I mean this isn't about, aww the game isn't as good as we thought it would be its not as good as crysis 1. No they straight up LIED, and False Advertised to every one of us PC Gamers. This isn't a matter of opinion, It's cold hard facts. Their advertisemants told us it was a completely different game with totally different features and optimized for the pc. I mean if anyone else did this like say Corsair told you you could order a Black and Silver full size gaming case for $100 and then you order it and it arrives and you open it and its a red, mid size tower not made with any gaming features, so you call customer service to let them know there must have been a mix up and they tell you "no there was no mix up, sorry no refunds, ya we told you one thing and sold you something different" wouldn't that be illegal? Ok so I know a class action lawsuit is taking it pretty far but it's the point, I seriously think what they did here should be considered illegal.

This isn't me being mad or spouting out an opinion this is just the truth what I am going to say right here
----------------------------->THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT CRYTEK DID.

I'm pretty sure none of that matters. The EULA when buying the game that we all agreed to completely legitimizes them ripping us off 60$.
Whatever. I won't be buying from Crytek ever again. Just stick to EA's DICE, Valve, and Blizzard. They've never let me down.

Unfortunately, all of this stuff is probably covered in the EULA.

License agreements are evil, and unconstitutional.

Unfortunately anything they say about the game before it goes Gold is subject to change and they cannot be held accountable for it.
But they definitely decieved and mislead us and i'm glad i didn't get the Nano Edition after this fiasko.

I have actually seen a EULA changed up before... No one ever reads em, but I do read em sometimes. I tried to report it, but there was no proof of wrongdoing or some bullsh*t.

I was participating in an open beta for some MMO, and we were told for almost an entire year that the game was going to be released in late 2010... 2010 ended, the game still wasn't released, still in beta. Shortly after that, they announced the game was being shut down. The thing is, we were all led to believe this was a game that was coming out. They made virtual currency available for sale that could be purchased from the game's website for real money... Then the virtual currency could be used in-game. After announcing the game being shut down, they hastily added some stuff to their EULA, stating that they were under no obligation to give refunds to anyone who had bought it.

It was seriously underhanded of them. Unfortunately, we live in a world were corporations can do whatever they want, and the government doesn't regulate it.

Here is a video for you culture of litigation americans

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qlkQKuThjMs&NR=1&feature=fvwp

Its a game, and I hate loosing $60 like the next guy, but 95% of games are broken or svck, how have you not learned that yet?

What a pig that dude needs to get off his fat butt and get some exercise....and the rest of you guys always threatening litigation, get a life. Oh and if you don't like my comment, then sue me hahahah.

Here is a video for you culture of litigation americans

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qlkQKuThjMs&NR=1&feature=fvwp

Its a game, and I hate loosing $60 like the next guy, but 95% of games are broken or svck, how have you not learned that yet?

Because I don't buy all the games just the ones that are suppose to be the cream of the crop, for the kind I like. I expect some bugs on launch, but this is completely different and you know that.

What exactly were you lied to about? You say you were lied to, but don't point out any specific instances of it. I'm disappointed in some of the bugs, and wish the Sandbox 3 came with the game, but I don't know about being lied to.

So why not point out specific things that were said (with links to that place so others can research it) or advertisemants on youtube/elsewhere where you were flat out lied to. I'm not saying your wrong, but making claims like that without evidence is called slander, and is actually illegal in itself if you have no evidence for the statements of wrongdoing you claim have been done.

Seems like aliens vs predator all over again... and yeah, at this point I would exhaust myself sticking to anyone in charge.

Shouldn't there be a Class Action Lawsuit?

Yeah against you and everyone else like you wasting Crytek's time with useless rants. If they didn't have to hear all this crap they may be a little more responsive and actually work on fixing some issues, but as it stands now they are like people locked in their house by an mob comprised of zit faced teens screaming "WE WANT DX11, WE WANT DX11"

Shouldn't there be a Class Action Lawsuit?

Yeah against you and everyone else like you wasting Crytek's time with useless rants. If they didn't have to hear all this crap they may be a little more responsive and actually work on fixing some issues, but as it stands now they are like people locked in their house by an mob comprised of zit faced teens screaming "WE WANT DX11, WE WANT DX11"


Lol. What he said.

Shouldn't there be a Class Action Lawsuit?

Yeah against you and everyone else like you wasting Crytek's time with useless rants. If they didn't have to hear all this crap they may be a little more responsive and actually work on fixing some issues, but as it stands now they are like people locked in their house by an mob comprised of zit faced teens screaming "WE WANT DX11, WE WANT DX11"


Lol. What she said.

aye

I wish I could get my money back, but they're going to get away with this no doubt. I'll just end up throwing it away, no one would want to buy it anyway so whats the point. All I know is after i finished the campaign I was in such disgust I was happy to have it uninstalled from my PC right away. Crysis 1 is still there though, and it will stay there. But it SHOULD be illegal to do what they did.