» Mon Nov 28, 2011 9:46 pm
I played the campaign of battlefield 3 and wasn't surprised.
It's the second time I play a battlefield game, I like much more the graphics of crysis, these are more realistic, in BF3 it seems to walk on a picture.
Also the gameplay didn't surprised me at all, I heard a lot about this game and thought WOOOWW it must be genial, but it's not at all. in my opinion... maybe I'll start to like it later.
I liked much more the campaign of medal of honor, game that hasn't recieved very good votes in the reviews but I think it's very realistic, more than bf3, and the graphics in my opinion are also more true. Yes the texture have a higher detail in bf3, but as it is now it seemed to me to watch a painting, an the opposite than in MOH the dust comed out of the floor, the explosions where took part with the rest, as everything else.
But I think I would generally like better a game with more adrenaline, i get used to take what's thrown on the market and the rest stays forgotten. I talk about flight simulators, action space simulators, like wing commander prophecy.
in any case I really hope that the crysis2 dosn't stop here. The graphics are really amazing!