Crysis 2 Graphics vs. BF3

Post » Fri Jun 03, 2011 12:56 am

Obviously this is going to be primarily from a speculative point of view considering both games have yet to be released and there is limited footage of BF3. However a few friends and I were in a debate of which game would have better graphics. I support Crysis 2! Crysis' reputation for steller graphics has been top of the line and I can't see BF3 beating it. What is your say?
User avatar
cassy
 
Posts: 3368
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 12:57 am

Post » Thu Jun 02, 2011 6:29 pm

I'd put my money on crysis 2 at this stage.

However, if bf3 does beat crysis 2, you won't hear me complaining.
User avatar
Chloé
 
Posts: 3351
Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2007 8:15 am

Post » Fri Jun 03, 2011 2:04 am

Crysis 2 beats BF3 at the console department. While Battlefield 3 could beat Crysis 2 at the PC department :D

What i most fear is BF3 not end up as Crysis at it's time. Which lagged even on 8800GTX back then. If that happens then it's a no buy for me for the moment. I wont upgrade for a single game.
User avatar
Louise Lowe
 
Posts: 3262
Joined: Fri Jul 28, 2006 9:08 am

Post » Fri Jun 03, 2011 6:29 am

As of right now no console footage of BF3 has been shown, that was blatently PC footage in the trailer and it would be silly to compare the two as crysis 2 hasnt been maxed yet and BF3 is nowere near release.
User avatar
ZzZz
 
Posts: 3396
Joined: Sat Jul 08, 2006 9:56 pm

Post » Thu Jun 02, 2011 10:54 pm

My money is on Crysis, but BF3 won′t be far behind.
At least that what i would expect:P
User avatar
maya papps
 
Posts: 3468
Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 3:44 pm

Post » Thu Jun 02, 2011 7:27 pm

from the HQ screenshots of BF3... game looks much better than i had originally anticipated.

looks like for the PC, bf3 will definitely give crysis 2 a run. since i havent seen any pc footage besides the leaked version, its hard to judge. but leaked version vs bf3, id go with bf3.

http://planetbattlefield.gamespy.com/screenshots/?category_select_id=subcat_54&game=15

finally, a game developed FOR the PC. Its been a while! look what we end up getting when they focus on the PC version... An awesome looking game, with all the features we would expect (minus mod tools).

BF3 has a 'pc first' mentality, and will win game of the year because of that. mark my words.
User avatar
Ludivine Poussineau
 
Posts: 3353
Joined: Fri Mar 30, 2007 2:49 pm

Post » Fri Jun 03, 2011 3:57 am

For Battlefield 3. It looks really good @ first sight but: we havent seen any closeups yet so we cant really judge about the texture quality and particle effects yet. Its like comparing some U3 Engine games to Crysis... The devil is in the details folks! Just go near some wall or fence and you will see the striking differences. But frostbite 2.0 will have the better physical destruction for sure.
But what really grinds my gears is that they claim that we will need Dx11 and a 64 Bit OS to max Battlefield 3 out..
the whole Dx10 generation cards ( especially the 200er series) would have no problem with BF3 performance wise.. but if they built it on dx11 exclusively.. they would bar out many potential customers.
User avatar
stephanie eastwood
 
Posts: 3526
Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2006 1:25 pm

Post » Thu Jun 02, 2011 2:32 pm

Id bet money on Crysis 2 beating BF3. Crysis have allways been the king of graphics. BF:BC2 had ok graphics, nothing fancy;)
User avatar
john palmer
 
Posts: 3410
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 8:07 pm

Post » Thu Jun 02, 2011 8:21 pm

BF:BC2 had extremely weak textures even in high.. and thats what kinda ruined it for me as one of my personal favorites for 2010.
But i think its very difficult to have this kind of interactivity and destruction with objects and builidngs in a game and also use extreme high res textures at the same time.
User avatar
Charlotte X
 
Posts: 3318
Joined: Thu Dec 07, 2006 2:53 am

Post » Fri Jun 03, 2011 4:14 am

I'm pretty certain that BF3 will have better graphics on PC than Crysis 2. I mean the fact they already moved on from DX9 to fully develope the game to DX11 and to DX10 while Crysis 2 is still more focused on the DX9. Also I think that I read somewhere that BF3 will be more system demanding than Crysis 2. But really, the both will have the top graphics, there's no doubt about that. I'd say that C2 will have better gfx on consoles compared to BF3 while BF3 will have better gfx on PC compared to Crysis 2.
User avatar
Esther Fernandez
 
Posts: 3415
Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2006 11:52 am

Post » Fri Jun 03, 2011 5:18 am

But what really grinds my gears is that they claim that we will need Dx11 and a 64 Bit OS to max Battlefield 3 out..
the whole Dx10 generation cards ( especially the 200er series) would have no problem with BF3 performance wise.. but if they built it on dx11 exclusively.. they would bar out many potential customers.

Actually it runs on both DX10 and 11, but not DX9.
Wich means it runs on Vista and 7, but not XP
User avatar
Chavala
 
Posts: 3355
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 5:28 am

Post » Thu Jun 02, 2011 11:03 pm

From what i've seen of the trailers, BF3 seems to be a bit better than BFBC2, about graphics, but I think it will be the same unrealistic destruction with Frostbite 2.0 but I think it ,in max settings, will not beat Crysis 2 in max settings.
User avatar
Gracie Dugdale
 
Posts: 3397
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 11:02 pm

Post » Thu Jun 02, 2011 5:17 pm

So the era of crytek being the graphics and gameplay leader on pc ends in 2011? well all i have to say RIP consoled dumbed graphics you wont be missed.
User avatar
Steve Bates
 
Posts: 3447
Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2007 2:51 pm

Post » Fri Jun 03, 2011 4:10 am

Comparing the graphics of two unreleased games. Why can't people wait until they actually see both games before comparing their graphics? Or gameplay, for that matter?
User avatar
Roddy
 
Posts: 3564
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2007 11:50 pm

Post » Fri Jun 03, 2011 6:09 am

BF3 will be overall a better experience on PC. THe sound in MOH was amazing, crysis 2 sounds like bb gun fight
User avatar
Sammi Jones
 
Posts: 3407
Joined: Thu Nov 23, 2006 7:59 am

Post » Thu Jun 02, 2011 10:43 pm

People should not make threads like this if they have zero hands on and zero gameplay footage about the stuff. Trailers nowadays are still rendered clips to impress the crowd. Cryengine3 does not need it of course;)
User avatar
Rachyroo
 
Posts: 3415
Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2006 11:23 pm

Post » Fri Jun 03, 2011 6:22 am

zero gameplay footage about the stuff.

whose fault is that
User avatar
Mandy Muir
 
Posts: 3307
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 4:38 pm

Post » Thu Jun 02, 2011 7:14 pm

zero gameplay footage about the stuff.

whose fault is that

1 more day dude
User avatar
MR.BIGG
 
Posts: 3373
Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2007 7:51 am

Post » Fri Jun 03, 2011 6:28 am

Does a comparison not imply having both of them,lol?
User avatar
Jonathan Windmon
 
Posts: 3410
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 12:23 pm


Return to Crysis