Okay folks its Wars vs Crysis 2 multiplayer... Im sorry but i had to use Microsoft paint and so the rezising wasnt as good as it used to be But i hope you guys can find some differences.
I just shot these pics spontaneous out of the game so i didnt forced anything to look good or bad.

Brick walls:





Water:





Surfaces (general)





Lighting:






The used Settings:

Crysis Wars:
Everything maxed out @ 1680*1050

Crysis 2 MP: 1680*1050; hardcoe mode

This forum can't do large images. If you could do a comparison with the images one to top of the other or link to another site.

Argh ... damn... i **** up something... i rather give you my photbucket folder...

http://s1080.photobucket.com/albums/j327/bigboulder/

Whoops.. as you can see 1680*1050 was my setting for Wars and not for Crysis 2.

Yeah I thought the texture res when you get close on Skyline mostly looked fine. I think there is a problem on Pier 17 though with low res textures in places or high res textures that were sampled at a low res.

Crysis 2 is beautiful. Crysis is also beautiful, but always felt a bit rough. Like it was trying too hard to imitate reality, and failing because of that.

I think the demo looks great, but we all know CE3 is more capable than what we've seen. So hopefully the mp isnt dumbed down, or we'll just have to modify it like we did with C1

C2 looks better.

@ tsc0308

Thats a hard thing to say... one is just as good as the other i would say.
Some textures are clearly better on wars not to mention the water effects.
But the lighting and the overall look feels a bit more right on Crysis 2.
I thing its a draw... especially when you consider that Crysis wars is a game from 2008 compared to a AAA title from 2011