» Thu Dec 31, 2009 1:16 am AMD 955 3.6 GHZ
AMD 6970 2GB Graphics card
4gb Ram DDR3 1600
1920X1200
You can keep yourselves telling that but really how is it optimized when this game runs 56 fps avg on my system and crysis 1 runs 40 fps average on my system. Crysis 2 dips as low as 40 and crysis 1 as low as 25.
Dumb pc owner:Well you know thats a whooping 16fps increase so what are you talking about?
What am i talking about?!! The game sacrificed many features to get to that level.
-Low texture resolution. Graphics card load is reduced
-Open enviroments. Memory would take a small impact
-Physics almost non existant on comparison to crysis 1 where you could blow up buildings and tear down trees, the enviroment would be in constant change as confrontation would take place. Now the enviroment is stagnant and the the only thing you can break is your head against the wall for being a fanboy. Cpu and graphics card load reduced
-Im running dx10 whereas dx9 would offer me a 5 fps boost closing the gap making it only a 11fps advantage yet sacrificing all these features.
Whats your point im too dumb to realize
My point is that if crysis 2 employed all those features back we would realize the console port that this game truly is.
Because you cant fit open enviroments, high resolution textures, physics and dx10 without having a perfomance impact and i belive that impact would cost much greater than 11 frames per second in their beloved cryengine 3
Stick that in your pipe and smoke it crytek fanboys.
