Do you think that the Enclave is good?

Post » Wed Aug 26, 2009 2:12 am

Well I'm American and I DON'T support the Enclave, because they really don't care about "Americans". All they care about is their own Enclave members, and the many Wastelanders who ARE still Americans, they want to kill off. I'm so glad the Enclave doesn't exist.
User avatar
Steven Hardman
 
Posts: 3323
Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2007 5:12 pm

Post » Tue Aug 25, 2009 11:38 pm

They're trying to rebuild America, thats good enough for me.
User avatar
Joe Bonney
 
Posts: 3466
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 12:00 pm

Post » Tue Aug 25, 2009 8:08 pm

But tell me, is Fallout 3's America even worth rebuilding?
User avatar
Avril Louise
 
Posts: 3408
Joined: Thu Jun 15, 2006 10:37 pm

Post » Wed Aug 26, 2009 1:34 am

I am a full Enclave Fan :) They are the U.S. and I am American and 100% support them. Just like I do our troops in Iraq.


Again, I mean you no offense, but I think you do not understand what it is that the U.S. was founded on. It was founded on the belief that all are equal. You would kill another human simply because they have a mutation just as you do? The only difference between your mutations and theirs is that theirs were caused by exposure to radioactive material. Then again, you could have the same mutations. Radiation is everywhere. The countertops in your kitchen give off radiation and so does the sun. Cancer is a radiation-induced mutation. I think America's founding fathers are rolling in their graves right now. The Enclave have strayed too far from America's values and I do not believe you understand genetics.
User avatar
Michelle Smith
 
Posts: 3417
Joined: Wed Nov 15, 2006 2:03 am

Post » Wed Aug 26, 2009 12:52 am

So, do you all support the Holocaust?
User avatar
Chavala
 
Posts: 3355
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 5:28 am

Post » Wed Aug 26, 2009 3:54 am

But tell me, is Fallout 3's America even worth rebuilding?


Now, that's a good point.
User avatar
Eilidh Brian
 
Posts: 3504
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 10:45 am

Post » Wed Aug 26, 2009 12:14 pm

The Enclave has death squad patrols in the wasteland. They round up undesirables, and execute them.

They're ghouls

They lure people into lorries (trucks to you yanks) with the promise of clean, potable water, and then burn them to a crisp with a flamethrower.

Again, ghouls

Their chief executive officer, a man that receives his share of hero worship on these boards, murders an innocent woman to get her colleague to cooperate. If the main character tells him what he wants to know during an interrogation, he murders him or her in cold blood.


I don;t like Autumn, really. He's too hot headed for everyone's sake. Borderlining psychotic. :shrug:

If Vault 101 is uninhabitable, Amata can get caught by the Enclave, where she too will be murdered after ended interrogation.


That didn't make sense, since vault dwellers should, even if they were really evil, be used for their pure gens. Also, since they were really acting in their own accord, so we can rule them as rotten apples.

There are Enclave encampments with Deathclaw cages, but rather than Deathclaws there are dead Wastelanders in them.
There is an Enclave checkpoint, where there is a computer, where you can see the names of members of the "vagrant population," (Raiders and ordinary wastelanders) who have been detained there and executed.


We can't really know if they were innocent, can we? As far as we know, they could have had resisted arrest or something like that.

There is a temporary Enclave base set up in one of the sattelite towers, where the ovens are in full service. On the floor below the ovens lie the remains of several wastelanders, ready to be processed.

I clearly remember that one, and they were all ghouls.

And even if they didn't do that, The Enclave represents a government that has been defunct for 200 years. They have no legal claim to govern America. The United States of America does not exist any longer in the Fallout world, and people have set up their own small political entities. The people of the American mainland no longer have any obligation to a government that disappeared eight generations before they were even born.

All governments have to start (in this case, re-start) from some point, haven't they? It's a sad fact, but force is usually the way to get and hold power. I assure you any current government in the world exists now because they've used force to get and hold power at some point.
User avatar
Cccurly
 
Posts: 3381
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 8:18 pm

Post » Wed Aug 26, 2009 2:27 am

To me I find this topic quite intriguing .


