Skyrim preferences to content.

Post » Tue Sep 13, 2011 11:45 pm

So I had started a topic here http://www.gamesas.com/index.php?/topic/1229774-skyrim-world-size/ it basically just tells of what the world will probably feel like. You can kind of get the idea from the map markers and looking at the map.

I decided to start a new one but this time with a nice poll to get the general public's preference on what they would rather have in a game like this.

so have at it.

And sorry I'm a nub when it comes to actually putting these topics up still in this forum so I couldn't find an add a poll button to the last topic I tried or I wouldn't have made this one.

Again sorry for the minor annoyance
User avatar
Keeley Stevens
 
Posts: 3398
Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 6:04 pm

Post » Wed Sep 14, 2011 5:43 am

My usual gripe, turn off POI markers, the world just seems bigger, and you can put plenty of content without it feeling crowded. It's very simple, if stuff is harder to find, you can put more in the same size of map.
User avatar
Bethany Watkin
 
Posts: 3445
Joined: Sun Jul 23, 2006 4:13 pm

Post » Wed Sep 14, 2011 1:42 am

I trust Bethesda to be able to judge the right ratio far better than I trust a lot of forumites who think they know best. Keep it as it is, please. Big world (no matter what people may seem to think, I guarantee you Skyrim will be enormous) with plenty of content.
User avatar
Danger Mouse
 
Posts: 3393
Joined: Sat Oct 07, 2006 9:55 am

Post » Tue Sep 13, 2011 2:51 pm

My usual gripe, turn off POI markers, the world just seems bigger, and you can put plenty of content without it feeling crowded. It's very simple, if stuff is harder to find, you can put more in the same size of map.



Yeah they should add a feature to pick and choose which POI you wish to show like caves/dungeons/towns/cities/ etc etc
User avatar
Bryanna Vacchiano
 
Posts: 3425
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 9:54 pm

Post » Tue Sep 13, 2011 7:12 pm

I don't see how bigger map size means less content. I'd prefer a map many times bigger, with the same amount of gameplay content but just more spread out. More distances between cities, more wilderness to get lost in.
User avatar
Erich Lendermon
 
Posts: 3322
Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2007 4:20 pm

Post » Tue Sep 13, 2011 7:26 pm

Even though I was expecting a larger map than Oblivion, I'm ok with it as is.
User avatar
Richus Dude
 
Posts: 3381
Joined: Fri Jun 16, 2006 1:17 am

Post » Wed Sep 14, 2011 3:53 am

A smaller map with more content would just be silly. You wouldn't be able to move for dungeons, towns and cities.
User avatar
Jessie Butterfield
 
Posts: 3453
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 5:59 pm

Post » Tue Sep 13, 2011 9:23 pm

Oblivion felt a little too crowded, there was a new dungeon around every corner. I'd rather have the same amount of content in a somewhat larger world.
User avatar
Chloe Botham
 
Posts: 3537
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 12:11 am

Post » Wed Sep 14, 2011 1:32 am

A larger map with the same content as there is now. Oblivion felt crowded already and they claim to have even more content in Skyrim. I want to get lost in a dark forest, I want to climb a huge mountain. With a map of Oblivion's size and even more content that won't be possible. The Great Forest in Oblivion was a tiny grove and every 20 seconds another 'You have found location X' message would pop up. In Skyrim it will most likely be worse. Sure, it will never get boring since you will always find something to look at no matter where you go. That's great for people with a low attention span. But the landscape will feel relatively small and jammed together. I don't need to find a new location and quest every minute if I fight my way through a deep, atmospheric forest.

EDIT: So my vote is 4x the map size (which can be done realistically, 16x would be even better of course), same content as there is now.

EDIT2: And the poll is a bit weird. Do you mean content relative to size or total content? I think most people assume total content when they choose. No one wants less content, but I think many people would like to see it more spread out. Making the landscape bigger without adding more content wouldn't be that hard. Making the landscape bigger while still keeping the content per sqm the same would be unrealistic of course.
User avatar
Sarah Kim
 
Posts: 3407
Joined: Tue Aug 29, 2006 2:24 pm

Post » Wed Sep 14, 2011 12:00 am

The right ratio of content for me is not in your poll. I want 2xContent and 10xSize.

Yes, I wanna travel with my horse and have to plan my trips. I want to travel between two cities in 15 minutes real time, on horse.
User avatar
Killah Bee
 
Posts: 3484
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2007 12:23 pm

Post » Wed Sep 14, 2011 12:00 am

Your poll is terrible.

I want 30,000 time the content and 3 million times the landmass. Because they were too lazy to do this, I hate them. And everyone.
User avatar
Rudi Carter
 
Posts: 3365
Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2006 11:09 pm

Post » Wed Sep 14, 2011 2:19 am

...
if theres 1x content and 2x map size, what does that mean to you guys?

I mean, how do you measure the content?
User avatar
sarah taylor
 
Posts: 3490
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 3:36 pm

Post » Tue Sep 13, 2011 2:19 pm

I don't see how bigger map size means less content. I'd prefer a map many times bigger, with the same amount of gameplay content but just more spread out. More distances between cities, more wilderness to get lost in.

Could not have worded it better. I agree with every word ^_^
User avatar
Leonie Connor
 
Posts: 3434
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2007 4:18 pm

Post » Tue Sep 13, 2011 10:14 pm

Your poll is terrible.

I want 30,000 time the content and 3 million times the landmass. Because they were too lazy to do this, I hate them. And everyone.


:biggrin: Ladies and gentlemen, we have a winner.
User avatar
Charlotte Buckley
 
Posts: 3532
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 11:29 am

Post » Tue Sep 13, 2011 8:32 pm

I don't see how bigger map size means less content. I'd prefer a map many times bigger, with the same amount of gameplay content but just more spread out. More distances between cities, more wilderness to get lost in.

Exactly :goodjob: The only thing is they need more man power to do more of everything in the same period of time, supposing all the dungeons, cities, natural points of interest are handcrafted and not generated or copy/pasted.
User avatar
D IV
 
Posts: 3406
Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2006 1:32 am

Post » Tue Sep 13, 2011 8:52 pm

Exactly :goodjob: The only thing is they need more man power to do more of everything in the same period of time, supposing all the dungeons, cities, natural points of interest are handcrafted and not generated or copy/pasted.


No, they only need more people (or take more time) to make more wilderness. The amount of dungeons, cities, points of interests should stay the same.
User avatar
Theodore Walling
 
Posts: 3420
Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2007 12:48 pm

Post » Tue Sep 13, 2011 9:44 pm

I am satisfied with the current level of content, I want a bigger map keeping the same level.
User avatar
Charlie Sarson
 
Posts: 3445
Joined: Thu May 17, 2007 12:38 pm


Return to V - Skyrim