Crytek we your former Pc fans dont love you anymore.

Post » Fri Nov 05, 2010 4:59 am

We love this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wdCjl7YeSOk&feature=related. Our last hope for Pc gaming survival. Now go and lick Micro$oft a...s....s with your xbox **** games.(like Crysis 2). And remember Battlefield 3 Pc version sales will exceed **** and **** versions.
User avatar
Eve(G)
 
Posts: 3546
Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2007 11:45 am

Post » Fri Nov 05, 2010 5:55 am

Image
User avatar
Stephanie I
 
Posts: 3357
Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2007 3:28 pm

Post » Fri Nov 05, 2010 1:02 pm

Image
User avatar
bimsy
 
Posts: 3541
Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 3:04 pm

Post » Fri Nov 05, 2010 5:33 pm

Image
User avatar
bonita mathews
 
Posts: 3405
Joined: Sun Aug 06, 2006 5:04 am

Post » Fri Nov 05, 2010 6:53 pm

Im gonna buy three copies of PC version of BF3
User avatar
Shelby McDonald
 
Posts: 3497
Joined: Sat Jan 13, 2007 2:29 pm

Post » Fri Nov 05, 2010 8:13 am

i agreed, f*k crytek, they care about money, not the gamers ...
User avatar
Nick Tyler
 
Posts: 3437
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2007 8:57 am

Post » Fri Nov 05, 2010 6:20 pm

done crying now? k, cya later
User avatar
cassy
 
Posts: 3368
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 12:57 am

Post » Fri Nov 05, 2010 7:05 am

What Battlefield 3 has to do with Crysis?
User avatar
Becky Palmer
 
Posts: 3387
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 4:43 am

Post » Fri Nov 05, 2010 7:15 am

What Battlefield 3 has to do with Crysis?

its a shooter mr wise guy? :)
last time BF was a bit behind Crysis. For BF 3 to be behind crysis 2 they really need to **** things up seriously.
I dont like BF so much and bought crysis 2 right away. This wont happen the next time... For me on PC Crysis 2 is a bid let down.
User avatar
jessica robson
 
Posts: 3436
Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2006 11:54 am

Post » Fri Nov 05, 2010 10:00 am

crytek is the devolper. EA was the one pushing fo pc and consoles. Ea is the major backer in this, and you think they are just going to release the pc version. Your nutz. And i believe when crysis 1 came out there were alot of people complaning they couldnt even run it on there pc, Now crysis 2 comes out with we will say a little more freindly to all pc owners and you get people biching about that now. EA, once again EA should be the one people are pissed. Not crytek...... If i were EA i would of made it for all consoles and pc because people will buy it...... If this was just released for the pc, with all your amazing graphics you want this game would of sold about a quarter of what this game sold. Your taking out the consoles, and some pc people that wont be able to afford an upgrade for there pc. The only thing i would of done diff. is maybe extend the deadline to iron out a little more bugs
User avatar
MarilĂș
 
Posts: 3449
Joined: Sat Oct 07, 2006 7:17 am

Post » Fri Nov 05, 2010 2:47 pm

crytek is the devolper. EA was the one pushing fo pc and consoles. Ea is the major backer in this, and you think they are just going to release the pc version. Your nutz. And i believe when crysis 1 came out there were alot of people complaning they couldnt even run it on there pc, Now crysis 2 comes out with we will say a little more freindly to all pc owners and you get people biching about that now. EA, once again EA should be the one people are pissed. Not crytek...... If i were EA i would of made it for all consoles and pc because people will buy it...... If this was just released for the pc, with all your amazing graphics you want this game would of sold about a quarter of what this game sold. Your taking out the consoles, and some pc people that wont be able to afford an upgrade for there pc. The only thing i would of done diff. is maybe extend the deadline to iron out a little more bugs

Thing is, EA also produces Battlefield. How come DICE develops a PC version of their game that takes advantage of PC hardware, while Crytek spits out a 'not-a-port. multiplatform.' game that has less pc options and compatibility than any port ever made?

This makes your argument false.