I'll state my tart



The Enclave is a morally grey group of Elitist humans who have only the desire to rebuild America the way it was before the Great War


Their means are through genocide, for which it is to bring safety the future generations ALL around the world.


I myself am a Socialist, but I support the Enclave. WHY?

1. I don't support them because they are bad-ass. I support them because they have a realistic goal

2. Their means will benefit the future world. No more gangers/raiders/thief-like wastelanders/murderers/cannibals and so on would be eradicated.

3. Ghouls and Mutants have no rights. They are abominations unto themselves and should perish


And thus, I conclude genocide is a meritable use in the scenario the Enclave is stuck in.
User avatar
Ludivine Dupuy
 
Posts: 3418
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 6:51 pm

Post » Wed Aug 26, 2009 9:25 am

Well I'm American and I DON'T support the Enclave, because they really don't care about "Americans". All they care about is their own Enclave members, and the many Wastelanders who ARE still Americans, they want to kill off. I'm so glad the Enclave doesn't exist.


This on so many levels, if the Enclave where just not as friggin insane as they are maybe then I'd label them as good. They sadly kill everything thats not them, but besides I love selling their armour for the caps!
User avatar
Susan Elizabeth
 
Posts: 3420
Joined: Sat Oct 21, 2006 4:35 pm

Post » Wed Aug 26, 2009 9:43 am

Their means are through genocide, for which it is to bring safety the future generations ALL around the world.

...

3. Ghouls and Mutants have no rights. They are abominations unto themselves and should perish


This is so wrong on so many levels I can't even begin to list them.
User avatar
Darren
 
Posts: 3354
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2007 2:33 pm

Post » Wed Aug 26, 2009 4:54 am

To me I find this topic quite intriguing .


I'll state my tart



The Enclave is a morally grey group of Elitist humans who have only the desire to rebuild America the way it was before the Great War


Their means are through genocide, for which it is to bring safety the future generations ALL around the world.


I myself am a Socialist, but I support the Enclave. WHY?

1. I don't support them because they are bad-ass. I support them because they have a realistic goal

2. Their means will benefit the future world. No more gangers/raiders/thief-like wastelanders/murderers/cannibals and so on would be eradicated.

3. Ghouls and Mutants have no rights. They are abominations unto themselves and should perish


And thus, I conclude genocide is a meritable use in the scenario the Enclave is stuck in.



the gouls are abominations? so they must die? hitler much, they're differnt from you so they must die?
User avatar
Timara White
 
Posts: 3464
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2007 7:39 am

Post » Wed Aug 26, 2009 4:53 am

the gouls are abominations? so they must die? hitler much, they're differnt from you so they must die?


We keep saying this, but they never listen.

I'd love to get a demographic of how old people are in this thread related to what their viewpoint on this is. I'm willing to bet a thousand caps on the genocide-endorsers mostly being in their teens.
User avatar
Blessed DIVA
 
Posts: 3408
Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 12:09 am

Post » Wed Aug 26, 2009 11:12 am

hitlor believed that germany and germans were the greatest people alive and the rest didnt diserve to live. the enclave is the same thing, they believe that the members of the enclave are better than those of the wastland and they have no right to live.

as for the ghouls, who are you to dicide who or what is an abomination? killing these ghouls is the equivalant(of this time periode) of going into hospitals and killing people who have cancer, those people that are two people but in one body(wow that sounded terrible), and all the athoer "abominations".
User avatar
Queen of Spades
 
Posts: 3383
Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 12:06 pm

Post » Wed Aug 26, 2009 12:26 am

Keep talking about the Nazis and this thread will be locked. Plus Goldwin's Law.
User avatar
Lloyd Muldowney
 
Posts: 3497
Joined: Wed May 23, 2007 2:08 pm

Post » Wed Aug 26, 2009 7:28 am

Keep talking about the Nazis and this thread will be locked. Plus Goldwin's Law.

there is nothing wrong with comparing ones beliefs to someone elses in history, no matter who it is. I just looked up goldwins law and i dont think it makes any sense.
User avatar
Veronica Flores
 
Posts: 3308
Joined: Mon Sep 11, 2006 5:26 pm

Post » Wed Aug 26, 2009 8:52 am

as for the ghouls, who are you to dicide who or what is an abomination? killing these ghouls is the equivalant(of this time periode) of going into hospitals and killing people who have cancer, those people that are two people but in one body(wow that sounded terrible), and all the athoer "abominations".

