Rate the multiplayer

Post » Wed Jul 08, 2009 10:26 am

I'm just curious to see how people are liking the multiplayer. Just post a score between 1-10 and leave some comments
User avatar
Trevi
 
Posts: 3404
Joined: Fri Apr 06, 2007 8:26 pm

Post » Wed Jul 08, 2009 10:06 am

7

Just because it's my favorite number.
User avatar
evelina c
 
Posts: 3377
Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2006 4:28 pm

Post » Tue Jul 07, 2009 10:17 pm

8, random bugs shy from a 9/10, don't care about the lag as I have had none out of about 200 games.
User avatar
NAkeshIa BENNETT
 
Posts: 3519
Joined: Fri Jun 16, 2006 12:23 pm

Post » Wed Jul 08, 2009 1:56 pm

better than i had anticipated, although not quite as polished as COD. certainly miles above homefront though. 7.5-8ish. when bugs are fixed 8.5.
User avatar
Shiarra Curtis
 
Posts: 3393
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 3:22 pm

Post » Wed Jul 08, 2009 4:25 am

7.5 ( Bugs and other obvious / not obvious problems killing it )
User avatar
Donald Richards
 
Posts: 3378
Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2007 3:59 am

Post » Wed Jul 08, 2009 8:47 am

6.5/10 right now
9/10 with improved controls and connectivity issues
User avatar
Cayal
 
Posts: 3398
Joined: Tue Jan 30, 2007 6:24 pm

Post » Wed Jul 08, 2009 7:47 am

6.8 because the games don't have dedicated servers. It's like CoD but with a nanosuit.
User avatar
Jesus Lopez
 
Posts: 3508
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2007 10:16 pm

Post » Wed Jul 08, 2009 7:08 am

2/10... It's a laggy unbalanced game riddled with bugs, thanks Crytek for not polishing the console version/giving us dedicated servers.
User avatar
Rebekah Rebekah Nicole
 
Posts: 3477
Joined: Fri Oct 13, 2006 8:47 pm

Post » Wed Jul 08, 2009 4:16 am

I'de rate it an 8.5-9/10. I don't get any Lag at all and the map layouts are far more polished and usable than CoD. One tiny niggle with the Lazer Sight, its so under-powered because people spot you from a mile away with it. Only had two issues with the hit detection out of 30 games. It is amazing.
User avatar
Sami Blackburn
 
Posts: 3306
Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2006 7:56 am

Post » Wed Jul 08, 2009 4:51 am

I would have to give it a 8/10. . The ranking is a real grind though, besides that its good a few bugs though.
User avatar
Karl harris
 
Posts: 3423
Joined: Thu May 17, 2007 3:17 pm

Post » Wed Jul 08, 2009 6:20 am

8/10

A few bugs need to be ironed out; nothing out of the ordinary tbh, and a few things buffed *COUGH* AIR STOMP & LASER SIGHT * COUGH* and connection issues sorted..

After all that.

9.5/10 :)
User avatar
Tiff Clark
 
Posts: 3297
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 2:23 am

Post » Wed Jul 08, 2009 2:23 pm

better than i had anticipated, although not quite as polished as COD. certainly miles above homefront though. 7.5-8ish. when bugs are fixed 8.5.

Imo homefronts multiplayer is better. Crysis 2 is to much like CoD.
User avatar
Megan Stabler
 
Posts: 3420
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 2:03 pm

Post » Wed Jul 08, 2009 9:49 am

I say a 2 as well because of no dedicated servers and lots of lag/hit detection issues. When these get fixed I'll give it an 8, until they do I'm going with a 1.5-2.
User avatar
Darlene DIllow
 
Posts: 3403
Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 5:34 am

Post » Wed Jul 08, 2009 2:59 pm

8/10 right now. Love the game. Once the bugs and latency are resolved ill give it a 9.0-9.5.
User avatar
FLYBOYLEAK
 
Posts: 3440
Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2007 6:41 am

Post » Wed Jul 08, 2009 10:36 am

Fix the hit detection.
Fix the lag.

Profit.

Hit detection is screwy even when hosting!
User avatar
Amelia Pritchard
 
Posts: 3445
Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2006 2:40 am

Post » Wed Jul 08, 2009 2:24 am

As of now 8, when they fix the connection issue is a 10+
User avatar
Jessica Colville
 
Posts: 3349
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 6:53 pm


Return to Crysis