just a plain rant, nothing more. Very one-sided, too.
User avatar
lucile
 
Posts: 3371
Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 4:37 pm

Post » Wed Mar 04, 2009 4:47 am

*yawn* Boring article. Just a plain rant, nothing more. Very one-sided, too.
Like official reviewers aren't one-sided either. Right.
User avatar
Miss K
 
Posts: 3458
Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 2:33 pm

Post » Wed Mar 04, 2009 3:53 am

*yawn* Boring article. Just a plain rant, nothing more. Very one-sided, too.

Facts generally are one-sided :-)
User avatar
Claire Vaux
 
Posts: 3485
Joined: Sun Aug 06, 2006 6:56 am

Post » Wed Mar 04, 2009 7:30 am

*yawn* Boring article. Just a plain rant, nothing more. Very one-sided, too.

Facts generally are one-sided :-)


No, facts are unbiased.
User avatar
Michelle Serenity Boss
 
Posts: 3341
Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 10:49 am

Post » Tue Mar 03, 2009 8:23 pm

I also miss POM... such a great tech and it's not in there :S I've been looking at some of the mods they mention. They look amazing indeed. Some of those modders should have been hired for Crysis 2!
User avatar
Yung Prince
 
Posts: 3373
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2007 10:45 pm

Post » Tue Mar 03, 2009 4:55 pm

*yawn* Boring article. Just a plain rant, nothing more. Very one-sided, too.
Like official reviewers aren't one-sided either. Right.

A good reviewer stresses both positive and negative aspects. Right.
User avatar
Dj Matty P
 
Posts: 3398
Joined: Sat Jun 09, 2007 12:31 am

Post » Tue Mar 03, 2009 6:29 pm

*yawn* Boring article. Just a plain rant, nothing more. Very one-sided, too.

Facts generally are one-sided :-)


No, facts are unbiased.

Also true, I meant they're one-sided as in there is no argument to be made. Kinda like laws of physics. What the guy said, and keep in mind this wasn't a review (which he mentioned) was the current issues why the game is a disappointment to PC Gamers. We were told we'd get something, and we didn't. I'm really just speaking about the graphics-side of the game. I think the game looks beautiful, but better than Crysis? No, just flat out "no". To date, there is still not a game that looks as good as Crysis did/does. If Crysis 2 truly does have the framework for DX11, and Crytek is just optimizing it before enabling it in a patch, great! At that point, the game will surely be the next graphical benchmark and beat its predecessor. The graphical tweaks would be a nice addition too.
User avatar
Nienna garcia
 
Posts: 3407
Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2007 3:23 am


Return to Crysis