» Tue Jul 21, 2009 6:25 am
Who said anything about it being scary?
And who cares that it was religious beliefs that was the driving force. Hell, having a set, easy to understand, real reason for the main character to continue on his quest for 30 years, was a nice change of style compared to most movies.
It's not an action movie, even though there is some action.
Honestly, The movie played out very similar to Fallout 1 and 2, especially if the story takes place just after (30 yrs after) the war/bomb.
TAXman, reread what I posted, Fallout universe after the bomb/war not Fallout universe of the games. If you follow the Fallout universe, most mutants did not appear over night. Took a couple of generations, and 30 yrs is just barely a generation in that setting.
BraveRobot, don't get hung up over the religious part of the story background. Anything could have been easily used instead. Heck, you didnt even know it was religion until over 1/2 through the movie.
Again, IMHO, if you want to see a barren world, with limited food, water, few guns or vehicles, and the surviving people just starting to make towns, it is a good movie. Much different than the movie, The Road (of which the book was much better for story than the movie, but the movie drilled in the visuals of after the bomb.)
Well each to their own, I guess some just find fault in something and don't listen to others when they are attempting to point out some of the positives.
Dave Chase