In Depth - The state of the UK

Post » Fri Sep 04, 2009 10:42 am

But a radio was quite rare you know :P
User avatar
Lady Shocka
 
Posts: 3452
Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2006 10:59 pm

Post » Fri Sep 04, 2009 2:02 am

I doubt NATO still existed by 2077, though. quote

I feel as if there would have been a greater need for NATO during the great war.

If China invaded alaska Canada then all NATO Members WOULD have been summoned to liberate alaska.


hmm just thinking, annex doesnt mean invade does it? surely that would have been an infringment of NATO agreements

on America's behalf!? lol


ummm the U.N. disbanded as the loading screen and nato is the U.N.s coalition if im correct
User avatar
M!KkI
 
Posts: 3401
Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2006 7:50 am

Post » Fri Sep 04, 2009 3:04 pm

ummm the U.N. disbanded as the loading screen and nato is the U.N.s coalition if im correct

You are not sir. NATO and the UN are quite separate international organisations. I think I am correct in saying that all NATO members are also members of the UN, and I know I am correct in saying not all UN members are members of NATO.

NATO was established as a western European counterpoint to the Warsaw Pact, dominated by the USSR. In Fallout's case, China is 'the other', not the USSR, so NATO would have waning relevance.
User avatar
Veronica Flores
 
Posts: 3308
Joined: Mon Sep 11, 2006 5:26 pm

Post » Fri Sep 04, 2009 5:33 am

NATO was established as a western European counterpoint to the Warsaw Pact, dominated by the USSR. In Fallout's case, China is 'the other', not the USSR, so NATO would have waning relevance.


If NATO did exist (as it probably did at some point in the fallout world, as it was created in 1949), my understandng is the basic idea with NATO is an attack on one would be considered an attack on all.

Edit: Quoting Wikipedia, which quotes the treaty:

The Parties of NATO agreed that an armed attack against one or more of them in Europe or North America shall be considered an attack against them all. Consequently they agree that, if such an armed attack occurs, each of them, in exercise of the right of individual or collective self-defence will assist the Party or Parties being attacked, individually and in concert with the other Parties, such action as it deems necessary, including the use of armed force, to restore and maintain the security of the North Atlantic area


Assuming the treaty was still in force, China invading the US would therefore be considered an attack on all NATO countries - Whats left the European allies, and also Canada. Since Canada showed some reluctance to allow troops to pass through its territory before 2076, I think its unlikely that NATO existed at this point.

If it did, in 2076 it would have had to have broken down - The US Annexed Canada, itself an act of war, in theory forcing the rest of NATO to declare war on the US.
User avatar
willow
 
Posts: 3414
Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2006 9:43 pm

Post » Fri Sep 04, 2009 4:11 am

If NATO did exist (as it probably did at some point in the fallout world, as it was created in 1949), my understandng is the basic idea with NATO is an attack on one would be considered an attack on all.

Edit: Quoting Wikipedia, which quotes the treaty:



Assuming the treaty was still in force, China invading the US would therefore be considered an attack on all NATO countries - Whats left the European allies, and also Canada. Since Canada showed some reluctance to allow troops to pass through its territory before 2076, I think its unlikely that NATO existed at this point.

If it did, in 2076 it would have had to have broken down - The US Annexed Canada, itself an act of war, in theory forcing the rest of NATO to declare war on the US.

Not sure why you're quoting me, since I was just clarifying what NATO was as opposed to arguing its existence in Fallout. Fallout divergence occurs just after WWII, so it is conceivable that NATO does not exist in Fallout's world, however improbably. If it does, it is indeed obviously of no effect. We have no evidence that NATO protocols were enacted against China.
User avatar
Skivs
 
Posts: 3550
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2007 10:06 pm

Post » Fri Sep 04, 2009 12:03 am

I do not see a problem with the existance of NATO in a Fallout universe.

The US could have chosen (as they have before) to have a more isolationist policy. That could mean that the US withdrew from Nato but that the Euros consolidated the organisation.
User avatar
butterfly
 
Posts: 3467
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 8:20 pm

Post » Fri Sep 04, 2009 7:14 am

Well, for starters the London Eye wouldn't exist. Every time I go on a "fal0ut inglund l0l" thread someone is saying how much they'd love to live in the London Eye. Truth is it was built to celebrate the Millennium, now I'm not saying something wasn't built to celebrate the Millennium in the FO universe, but the London EYE WOULD NOT EXIST. End of. A popular tourist attraction in London in the 50's was the Dome of Discovery, which was very, very close to the site of where The London Eye is today. [/Rant]

Also, Our monarchy would remain intact no matter what system our Government decided to join. Our royal family has no real power and is really just for show, we'd never give it up.
User avatar
Vicki Blondie
 
Posts: 3408
Joined: Fri Jun 16, 2006 5:33 am

Post » Fri Sep 04, 2009 2:46 pm

I think Starvation would be the U.K.s worst enemy after a nuclear war, as it would be all over the planet. However I think the UK's island stature - which protected them for centuries from foreign invasion - would now become as a prison cell with no food provided. With so many people in the UK as compared to its land mass, it can no longer feed itself via its own resources - and after war I think that would take more lives than Fallout and radiation (it kills alot faster than the Fallout-radiation most people would get too).