I don't recall that people with cancer or that are two in one body (whatever that was supposed to mean -- I guess siamese twins) eventually turn into mindless, aggressive and biologically immortal cannibals. If they did, then going into hospitals and disposing of them wouldn't be such a bad idea after all.
User avatar
Nicole M
 
Posts: 3501
Joined: Thu Jun 15, 2006 6:31 am

Post » Wed Aug 26, 2009 6:13 am

They're ghouls

Again, ghouls

I clearly remember that one, and they were all ghouls.

You say that as if it should somehow make murder all right. It begs the question: so what? So what if they're ghouls?

We can't really know if they were innocent, can we? As far as we know, they could have had resisted arrest or something like that.

No, we can't. Vice versa, we can't know if they have done anything that warrants death or labour camps, and I hardly think the burden of evidence falls on the accused, but rather on the accuser. Should we automatically assume that because someone was shot by the Enclave, they must have done something bad, because the Enclave is good? That is circular logic, and non-falsifiable.

And even if they had done something, on whose authority does the Enclave dole out sentences?

The Enclave is not the legitimate government, as that government ceased to be 200 years ago. I don't know where you are from, but I surmise that you would not be happy if your country all of a sudden was invaded by external forces, who believed they had a right to govern it, because they had done so before the current state of affairs hundreds of years ago. It would be equivalent of the UK taking over the government of the United States, just because America used to be a British colony. That time has passed, and likewise the U.S. no longer exists in any recognizable form in Fallout. The Enclave has no legitimate right to rule.

All governments have to start (in this case, re-start) from some point, haven't they? It's a sad fact, but force is usually the way to get and hold power. I assure you any current government in the world exists now because they've used force to get and hold power at some point.

Oh, you assure me? I don't know about you, but I live in a democracy, and I would not be so presumptious as you to comment on all current governments in the entire world.

But all these points are moot, and I tire of debating with blind and deaf people; I don't mean you, NT8, necessarily, but the entirety of this thread has made me nauseous, especially those comments that defended genocide in real life. Back when this interminable debate surfaced the last time, there were some Enclave fans that tried to persuade me that the Enclave fan club didn't hold these opinions in real life, and that they merely argued that the Enclave was neutral. I see now that they were mistaken. I find it really sad that there are people out there who defend genocide in real life, "because they are American" or because they as Socialists admire the Enclave's "realistic goals."

I thought we were merely debating a video game, and then it turns out that there are people, who would cheerfully support the Enclave's programme in real life. It makes me sad and makes me sick to see how far America has fallen, when views such as these can be disseminated. Remember what our fathers fought for on the beaches of Normandy.

I just pray to God that those rabid Enclave fans are a very small minority. To think a video game could bring out such nastiness in some people.

Max
User avatar
djimi
 
Posts: 3519
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 6:44 am

Post » Wed Aug 26, 2009 9:22 am

Wow, pretty pathetic, we're being called genocide-endorsers and nazis, because we like a certain faction in a GAME, sorry didn't think it was illegal to have a different viewpoint on a faction in a GAME, sorry if that offends you all. However it is just a GAME

edit: I only support the enclave, because its a game. If it was real (we're saying FO3 is real), then i'd join just to get fed clean food and clean water. They are sick people if it was real, but hey not all of them are evil, some just need to join to get fed for survival.
User avatar
SEXY QUEEN
 
Posts: 3417
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2007 7:54 pm

Post » Wed Aug 26, 2009 3:15 am

Wow... just wow.
User avatar
Sian Ennis
 
Posts: 3362
Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2006 11:46 am

Post » Tue Aug 25, 2009 9:46 pm

To me I find this topic quite intriguing .


