either that or this guy is retarded LOL!This is really the dumbest post i've ever seen. You can't sue someone for making a game because they don't ow you money. If you don't like Crysis 2 then don't buy it. I hear lots of dumbasses like you buying Nvidia GTX580 everytime a game comes out. Seriously I have a good enough computer to play Crysis 2 with Geforce9800 (thats all I really need) so there is no reason for me to upgrade. Waste of money on your part. But do what you want. you are entitled to your opinions and the free choice to make such stupid decisions. Don't blame Crytek for your problems.

When i was playing the multiplayer, some guy, that said that he were an lawyer, said to me that was possible to sue crytek.

I personally purchased an Nvidia GTX580 card and upgraded my PC for Crysis 2.

€ryTek promised me that Crysis 2's graphics would be much better than those of Crysis 1. They also said that Crysis 2 was developed with a PC focus and that it would utilise DX11.

But these were all lies! Since I founded my purchase of a $600 graphics card on promises which were not kept, I feel that I am due compensation.

Is anyone else in the same boat as me?

Since €ryTek only cares about profits now, let's hit them where it will hurt them. Let's get the ball rolling to start a class action for compensation against CryTek!
Lol, typical American. xD
Crysis 2 looks better than Crysis. You must be blind if you dont see it. Global illumination, improved SSAO [...] No other game have real time global illumination (BFBC3 will) and thanks to this Crysis 2 on DX9 beats any other game on any DX or whatever. Also it will have DX11, but just not yet. I bet that you can't even recognize the difference between DX9 and DX11, but thats another story. Tesselation is the only visible improvement since DX9. Everybody cares about profits, its the reason why they are making the game in the first place. Although PC DLC for money would be too much, I would be pissed then.

There must have been a Law & Order marathon everyone on these **** forums is wanting to sue for some dumbass reason. You bought a badass graphics card? Awesome you won't have to buy one for awhile now so shut the **** up because within a years time im sure some game will come out that will make you glad you have it. If your saying you bought this card JUST for this game that means you spent relatively $700 on ONE game...

LMFAO so much anger

Lol at this thread. I don't know about the US, but in the UK reliance loss has to be reasonable. It probably wouldn't be found reasonable for you to have spent $600 in reliance on a game which costs less than $60.

Although don't get me wrong, I do love it when PC elitists come unstuck.

lol
what a moron.

i'm gonna sue! WAHH WAHH!

what a crying little bich

removed quote to limit postlenght

A large number of technologies used in this game. It still doesn't make this one the A+ grade game I've seen in Crysis 1. Good. things that make a PC title (we're in the pc forums...) going from an A grade to an A+ grade are:

- Destructible environment. I could blow up everything in Crysis 1. Now I can't.
- Leaves that actually move when your character moves through them.
- Animations. Those things really set the A+ apart from an A game. Animations for picking up weapons, animations for entering vehicles etc. The more the merrier. This will also greatly benefit the replayablility of this game.
- multiple angles of approach, e.g. open ground. Although in a city, this is still basically a corridor shooter with open air instead of a roof. Sure you can go 50m right or 50m left and sneak past stuff, but you cannot go a block around.
- Large stuff, large map, more players (16 :'(), more versatility. (e.g. more replayability in the long run)
- Decent physx. Use the environment, use the objects, throw stuff, lift stuff, build stuff to get up on that roof. All those nice things that make you want to think out of the box. Wouldn't it be great if the user who plays the game, finds out ways to hit objectives in ways the creators didn't think of, nor put in the game? (see deus ex for inspiration)
- Decent options screen. 3 settings... seriously? (and I know you got commands n stuff, but I would like to see these settings in the options screen as well)
- Improved graphics. I've got a mid-end card (5850) on a Q9550 @ stock and I play this game on a 2.5 MP resolution with everything at the highest detail level. That's wrong!. What reason is there to get a better graphics card. Appearently midrange is enough for maximum settings. There's so much more potential.
- AI. Yeah, that needs some work too. Even the most difficult settings isn't really challenging anymore. Mario 1 was challenging, and since then every other game is too easy.
- Do something different then the usual COD-ness. We've seen that, and the great cod lineup ended with COD2. Sure, most won't agree, and I don't care .

I wouldnt go as far as suing, but they will never get any of my money again.
I'm EXTREMELY disappointed with this game.
Like the original poster, i didnt read the box to see if its dx9... who the **** releases a dx9 game these days? ESPECIALLY since it follows the reputation of an epic title like Crysis, which was the one single game that was known for pushing PC performance to the limit.

I expected to see amazing graphics, I expected to see my computer sweat and beg for mercy.... did not happen. Disappointed...

ON TOP OF IT ALL
I CANT EVEN **** LOG IN TO PLAY THE DAMN GAME ONLINE AT LAUNCH OF THE GAME!
What the HELL was the point of pre ordering this thing again??

