» Fri Dec 31, 2010 10:53 am
To be honest, I think the answer is yes for Crysis 2, but no for Crysis 1 and Warhead. BUT that processor already has both feet in the grave, therefore it's not a good investment.
I mean it dude, get the i5 2500k. That will last a very long time AND it will have a high resale value when the next processor comes.
Why would you say no for Warhead and Crysis 1 but yes for Crysis 2? surely crysis 2 will be more demanding than either that or warhead.
And ive read up on reviews of the system build I was looking at with this processor and people have said it runs warhead on enthusiast settings! but I could understand it is slightly outdated.
Vanilla Crysis and Crysis Warhead are more demanding than Crysis 2. Crysis 2 is being made for consoles. The graphics WILL be dumbed down. AND EVEN IF THEY AREN'T. The maps in Crysis 2 will have less to render (this is why they moved it from the jungle to the city).
The i3 was out dated when it came out. The i3 is for your grandma's computer. I'm not even kidding. Link me to those reviews you're talking about.
AGAIN, THE GRAPHICS ARE DUMBED DOWN, AND THE MAPS HAVE BEEN DESIGNED TO HAVE LESS CRAP TO RENDER. I'LL BET YOU THAT MOST OF THE "OPTIMIZATION" OF THE CRYENGINE3 IS BECAUSE OF THIS.
http://www.overclockers.co.uk/showproduct.php?prodid=FS-237-OK&tool=3
Scroll down to the reviews tab.