Miax
User avatar
rae.x
 
Posts: 3326
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 2:13 pm

Post » Fri Sep 04, 2009 3:23 am

I think the isles would have to be in very bad shape if
Spoiler
Tenpenny and Moriarty's dad
thought it was a good idea to try and cross a vast irradiated ocean to get to America. Keep in mind, according to Fallout 1, Europe "descended into quarreling, bickering nation-states" and there's the whole Resource Wars angle too. Europe and the Middle East are bound to be even worse off than the US and China.
User avatar
vanuza
 
Posts: 3522
Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2006 11:14 pm

Post » Fri Sep 04, 2009 12:09 pm

The UK currently relies heavily on imported food to support its populace, if Europe was the reduced to bickering states the imports would dry up and a vast amount of the UK population would starve to death. Although after the population reached a level where it could support itself the UK was probably a fairly stable region varying based on the degree to which it was hit with WMDs.

EDIT: Also i expect China would have been in the worst situation after the bombs dropped, considering how it was ravaged beforehand by T51b strike teams and hordes of Wanamingos that practically consumed their whole ecosystem.
User avatar
Connie Thomas
 
Posts: 3362
Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2006 9:58 am

Post » Fri Sep 04, 2009 5:08 am

The UK currently relies heavily on imported food to support its populace, if Europe was the reduced to bickering states the imports would dry up and a vast amount of the UK population would starve to death. Although after the population reached a level where it could support itself the UK was probably a fairly stable region varying based on the degree to which it was hit with WMDs.

The UK can in fact, support itself for food, but there are daft people in charge who prevent this. The unfortunate thing is, as soon as a nuclear war and collapse of globalism happens, the soil will be too irradiated to support more than a few million. Hell, with the resource wars, subsistence farming may already have become common, but being nuked would certainly put crop yields back before medieval levels.

I imagine that Europe is like the watelands of DC, but with nothing like the Vaults, Enclave or the Brotherhood. Something akin to Rivet city might be the best you'd get, but most Europeans would probably think megaton was heaven.
User avatar
Alba Casas
 
Posts: 3478
Joined: Tue Dec 12, 2006 2:31 pm

Post » Fri Sep 04, 2009 4:44 am

The UK can in fact, support itself for food, but there are daft people in charge who prevent this. The unfortunate thing is, as soon as a nuclear war and collapse of globalism happens, the soil will be too irradiated to support more than a few million. Hell, with the resource wars, subsistence farming may already have become common, but being nuked would certainly put crop yields back before medieval levels.

I imagine that Europe is like the watelands of DC, but with nothing like the Vaults, Enclave or the Brotherhood. Something akin to Rivet city might be the best you'd get, but most Europeans would probably think megaton was heaven.

Is it even known whether Europe got nuked or was it between the USA and China?
User avatar
IM NOT EASY
 
Posts: 3419
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2007 10:48 pm

Post » Fri Sep 04, 2009 8:19 am

As a british person I cannot explain how proud I am of the empire we created based on fair trade and occasional bloodshed. All the greatstuff we gave the world like football and cricket.

But.... UK is nothing these days we would have been wiped. No one here even feels british anymore its full of immigrants..All about Australia's policy's on immagration.

Former glory at around 1950's time:


http://web000.greece.k12.ny.us/SocialStudiesResources/Social_Studies_Resources/GHG_Documents/British%20Empire%201910%20Map%2001.03.jpg

When i was little I could never get my head around how small England was and how big her empire was!!

Be proud America! you were once part of the LARGEST Empire ever on Earth!

Some say the British Empire never fell, it just changed continents (Americans).

FALLOUT 4 UK!!!!!!

Oh and dont get it twisted MONGOLS had largest single land mass which leads to the assumption they had the biggest

But GB had the largest In terms of size spreadout in the world.

And yes I beleive alot of British Navy would have survived a nuclear holocaust because of how far apart it was spread.


I smell a BNP member.

The proudest fact of American history is that we stuck it to you and your dirty king in the 18th century and never looked back.

But this is all irrelevant as England (YEAH I SAID IT,) will never be the focus of a Fallout game. Because Fallout is 100% American. GOD BLESS THE USA, AND NOWHERE ELSE!
User avatar
I love YOu
 
Posts: 3505
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 12:05 pm

Post » Fri Sep 04, 2009 4:59 am

Closed for review.

This keeps getting dragged up, and with this final post quoting a 9 month old post I am going to leave this closed so it can now quietly disappear down the forum.
User avatar
Tyrone Haywood
 
Posts: 3472
Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2007 7:10 am

Previous

Return to Fallout Series Discussion