Battlefield 3's frostbite 2 better than cryengine 3 .(VIDEO)

Post » Mon Nov 28, 2011 11:56 pm

to all you who want to enjoy a realistic game,
here is a proof of how well frostbite 2 works,


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l1q_uDBohLY


PS: i got tired of waiting from crytek!!!
User avatar
butterfly
 
Posts: 3467
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 8:20 pm

Post » Tue Nov 29, 2011 12:27 am

I still prefer Crysis 2 for graphics over BF3 - not that BF3 doesn't look great.

I have a feeling I would prefer the MP game in BF3 due to the greater depth and scale of the maps. I am a massive BF fan so it's unfortunate that EA decided to lump in some adware/spyware crap with the game. Though I now know there is a way to play the game without that ****. I will have to see if I can get Punkbuster games working on Windows 8 DP and I might consider a purchase.
User avatar
leni
 
Posts: 3461
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 3:58 pm

Post » Mon Nov 28, 2011 10:01 pm

Jac70, origin had **** up bf3 but despite that,
I think is a great game, get it for pc if u plan
To buy it, i really recommend u.
I used to like crysis 2 but its customer service
Made me think otherwise.
If u ever get the game, maybe we can meet at the
BATTLEFIELD.....someday.
User avatar
Kristian Perez
 
Posts: 3365
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 3:03 am

Post » Tue Nov 29, 2011 2:50 am

Still doesn't look as realistic as ArmA 3 (yes BF3 looks good but the colours are totally inaccurate)
User avatar
Heather Dawson
 
Posts: 3348
Joined: Sun Oct 15, 2006 4:14 pm

Post » Tue Nov 29, 2011 5:54 am

M4dn3ss, nothing that a patch can't fix...
User avatar
Vickey Martinez
 
Posts: 3455
Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2007 5:58 am

Post » Mon Nov 28, 2011 10:10 pm

BF3 still does not meet up my invision of what a technological soldier should be. A C2 nanosuit soldier would own a BF3 soldier all day long.
User avatar
Sophie Miller
 
Posts: 3300
Joined: Sun Jun 18, 2006 12:35 am

Post » Tue Nov 29, 2011 4:03 am

M4dn3ss, nothing that a patch can't fix...
They won't fix it. That's how they like the art style.

Besides, you don't have to make threads about BF3 because basically everyone's heard of it and they all know something about it. No point telling someone something they already know
User avatar
Stat Wrecker
 
Posts: 3511
Joined: Mon Sep 24, 2007 6:14 am

Post » Mon Nov 28, 2011 10:34 pm

Thanks for the video. BF3 certainly has some nice graphics, however this video just seems to underscore that it is still slightly behind Cryengine 3. One should not judge graphics just from one video though, and should actually play the games to form a truly informed opinion.

Having played both games myself, I can say that Crysis 2 IMO still comes out consistently ahead in terms of visuals, even though there were some parts of BF3 which came close to competing.
User avatar
Jessie Rae Brouillette
 
Posts: 3469
Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 9:50 am

Post » Mon Nov 28, 2011 9:57 pm

Cars destruction in C2 is more detailed and better. In C1 trees are better. Water rendering in C2 I like more than in BF3 (but best water rendering I've ever seen was in Resident Evil 5) and also I like enemies animation in C2 more. The rest in BF3 is better than in C2.
User avatar
Cheville Thompson
 
Posts: 3404
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 2:33 pm


Return to Crysis