Have the gaming focused media made any responses to our outcry?

I haven't seen any game related news sites taking notice to how Crytek is keeping shut over the demand for ANY respons to the requests for a DX11 patch, or general answers to the state of this so called PC game- we all realized this is a console port.

Do you think its another case of better deals/ad payment for high scoring reviews? I am 100% sure that any gamer with experience with Crysis 1 would realize what kind of game the sequel actually is, and still the sequel scored fairley well in reviews, pc version as well.

I'm a little ticked that PC gamer Mag gave it a huge write up and review as good as they did.

Most review sites (at least the popular ones) have sold out years ago and give high ratings for games just because the companies PAY them too.

Pro-tip = Consider everyone of those sites is talking out of their ass.

Cases of bought scores have been heard of. I wish that it was unheard of

Daddy Gates' money can buy a lot of good reviews.

Most review sites (at least the popular ones) have sold out years ago and give high ratings for games just because the companies PAY them too.

Pro-tip = Consider everyone of those sites is talking out of their ass.
They actually give comprehensive reasoning and factual evidence in the reviews. You kids just whine and exaggerate everything in the hopes that papa Crytek or mama EA will listen to you. You never once give solid reasoning and constantly use blanket statements. For example, not stating why the reviews themselves are wrong. Instead, you make up an utterly stupid idea that all the editors are bribed and nothing they say can be true.

this might answer http://arstechnica.com/gaming/news/2011/04/playing-against-the-gods-how-the-press-reviews-multiplayer-games.ars

6.6 from user reviews at metacritic. No rage-votes, because first days the game was above the 8.