I'll state my tart



The Enclave is a morally grey group of Elitist humans who have only the desire to rebuild America the way it was before the Great War
*there is nothing wrong with that

Their means are through genocide, for which it is to bring safety the future generations ALL around the world.
*would it be right for you to walk in to every prison in the would and exicute everyone who has every commited a cime?who are you to dicide when someone is to live and to die?

I myself am a Socialist, but I support the Enclave. WHY?

1. I don't support them because they are bad-ass. I support them because they have a realistic goal
*hitler had a realistic goal, he wanted to create a utopia, his means where trying to kill all others that were not like him.
2. Their means will benefit the future world. No more gangers/raiders/thief-like wastelanders/murderers/cannibals and so on would be eradicated.
* there is nothing wrong with wanting no more violance or robberys, but the answer isnt murder
3. Ghouls and Mutants have no rights. They are abominations unto themselves and should perish
*i already answered this one

And thus, I conclude genocide is a meritable use in the scenario the Enclave is stuck in.

my answers have a *
User avatar
BlackaneseB
 
Posts: 3431
Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2006 1:21 am

Post » Wed Aug 26, 2009 11:07 am

Wow, pretty pathetic, we're being called genocide-endorsers and nazis, because we like a certain faction in a GAME, sorry didn't think it was illegal to have a different viewpoint on a faction in a GAME, sorry if that offends you all. However it is just a GAME

It's a little late to pull the "it's just a game" card, when you yourself dragged real life into it by stating:

I am a full Enclave Fan :) They are the U.S. and I am American and 100% support them. Just like I do our troops in Iraq.


And then you went on to state:

They're trying to rebuild America, thats good enough for me.


So excuse us very much for thinking that you would support genocide in real life, when your posts seemed to suggest just that.

Your erstwhile colleague could also lead one to believe that you Enclave fans supported genocide in real life:

Their means are through genocide, for which it is to bring safety the future generations ALL around the world.


I myself am a Socialist, but I support the Enclave. WHY?

1. I don't support them because they are bad-ass. I support them because they have a realistic goal

2. Their means will benefit the future world. No more gangers/raiders/thief-like wastelanders/murderers/cannibals and so on would be eradicated.

3. Ghouls and Mutants have no rights. They are abominations unto themselves and should perish

And thus, I conclude genocide is a meritable use in the scenario the Enclave is stuck in.

I may be a little dim, but to me that sounds like real life, enthusiastic support for genocide, if the cause is the right one. I'm not the one labelling anyone genocidal maniacs. I'd say you boys do that fine by yourselves.
User avatar
Miss Hayley
 
Posts: 3414
Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 2:31 am

Post » Wed Aug 26, 2009 3:13 am

Wow, pretty pathetic, we're being called genocide-endorsers and nazis, because we like a certain faction in a GAME
* i just hate the "its just a game" arugment.


, sorry didn't think it was illegal to have a different viewpoint on a faction in a GAME
*no its isnt illegal,


, sorry if that offends you all. However it is just a GAME
*no it dosn't offend me


edit: I only support the enclave, because its a game. If it was real (we're saying FO3 is real), then i'd join just to get fed clean food and clean water. They are sick people if it was real, but hey not all of them are evil, some just need to join to get fed for survival.

*see i am saying all this because people are trying to justify what the enclave are doing in the game. im not calling you hitlor because you join the enclave, im not calling anyone hitlor or a nazi, i am comparing the enclave and what they do, to hitlor and the nazi's. and i am trying to get people to give me a logical reason for what they are doing.

User avatar
Charlie Sarson
 
Posts: 3445
Joined: Thu May 17, 2007 12:38 pm

Post » Wed Aug 26, 2009 8:57 am

I predict a lock.
User avatar
Hannah Whitlock
 
Posts: 3485
Joined: Sat Oct 07, 2006 12:21 am

Post » Wed Aug 26, 2009 4:53 am

I predict a http://hotlineoncall.nationaljournal.com/train_old.jpg.
User avatar
Matt Fletcher
 
Posts: 3355
Joined: Mon Sep 24, 2007 3:48 am

Previous

Return to Fallout 3