Looks like I was right!

Post » Fri Mar 06, 2009 1:02 am

Thank god this guy found a forum to voice his opinion. This forum is all facts, and absolutely no opinion/speculation/smug celebration. I WANT MORE COMPLAINING!
User avatar
Jonny
 
Posts: 3508
Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2007 9:04 am

Post » Fri Mar 06, 2009 6:17 am

(Crytek)Points finger at fanbois ----> HAHAHAHAHAHA

Look at them!

They still believe we delivered good ****!

Hahaha lets make some more console games and port them to pc, since some "noobs" still like it, saves us monies!
User avatar
Alyesha Neufeld
 
Posts: 3421
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2007 10:45 am

Post » Fri Mar 06, 2009 11:54 am

Ehhhh, I dont know were you found that part about the "PC hardare market in Europe" but, I live in Europe, and I havn't seen a single thing change in the hardware market, except that we get new technology, and peaople buy it. I live in Norway, and I had a powerful gaming PC about 6 moths, then I switched to a Asus G74JH for about 6 months ago.

So atleast for me, I would prefered a High-End game again, but also Crysis 1 is like the best looking game still.
But I still would have had a new game which set the standards in high graphics for another 4 years.

The point I was making is that more folks are unemployed since the release of the original Crysis, and the employment situation is worse in the EU than in the US (except in the EU public sector).

And further, are you comparing the Crysis of today (after three patches) with the Launch Day Crysis 2, or are you comparing LD Crysis and LD Crysis 2? (I seriously doubt the latter, as on the day of launch Crysis did NOT have a working x64 patch - in fact, the first patch for the original didn't fix that issue.)

Lastly, I did point out that Crysis 2 is not about high-end gaming PCs (for once), as the original Crysis was; after all, what the heck does Crytek have to prove by repeating themselves?
User avatar
Cat Haines
 
Posts: 3385
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 9:27 am

Previous

Return to Crysis