Sure they are all about inclusion and choice.... So long as that is the way it was done in MW...... :thumbsup:
I think you are giving people too much credit here. Go into about any thread on this forum debating something and you'll see the exact same handful of people taking the "anti-Skyrim" position on every topic no matter what it is. Make a list of issues and we could pretty quickly and easily make a list of the folks who would go done the list and say "Skyrim did it wrong" on every single one of those issues no matter what they are.
Well I suppose you would put me on that list then.
But you would be wrong if you said I had an 'anti-Skyrim' position, I do not.
I am sceptical, I am critical. Especially after the disaster that was Oblivion.
I have, numerous times, pointed out things I am happy with, things I am looking forward to.
But when things happen that I do not agree with, I am vocal on that.
This is not an 'anti-Skyrim' position, it is the exact opposite.
Its wanting Skyrim to be the best game it can possibly be.
In my mind that means expanding on and building on previous installments, to make it even better.
To take it to the next level. To make the best RPG of a generation.
It does
not mean removing spellmaking, classes, birthsigns, attributes, armour slots, spell effects etc.