i think he means he is in favor of the ending being completely meaningless so he can have his meaningless post-end grinding.

well yeah, thats a given, but you can still do everything for the faction you're working for and thensome, and then go to Hoover Dam. Not like you have a time limit. :shrug:

That and meaningless trophies.

Play to have fun or dont play at all I say. :shrug: At the end of the day thats all that counts, not a bunch of trophies/acheivements and "bragging rights".

Yes and some endings are better than others.

Like Yes Mans if you play the game with Arcade being your advisor.

I agree. I honostly didn't like the Yes Man ending.

To be honest, I think it would be interesting to play a post-game DLC that takes into account your ending.
Just a short bit of content, say a few hours worth of gameplay.
Though, the scenario for this in my head would have you create and play an additional character- not the Courier.

No i was kinda thinking like you know NCR.

NCR are evil bloodsvcking tyrants, if you do everything to Arcades liking, you have a great ending.

It be a better ending if Arcade would bring together the Enclave and try to get them forming again.

In your opinion.

Bethesda should look at what Obsidian did and implement some of it into their fo. Plus IMO they should keep Obsidian making them as well to cover more ground.

You can t look ag fo3 as all Bethesda can do with fo. As I ve said 1 000 000 times, Bethesda had to make a game to attract millions of fans to the series. Fo3 was a intro/reboot without really rebooting.

That by the way sold millions and millions of copies in like 3 days, and won buckets of goty and high placed in all time awards.

I think its safe to say fo3 was a success.

Now of coarse some old fo devs are going to make a more fallouty fo then what Bethesda was doing with fo3.

We don t know what Bethesda has up their sleeves for fo.

I d be interested in seeing how much that one would cost and how long it would take to make it. It would still be worthless to me, because there would still be n canon ending.

How about they just make fo nv 2 that continues the story from the canon ending? Now that would make sense........

You know, what is so bad about not knowing the canon ending? At least we know what the endings entail, and we can speculate, and the endings are satisfying for the individual preferences of the player.

just do all the side questes which you want to do before completing the main story and you wont notice any difference
there will come time when you will get bored of exploring and side questes and then it does just do the last quest and finish game with definite ending
if you continue after ending you will get bored too and stop playing
same content and gameplay hours but i think its better to finish game with ending then just stop playing in middle of nothing when you get bored
if you want to play again just load save right before you completed main quest
so it's not big deal

The question is does it even matter what is the "canon" ending? If Bethesda sticks to the east coast (pure speculation on my part) and if Obsidian will do no more spin-offs will New Vegas region even be a part of future Fallouts?

Do your homework obsidian not gamesas (Y) and i prefer that the game ends, for me its better because you have an ending not just carrying on forever.
And the problem with 3 was the fact that we didnt know it was gunna end, it just NINJA'D us sooo yeah.