» Mon Oct 03, 2011 10:00 am
Depends on how they're done.
Fallout New Vegas is the first game I've played where I can honestly say I felt like I got my money's worth when I bought the DLCs, and wasn't just buying the DLCs out of a need to get the "complete" game. I straight up wanted them.
But that's only one fairly recent game that's done it right. All other DLCs I've played have felt like a downgrade from an expansion.
So Expansion, preferably, but if they must do DLCs (which they will, because it seems more profitable), please take a lesson from the DLCs of New Vegas.
Give the DLCs actual meaning and make them tie into the main game, not just "OH WOW UR CHARACTER GOT TRICKED/KIDNAPPED/ABDUCTED FOR THE HUNDRETH TIME DESPITE BEING A VERY EXPERIENCED WARRIOR AND TOTAL BADASS HOW ABOUT THAT, well, guess he'll just have to fight his way out of this area that has absolutely nothing to do with the original setting, almost to the point where you'd think the original setting has ceased to exist!"