The game has been out for a month now, I'm sure most of you have already played it.

Now how would you rate the game?

Its just another video game
BUT
its still a major disappointment based on expectations.

So its a mix of 2 and 4.

Where's the accurate statement of 'good, but not better than crysis 1'. The game in no stretch of the word is bad, it's just not as good as crysis.

The only options you have here are Epic win and 3 "Bads". What about Good; Above Average but not as good as the original?

alright then, on scale of 1-10

Well Let's see:

In perspective:

Original Crysis: 9/10 (it had its flaws)
Crysis: Warhead: 9.5/10 (would be 10 but was too short)
Crysis 2: 8.5/10 (It does have its advantages over the original but its fair share of flaws)
CoD Black Ops: 6/10
Battlefield BC2: 8.5/10 (Because of **** campaign)

Overall, despite all the biching, it isn't a bad game. One of the better ones among recent titles.

Well Let's see:
[...]

Crysis 2: 8.5/10

Battlefield BC2: 8.5/10


That's ****, BC2 is way better than 'no final boss' crysis 2.
Really crysis 2 ending was pathetic, push this key to crawl push this key to walk, piss off.

Well Let's see:
[...]

Crysis 2: 8.5/10

Battlefield BC2: 8.5/10


That's ****, BC2 is way better than 'no final boss' crysis 2.
Really crysis 2 ending was pathetic, push this key to crawl push this key to walk, piss off.

Ok the ending was subpar...every single part of the BC2 campaign svcked ass besides the end.

Epic.

Well Let's see:
[...]

Crysis 2: 8.5/10

Battlefield BC2: 8.5/10


That's ****, BC2 is way better than 'no final boss' crysis 2.
Really crysis 2 ending was pathetic, push this key to crawl push this key to walk, piss off.

Ok the ending was subpar...every single part of the BC2 campaign svcked ass besides the end.

However, the bc2 multiplayer is several light years ahead of crysis 2's, and battlefield has never been about single player.

I'd say it's a little more special than just any other game, the K-Volt is a great weapon and apart from the 'tactical options' linear corridor bs the gameplay is very enjoyable and quite unique.
It's been collecting dust on the shelve since we found out it's a dx9 console game, but looking forwards to re-playing when it's finished, playing crysis vanilla right now, max settings, that and BC2.

I gave it an Epic Win for the story line and what they were able to do with DX9 on the graphics scaling. Could of fooled me if I had to guess what DX version was being used. I would never have thought it was DX9. Also the intergration of the nanosuit mudules and modes made it unique and your nanosuit can be built to you finger print that can be a counter to another setup.

Yes I felt I was robbed when I found out DX11 was not in C2. Putting my anger aside I had to rule it as an Epic Win

[

That's ****, BC2 is way better than 'no final boss' crysis 2.
Really crysis 2 ending was pathetic, push this key to crawl push this key to walk, piss off.

Ok the ending was subpar...every single part of the BC2 campaign svcked ass besides the end.

However, the bc2 multiplayer is several light years ahead of crysis 2's, and battlefield has never been about single player.

So what? I'm rating these games as a whole. Since they included a campaign, I'm rating it as a whole. That's a dumb excuse really. If they didn't want me to play the campaign why the heck did they waste their time making one? They could have used the extra GBs for better textures or a few more MP naps.

And honestly now that I think of it, Crysis 2 should actually be rated higher than BC2, if SP and MP are weighted equally:

Crysis 2:

Great singleplayer, decent multiplayer.

BC2:

Absolutely terrible campaign, great multiplayer.

And don't even bother comparing graphics between the 2 games. The only part of BC2 that actually looked good was the particle/dust effects. Otherwise the textures were subpar, shadows were disconcertingly low resolution (this part really pissed me off, FFS Black Ops had a higher shader resolution than BC2), lighting and models were nothing to boast about, water was this static ****. However I wont take off points because of the mass destruction. In the multiplayer the only maps that looked good were the desert ones and tropical ones (Atacama Desert, Laguna Presa, etc.). Snow maps were just an overblown bloom-fest, and the grassy maps had really weird coloring that made them look bad.

Well Let's see:
[...]

Crysis 2: 8.5/10

Battlefield BC2: 8.5/10


That's ****, BC2 is way better than 'no final boss' crysis 2.
Really crysis 2 ending was pathetic, push this key to crawl push this key to walk, piss off.

Ok the ending was subpar...every single part of the BC2 campaign svcked ass besides the end.
Actually boss battles are cliched

Epic Win when it comes to single player mode.

Epic Fail when it comes to textures.

Just another video game when it comes to multiplayer (though it has a sense of uniqueness to it).

And if there was the option for simple "win" then I would pick that for the graphics since they are up to par, with some improved aspects (like water), to Crysis 1 and Warhead. It's just the damn textures.