Ok so when I saw IGN's 'Dark Souls will eat skyrim's face off' article I was soooo angry. First point they did and the most pointless : Multiplayer. Stating that Dark Souls will have multiplayer where Skyrim doesn't have any type of multiplayer at all. Take CoD for example, it's single player campaign isn't bad at all but when it comes to it's multiplayer... it svcks svcks and svcks.. it's multiplayer can be summed up by two words :
Mindless Killing. Now when I play a game, I play to experience a truly unique gaming experience, not to pass some time "pure fun" killing, dying, spawning and start from square one again. I can honestly say that I only played multiplayer in game once and I will never ever again. Companies that dumb down the single player experience just to make a multiplayer part of the game are dead to me. I know RAGE will have multiplayer, but at least it's not mandatory (as in a big part of the game), it's Single Player mode is RAGE's focus and heard the multiplayer part of the game is on another disc or something, we shall see.
A year ago or so there was an article that said that those who do not play multiplayer are not true gamers. This is my response to them : True gamers are those gamers that played the good old first RPGs like Planescape : Torment and Baldur's Gate on PCs, where PC gaming was just getting started. I remember booting up Planescape : Torment on my 64MB RAM PC.
Stupid Multiplayer does not make you a true gamer, it was something that became sort-of mandatory for games to have it in recently, which is in my opinion very very stupid.
When I hear players demanding Multiplayer in Skyrim, it gets me soo angry. That would be the true end of a dying breed, the breed of the supermassive epicly single player games like the games Bethesda develops!
I thank you Bethesda, for staying true to your roots and not give up on Single Player. Leave that to $hitinityward.