Croweded with disapointments

Post » Thu Jun 02, 2011 11:24 pm

I was browsing through the pages that show's all the latest threads, and wow, everyone is just trashing Crytek. If I were to paste the links of all the negative threads, it would be some big list. Either Crytek really screwed the PC community or everyone are whiners (I'm leaning more towards the former).
User avatar
Amy Siebenhaar
 
Posts: 3426
Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2007 1:51 am

Post » Fri Jun 03, 2011 11:27 am

This is what happens whenever a high profile, once PC exclusive franchise gets consolized.

Crytek didn't deliver on their promises. I can only hope to god DX11 makes a world of a difference...
User avatar
Cameron Wood
 
Posts: 3384
Joined: Wed Oct 31, 2007 3:01 pm

Post » Fri Jun 03, 2011 1:58 am

I really don't understand how people could be upset with how the game looks on the PC, its mind-blowing.
User avatar
Brian LeHury
 
Posts: 3416
Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 6:54 am

Post » Fri Jun 03, 2011 1:41 am

why whine just because its not dx11? the game itself with dx11 looks even better than the first one
User avatar
saxon
 
Posts: 3376
Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2007 2:45 am

Post » Thu Jun 02, 2011 11:42 pm

PC gamers are angry because of the specs of the technology (no DX11, three graphics settings, etc.)

Everyone's forgetting to look around and see how amazing it looks.
User avatar
Rachie Stout
 
Posts: 3480
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 2:19 pm

Post » Fri Jun 03, 2011 10:02 am

Three graphics settings and the lowest is High. Seriously, what game has High as the lowest setting? 0__o
User avatar
meghan lock
 
Posts: 3451
Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2007 10:26 pm

Post » Fri Jun 03, 2011 5:07 am

Dont be stupid. It looks ok, but the first game looked better. And all they did with the lighting in c2 is add insane amounts of bloom which looks like **** as far as realism.

People who play on consoles cant even comprehend what DX11 means right now. Dont try, you will just look stupid.

To reiterate, c2 is not mindblowing on the PC. For consoles yea, looks great. Blows no minds on the PC though...
User avatar
Teghan Harris
 
Posts: 3370
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 1:31 pm

Post » Thu Jun 02, 2011 10:59 pm

PC gamers are angry because of the specs of the technology (no DX11, three graphics settings, etc.)

Everyone's forgetting to look around and see how amazing it looks.

And thats where you fail. Its looks like a consolized POS compared to the beauty of Crysis 1.
User avatar
Joey Bel
 
Posts: 3487
Joined: Sun Jan 07, 2007 9:44 am

Post » Thu Jun 02, 2011 9:22 pm

Crysis 2 has better graphic than Crysis 1? LMAO!!!

Go and watch this YouTube for comparison: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kRWRskYLdno
User avatar
Ian White
 
Posts: 3476
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 8:08 pm

Post » Thu Jun 02, 2011 9:41 pm

PC gamers are angry because Crytek has put such a focus on the console versions of the games that they've underdelivered on key aspects of the PC version, for instance:

Terrible matchmaking system. GameSpy, really?
Lack of DirectX 11 support (Only important because Crysis is supposed to be the cutting edge technology behind graphics, and yet we're only able to use DirectX10?
No sandbox or publicly released dedicated server software, which means absolutely no modding.
No advanced graphical controls.
Tons of blur and bloom to hide the fact that the graphics have been greatly toned down to accommodate console hardware.
User avatar
herrade
 
Posts: 3469
Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2007 1:09 pm


Return to Crysis