Did I hallucinate reading these posts by the devs? : Crysis

» Tue Mar 29, 2011 9:14 am

and crysis 2 bugs are inferior to crysis 1's bugs! lol

» Tue Mar 29, 2011 5:59 am

Anyone who thinks Crysis 1/ Warhead, even with all the photorealism and texture mods in the world - looks better than Crysis 2, has no idea what they're talking about

» Mon Mar 28, 2011 11:11 pm

^^Forget all those photorealisn and texture mods, crysis 1 and warhead look way better than 2.

» Tue Mar 29, 2011 7:04 am

LOL, No need to apologize for Crysis 2 people!

» Tue Mar 29, 2011 6:12 am

the only thing that does look better in Crysis 2 are the nanosuit itself, the weaponry and the aliens. everything else is just pretty mediocre compared to Crysis 1

» Mon Mar 28, 2011 10:08 pm

LOL, No need to apologize for Crysis 2 people!

Yeah, we'll let the devs do that.

» Tue Mar 29, 2011 9:26 am

I thought I hallucinated I got a dx10 patch and the gfx were amazing. The difference was huge..............Then i realised I had just clicked the Crysis 1 icon, not the crysis 2 one.

lol... had to

I played warhead last night. 1920 x 1080 settings maxed. Crysis 2 looks better. A lot better.

Not at all...

Once you look past the (plenty) downright terrible textures in Crysis you wil also see that most of the physics and procedural destruction vanished. Even after getting past the 2d foliage and clutter you still have to face the fact that most of the objects in the world are baked straight into the levels not to mention the pastered quality of it. This is literally a case of getting away with it because the game is more shiney and oversaturated.

Obviousy if you want really good Crysis results you need to tweak the cfg but doing the very same thing in Crysis 2 does'nt realy help the game at all.

Also Crysis 1 screenshots do not do the game justice. Crysis 2 screenshots do it justice and then a few favours to boot.