» Mon Jun 13, 2011 10:03 am
It's very rare to see them post a review of a game that doesn't have shooter elements and give them higher then 8.5, Or, Games with shooter elements that don't stack up to COD or Halo.
Dragon Age 2: 8.5
Red Faction: Armageddon: 7.0
Gran Torismo 5: 8.5
Dead Rising 2: 8.0
AC: Brotherhood: 8.0
Brink: 6.0
My opinions: Dragon age is good at 8.5, Red Faction deserves 8.5, Gran Torismo 5 deserves 9.5, Dead Rising 8.5, AC Brotherhood 9.0 and Brink 8.0.
Looking at the video review for brink their main reasons for the rating was texture popping and other stuff, When the Devs announced a patch on RELEASE DAY that they were fixing it. IGN based their review on pre-release bugs, Not to mention they were playing a heavily multi-player based game in single player with bots and said it wasn't as good as advertised. It was advertised for exciting Co-Op and mission versus. Also he mentions something about COD but I can't remember what off the top of my head.
Those are the kind of people that work for IGN. Idiots.