» Thu Aug 13, 2009 12:56 pm
This is just my opinion... but.
Fallout 1 was the best, the reasons are simply due to the storyline, whilst FO2 improved on every aspect it couldn't top the story of 1.
Fallout 2 was superior in terms of what you could do, for example you had far more control over your NPC's in fallout 2, plus far more weapons were available and many more mods exist for the game (try out www.killap.net restoration project). However like I said the storyline in FO1 was just so much better, it had more of that Mad max theme too it and Junktown was great.
Tactics was a pile of crap, its fun yeah but so much of the storyline from the previous two gets twisted and messed up, for example the calculator and vault 0, the whole Enclave/Vault Tek evil storyline is removed, also the Origins of the Brotherhood of Steel are just "we came out of a vault!" in Tactics, whilst Fallout cannon states they're from the survivors of Mariprosa (You can visit this in FO1 btw, which rocks). ALso things like Petrol/Gasoline are in Tactics and things like WW2 and more modern weapons. Tactics was a pile of crap.
Of course then we have B.O.S ... aka P.O.S, explaining this game is like.... Did you ever play Baldurs gate, then hear about Baldurs gate: Dark alliance?. Basicly its a worthless piece of crap action game.
FO3 is different, it doesnt have the Fallout dark humor which really svcks, nor does it have a convincing storyline, that said its pretty and fun, if Bethesda actually end up making the DLC available to everyone i'll be happy, if they dont then they seriously shouldnt have bought the rights.