Edit: Oh, and Farcry and Crysis gameplay > Nanosuit of Duty. C2 is a spinoff.
User avatar
Liv Brown
 
Posts: 3358
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 11:44 pm

Post » Fri Nov 05, 2010 12:47 pm

crytek is the devolper. EA was the one pushing fo pc and consoles. Ea is the major backer in this, and you think they are just going to release the pc version. Your nutz. And i believe when crysis 1 came out there were alot of people complaning they couldnt even run it on there pc, Now crysis 2 comes out with we will say a little more freindly to all pc owners and you get people biching about that now. EA, once again EA should be the one people are pissed. Not crytek...... If i were EA i would of made it for all consoles and pc because people will buy it...... If this was just released for the pc, with all your amazing graphics you want this game would of sold about a quarter of what this game sold. Your taking out the consoles, and some pc people that wont be able to afford an upgrade for there pc. The only thing i would of done diff. is maybe extend the deadline to iron out a little more bugs

Thing is, EA also produces Battlefield. How come DICE develops a PC version of their game that takes advantage of PC hardware, while Crytek spits out a 'not-a-port. multiplatform.' game that has less pc options and compatibility than any port ever made?

This makes your argument false.

Edit: Oh, and Farcry and Crysis gameplay > Nanosuit of Duty. C2 is a spinoff.
what are the minimum pc requirements for BF 3 for the pc? Will people that meet the minimum requirements for crysis 2 be able to play BF 3?
User avatar
Leilene Nessel
 
Posts: 3428
Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2007 2:11 am

Post » Fri Nov 05, 2010 8:06 pm

what are the minimum pc requirements for BF 3 for the pc? Will people that meet the minimum requirements for crysis 2 be able to play BF 3?

They wouldn't drop DX9 even if it was a PC exclusive. C2 dropped so much content and features to achieve it's glorious 'optimization' I'm not sure we can even call it optimization rather than reduction... While BF3 will probably only add on to previous, which is probably a bit heavier on the puter. But who knows, we'll see.

The comparison just proves the point, C2 is a spinoff.
User avatar
Rusty Billiot
 
Posts: 3431
Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2007 10:22 pm

Post » Fri Nov 05, 2010 11:16 am

I disagree, why you are talking from the side of many peoples, since you are only one. The crysis game is very good. It is hard to tell if it will be better than Battlefield since this game is still in development and it will be newer than crysis. So
maybe the only mistake that crytek did that they did advertised the game as DX11 , apart of this it is a great title.
User avatar
Elizabeth Falvey
 
Posts: 3347
Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 1:37 am

Post » Fri Nov 05, 2010 7:02 pm

this is wasting my money to buy a crytek's product....never happen it again !!never!
User avatar
sally coker
 
Posts: 3349
Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2006 7:51 pm

Post » Fri Nov 05, 2010 5:57 pm

I am not disappointed.You cannot compare crysis 1 to crysis 2 because crysis 2 is a PC GAME and crysis 1 is a super computer game.Crysis 1 is fun to play only if you have a $2000 to $ 3000 monster machines.Only a few minor PC gamers have that type of rigs.90% of the pc gamers own only below 150$ cards.It was a huge mistake to develop a eye candy unplayable game to satisfy the minority gamers(this is what happend to crysis 1) Crytek did a really good job by optimizing these game for REAL PC GAMERS instead of satisfying millionaires.
User avatar
Allison Sizemore
 
Posts: 3492
Joined: Wed Jul 19, 2006 6:09 am

Post » Fri Nov 05, 2010 7:26 am

i trusted in you! crytek until that i saw pirates in official servers!
User avatar
Emily Jones
 
Posts: 3425
Joined: Mon Jul 17, 2006 3:33 pm

Post » Fri Nov 05, 2010 12:00 pm

I disagree, why you are talking from the side of many peoples, since you are only one. The crysis game is very good. It is hard to tell if it will be better than Battlefield since this game is still in development and it will be newer than crysis. So
maybe the only mistake that crytek did that they did advertised the game as DX11 , apart of this it is a great title.

It's a matter of preference, of course. And so is if you don't consider straight out lying about the content of the game a mistake, to the audience. PC fans of the previous titles, to be exact. If it makes you feel any better, just imagine 'marketing' instead of every 'lie' word you read on this forum.