It's not just about the money, it's the principle.

Well GL wasting weeks of your life and hundreds of dollars for "principle".

I'm sure Crytek will lose a lot of sleep (none) and tons of money (probably 60 bucks IF you win) if you sue them.

You probably won't win BTW. These kinda cases rarely do. You just think they do cus when the big company does lose, the media is usually all over it.

You probably won't win BTW. These kinda cases rarely do. You just think they do cus when the big company does lose, the media is usually all over it.


ROFL! tune into Fox News at 8, Judge tells disgruntled gamer to stop wasting his time.

Buying a $500 GPU for one game mean you're an overpaid idiot. Any judge who didn't get his career in a cracker-jack sweepstakes would know this.

ROFL! tune into Fox News at 8, Judge tells disgruntled gamer to stop wasting his time.
ROTFL

A large number of technologies used in this game. It still doesn't make this one the A+ grade game I've seen in Crysis 1. Good. things that make a PC title (we're in the pc forums...) going from an A grade to an A+ grade are:

- Destructible environment. I could blow up everything in Crysis 1. Now I can't.
- Leaves that actually move when your character moves through them.
- Animations. Those things really set the A+ apart from an A game. Animations for picking up weapons, animations for entering vehicles etc. The more the merrier. This will also greatly benefit the replayablility of this game.
- multiple angles of approach, e.g. open ground. Although in a city, this is still basically a corridor shooter with open air instead of a roof. Sure you can go 50m right or 50m left and sneak past stuff, but you cannot go a block around.
- Large stuff, large map, more players (16 :'(), more versatility. (e.g. more replayability in the long run)
- Decent physx. Use the environment, use the objects, throw stuff, lift stuff, build stuff to get up on that roof. All those nice things that make you want to think out of the box. Wouldn't it be great if the user who plays the game, finds out ways to hit objectives in ways the creators didn't think of, nor put in the game? (see deus ex for inspiration)
- Decent options screen. 3 settings... seriously? (and I know you got commands n stuff, but I would like to see these settings in the options screen as well)
- Improved graphics. I've got a mid-end card (5850) on a Q9550 @ stock and I play this game on a 2.5 MP resolution with everything at the highest detail level. That's wrong!. What reason is there to get a better graphics card. Appearently midrange is enough for maximum settings. There's so much more potential.
- AI. Yeah, that needs some work too. Even the most difficult settings isn't really challenging anymore. Mario 1 was challenging, and since then every other game is too easy.
- Do something different then the usual COD-ness. We've seen that, and the great cod lineup ended with COD2. Sure, most won't agree, and I don't care .
QFT!

I guess some of console guys posting up in this topic don't get it... but well, not everyone has a capable gaming platform. What's AAA+++ for you is barely B for others

See if you can take the card back (Nvidia did mislead customers in it's advertising material) and then let Nvidia sort it out with Crytek.

I personally purchased an Nvidia GTX580 card and upgraded my PC for Crysis 2.

€ryTek promised me that Crysis 2's graphics would be much better than those of Crysis 1. They also said that Crysis 2 was developed with a PC focus and that it would utilise DX11.

But these were all lies! Since I founded my purchase of a $600 graphics card on promises which were not kept, I feel that I am due compensation.

Is anyone else in the same boat as me?

Since €ryTek only cares about profits now, let's hit them where it will hurt them. Let's get the ball rolling to start a class action for compensation against CryTek!
No. Not once did they promise the graphics would be better than the original. They said they were aiming to make it look better than the original and i don't recall any promises being made. DX11 will not make that much of a difference to the look of the game and being PC focus? Come on, its multiplat, of course this was going to happen.

You chose to spend $600 on a GTX580 and you should be happy knowing you'll be able to play a huge amount of games maxed out for years to come. Me? Im happy with my GTX560 thankyou..

ROFL! tune into Fox News at 8, Judge tells disgruntled gamer to stop wasting his time.
ROTFL

A large number of technologies used in this game. It still doesn't make this one the A+ grade game I've seen in Crysis 1. Good. things that make a PC title (we're in the pc forums...) going from an A grade to an A+ grade are:

- Destructible environment. I could blow up everything in Crysis 1. Now I can't.
- Leaves that actually move when your character moves through them.
- Animations. Those things really set the A+ apart from an A game. Animations for picking up weapons, animations for entering vehicles etc. The more the merrier. This will also greatly benefit the replayablility of this game.
- multiple angles of approach, e.g. open ground. Although in a city, this is still basically a corridor shooter with open air instead of a roof. Sure you can go 50m right or 50m left and sneak past stuff, but you cannot go a block around.
- Large stuff, large map, more players (16 :'(), more versatility. (e.g. more replayability in the long run)
- Decent physx. Use the environment, use the objects, throw stuff, lift stuff, build stuff to get up on that roof. All those nice things that make you want to think out of the box. Wouldn't it be great if the user who plays the game, finds out ways to hit objectives in ways the creators didn't think of, nor put in the game? (see deus ex for inspiration)
- Decent options screen. 3 settings... seriously? (and I know you got commands n stuff, but I would like to see these settings in the options screen as well)
- Improved graphics. I've got a mid-end card (5850) on a Q9550 @ stock and I play this game on a 2.5 MP resolution with everything at the highest detail level. That's wrong!. What reason is there to get a better graphics card. Appearently midrange is enough for maximum settings. There's so much more potential.
- AI. Yeah, that needs some work too. Even the most difficult settings isn't really challenging anymore. Mario 1 was challenging, and since then every other game is too easy.
- Do something different then the usual COD-ness. We've seen that, and the great cod lineup ended with COD2. Sure, most won't agree, and I don't care .
QFT!

I guess some of console guys posting up in this topic don't get it... but well, not everyone has a capable gaming platform. What's AAA+++ for you is barely B for others

Hey it's taken 4 pages for someone to actually post something reasonable! You shouldn't be congratulating him, you should ashamed of yourselves lol.

I can understand M2M complaints, I'm surprised to hear that they've scaled down the destructible environments and environmental interations, that was one of the things that really amazed by Crysis 1 the attention to detail.

According to IGN it is 16 player, if it's not then that's bad.

I disagree about having more options, it is far better to optimize the user experience by simplify things as much as possible.

CoD was the worst thing to happen to gaming...

Hey it's taken 4 pages for someone to actually post something reasonable! You shouldn't be congratulating him, you should ashamed of yourselves lol.

I can understand M2M complaints, I'm surprised to hear that they've scaled down the destructible environments and environmental interations, that was one of the things that really amazed by Crysis 1 the attention to detail.

According to IGN it is 16 player, if it's not then that's bad.

I disagree about having more options, it is far better to optimize the user experience by simplify things as much as possible.

CoD was the worst thing to happen to gaming...

Don't get me wrong. I don't like COD, but loads of ppl do enjoy the game(s). Part hype, and part absence of a decent alternative in my honest opinion, but I can't judge that.
However, I too miss the attention to detail in this game. Crysis 1 set boundaries. It elevated next gen gaming. I was thunderstruck and jawdropping when I witnessed the sparkling graphics dripping off my screen. At friggin medium settings no less. I enjoyed the game a second and third time when I was in the possession of decent hardware and could crank it up to high. It had freedom like in farcry, it had beautiful jungle settings and they went all-out on the aliens. One big hugeass amazing experience. But alas, I just don't feel the same way with this game. Sure, it has doubled the amount of polygons and higher res texturework. But it doesn't feel jawdropping.

With regard to the settings, they could have added a customization button. 3 settings for ppl not interested in settings (make sure you call 'm decently! low-end, mid-end and a high-end settings, instead of hardcoe and extreme. These words don't make sense.).

One more thing I miss, is something I've seen in the FEAR game. If you shoot a wall in FEAR, a hole appears. Including dust n smoke. Those kind of details add tremendously to the overwhelming nature of a game. Getting closer to an action movie with bulletholes instead of bullets disappearing into walls, or just another texture layer on top of the wall texture.

Allright, last thing. In the original farcry game, if I threw a grenade on the ground (and the grenade exploded), a hole appeared. Uhm... where's my hole?

You seriously have to be one of the dumbest people on earth, well done sir!

do you guys notice how this retard just stops replying to this thread after everyone tells him how dumb he is? lol treated. Play the goddamn game, its **** amazing and it looks way crazier that crysis 1

Ya know the game looks good and its fun to play, I feel as though i have been lied to though. All the stuff Crytek promised was for the Xbox. that's fine they should have just said that. I'm just disappointed that this is not the old Crytek That I always bragged to people about how great they where at building PC games. **** anyone can build a game for xbox thats for 1st grade and below heck my son is 7 been on a pc since he is one I he played on a Xbox controller and said this is easy daddy but boring!

you can sue on the grounds of false advertising

Wow youre gonna sue Crytek becouse you wasted 600 bucks on a gaming card that seems pretty hilarious and a waste of time budy ;D

every single game that has multiplayer, released over the past few years has threats to sue posted on the forums. Read EULA and info in the game booklet. as bungie puts it: "You have no rights, play nice.":)

you can sue on the grounds of false advertising

Doubt it, as I said before, reliance generally needs to be reasonable and proportionate.
It may be different in his jurisdiction, but it would be retarded if that were the case. Also, I'm pretty sure in the US there are rules protecting companies from crushing lawsuits (mentioned in the McDonald's cases I'm currently studying).

Bottom line, you won't succeed.

This thread is being locked given the amount of flaming in it, and the lack of forseeable constructive value.