This is a Crysis 2 forums the last time I recall........not some place to whine about a 4 year old game and how palm trees look superior to brick and mortar buildings. And you summed it up, you are ticked at lack of tweaking options and **** vehicles as you call them, I didn't know this was a racing game and vehicles were priority. Also My GTX 580 has no problem running Crysis or Crysis Warhead at Very High DX10 or Enthusiast with 16x Antistrophic Filtering and 8x Super Sampling Anti Aliasing. I get a constant 40-75Fps. The problem seems that people are ticked more at change of locale than the actual textures being bad, even though they want to blame it on textures. Compare urban areas of Crysis and Crysis Warhead to Crysis 2 and then tell me that Crysis 2 in inferior.
Oh and a Crysis hater...its one of my favorite games actually and the first PC game I ever bought 2 years ago when I decided to build a gaming computer. But change in venue does not mean that Crysis 2 looks bad...I do prefer the palm trees and jungle but in no way is Crysis 2 inferior to Crysis. Crysis 2 has less objects rendered on the screen at any one time to Crysis due to its setting, that does not mean that each object has lower quality than the first game.