The DLC is like fallout : V - Skyrim

» Wed Aug 31, 2011 1:26 am

No. I'd much rather have storylines and such than 7 houses and Horse Armor.

This

Edit: I personally hated Knights of the Nine took to long to those stupid shrines!

» Wed Aug 31, 2011 8:24 am

depends

you talking point lookout or old world blues like dlc

or

crappy mothership zeta ,operation anchorage , or dead money like dlc

or middle of the road honest hearts or the pitt

the first type definitely
second time NO!
the third type maybe

» Wed Aug 31, 2011 2:45 am

Why should we have to pay for DLCs. We paid for the game! Im all for DLCs but not ripping off the player

» Wed Aug 31, 2011 1:08 am

depends

you talking point lookout or old world blues like dlc

or

crappy mothership zeta ,operation anchorage , or dead money like dlc

or middle of the road honest hearts or the pitt

the first type definitely
second time NO!
the third type maybe

I considered Operation Anchorage to be one of the must-have DLCs for Fallout... couldn't wear power-armor otherwise.

» Wed Aug 31, 2011 11:18 am

depends which oblivion dlc's, i prefered kotn and Si to any fallout dlc. I don't think they should keep trying to make skyrim into fallout, somethings are good, some not so much

» Wed Aug 31, 2011 8:54 am

If they aren't fully fledged expansions with clearly new content, but content that seems to be cut out from the original game, I'm going to be very grumpy.

» Wed Aug 31, 2011 6:28 am

If they are like Fallout DLC I'll probably pass. I passed on all the New Vegas DLC. If it's something like Shivering Isles, I'll definitely get it. Not interested in paying for a short storyline set in a "pocket world" region that I'll never visit again.

» Wed Aug 31, 2011 5:01 am

Why should we have to pay for DLCs. We paid for the game! Im all for DLCs but not ripping off the player

Yes, why should we have to pay Bethesda for re-hiring voice-actors after their initial content to add the new dialogue required for the DLC, and the time invested by the developers after they released the game to add new content after the original game's released.

» Wed Aug 31, 2011 1:34 pm

If it took you longer than 3 hours to complete NotN, you're doing it wrong.

» Wed Aug 31, 2011 8:26 am

Maybe I'm missing something, but what's the difference between the two? I mean, DLC is DLC. Only difference I saw between them was than Fallout's DLC took place in the Fallout universe and OB's DLC took lace in TES universe.

» Wed Aug 31, 2011 6:43 am

Todd said the opposite a while back and said they wanted it to be larger expansions...but we'll see

» Wed Aug 31, 2011 1:18 pm

Ideally, just one or two large expansions .

» Wed Aug 31, 2011 2:10 am

I think the poll is not really fair.
Should be like this:

-Small Oblivion DLC
-Fallout DLC
-Oblivion Expansion Packs

I voted for Oblivion because it had expansion packs, but I know most people vote for Fallout because of the small DLC's Oblivion had.

» Wed Aug 31, 2011 9:45 am

Yes, why should we have to pay Bethesda for re-hiring voice-actors after their initial content to add the new dialogue required for the DLC, and the time invested by the developers after they released the game to add new content after the original game's released.

I bought Left 4 Dead 2 and got all the DLCs for free, same with Call of Duty:World at War.