But that does not change the sad facts about this game on PC, or it's sad relation to it's predecessors. It's an alright game and those into CoD enjoy this most probably, too. But it's not what they sold to the PC fans.
User avatar
Oscar Vazquez
 
Posts: 3418
Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2007 12:08 pm

Post » Fri Nov 05, 2010 2:27 pm

I am not disappointed.You cannot compare crysis 1 to crysis 2 because crysis 2 is a PC GAME and crysis 1 is a super computer game.Crysis 1 is fun to play only if you have a $2000 to $ 3000 monster machines.Only a few minor PC gamers have that type of rigs.90% of the pc gamers own only below 150$ cards.It was a huge mistake to develop a eye candy unplayable game to satisfy the minority gamers(this is what happend to crysis 1) Crytek did a really good job by optimizing these game for REAL PC GAMERS instead of satisfying millionaires.

eeh.. PC gamer were so silly when Crysis 1 came out.
They tried to set the settings to "High", because they thought "oh hey, my rig is so new, it should run".
But now we are in 2011!!!!!!!!
4 years after Crysis 1 our rigs should be MAXIMUM POWERFUL.
Cevat said in 2007, that probably the game can only be maxed out in 2 or 3 years.
Why do people just don't set the game to 'Low' or 'Middle' and enjoy the fancy graphics?
On High its MAXIMUM GRAPHICS

Btw. Crysis 2 should be the same, Low & Middle for bad rigs and High & Very High for good rigs.. sad :(

CRYTEK, where are you?!?!
User avatar
marina
 
Posts: 3401
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2007 10:02 pm

Post » Fri Nov 05, 2010 5:56 am

Man, one cannot argue with your point of view here.
Suppose the console became more popular because of not worrying about upgrading every six months or so. Gamers related to it, and of course good marketing. Well actually the main stream gaming unit back in the day were hand helds and then consoles (Atari mostly). Still its hard to swallow a nicely chocolate coated carrot (Crysis) and have it made into an asparagus (crysis2).

crytek is the devolper. EA was the one pushing fo pc and consoles. Ea is the major backer in this, and you think they are just going to release the pc version. Your nutz. And i believe when crysis 1 came out there were alot of people complaning they couldnt even run it on there pc, Now crysis 2 comes out with we will say a little more freindly to all pc owners and you get people biching about that now. EA, once again EA should be the one people are pissed. Not crytek...... If i were EA i would of made it for all consoles and pc because people will buy it...... If this was just released for the pc, with all your amazing graphics you want this game would of sold about a quarter of what this game sold. Your taking out the consoles, and some pc people that wont be able to afford an upgrade for there pc. The only thing i would of done diff. is maybe extend the deadline to iron out a little more bugs
User avatar
Aaron Clark
 
Posts: 3439
Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 2:23 pm

Post » Fri Nov 05, 2010 7:15 pm

crytek is the devolper. EA was the one pushing fo pc and consoles. Ea is the major backer in this, and you think they are just going to release the pc version. Your nutz. And i believe when crysis 1 came out there were alot of people complaning they couldnt even run it on there pc, Now crysis 2 comes out with we will say a little more freindly to all pc owners and you get people biching about that now. EA, once again EA should be the one people are pissed. Not crytek...... If i were EA i would of made it for all consoles and pc because people will buy it...... If this was just released for the pc, with all your amazing graphics you want this game would of sold about a quarter of what this game sold. Your taking out the consoles, and some pc people that wont be able to afford an upgrade for there pc. The only thing i would of done diff. is maybe extend the deadline to iron out a little more bugs

Exactly, also blame EA for being cheap bastards and making multiplayer with gamespy, *cough* MP crack in less then a week *cough* I'm never going to buy another Crysis game, why should I? When I can DL it and enjoy just like someone who actually paid 60$ for it.

Also I don't give a **** about the graphics. What really pissed me off that I bought the game and some other **** on my steam friend list played the game with a crack and joined my room, then aimbotted everyone.
Seriously, they don't even have a ban function? I see around 20 hackers each day that ruins the fun for everyone -.-
User avatar
Emily Jones
 
Posts: 3425
Joined: Mon Jul 17, 2006 3:33 pm


Return to Crysis