Can't remember the name/s but I did see guns that had worse stats on everything. Where those guns created as an extra difficulty so when you think you are so good you have to pick a worse weapon as a handicap given o the opposition? Great idea...

im not sure how good the in-game stats are. for instance the carb9 seems the most deadly weapon in many areas. i now often have carb9 and blauspaum (or whatever) as my secondary. seems much better than an AR/SMG for some reason.

In game stat bars are WAY off in most circumstances, you'll get more accurate results basing it off experience & instinct.

Fact is, I don't think there's a single gun that's complete garbage and doesn't have it's niche or use. I hate the Euston and Tokmak and can rarely get the Carb to work in my favour beyond point-blank range, but a lot of people seem to adore them.

Except the Rokstedi. Town down the spread and then we'll talk.

i have stages of using the rokstedi. the problem is that a barret can kill much quicker and more accurately. and any other gun close range will be better. its definitely a niche weapon.

Magazine capacity is a stat that most people ignore.

Now I'm not the one for complaining, most problems i experience (If any) are taken with a pinch of salt. However yesterday i found myself getting annoyed at the shotgun damage as it took 4 blasts just to kill off a completely un buffed Lightweight :confused: i mean come on... a Lightweight? i could understand if my target was a medium.

It makes me wonder if the hit ratio on each pellet has any damage at all, shotguns are renowned for spread this is understandable but spread shouldn't come into the equation when the target was practically looking down the barrel. A few tweaks here and their should cure things like this I'm sure.

Yeah the menu stats on the Rokstedi look crap.. But when you use it, it will take medium in 3 bullets..