continuation games

Post » Wed Dec 07, 2011 9:04 am

hey id like to see the continuation of a FO game like a NV2 where you can get your save transfered over so you still have all your money and wepons and perks just put your level cap up to 100

wat do you think?????? :)
User avatar
Jynx Anthropic
 
Posts: 3352
Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2006 9:36 pm

Post » Wed Dec 07, 2011 3:08 pm

I think its stupid. :down:

There is so much of the Fallout Universe left unseen. As much as I love New Vegas, I don't want to go back to the Mojave and continue with the story. To have New Vegas 2 where we can just take our character and our stuff from New Vegas over to it, would be a waste of a Fallout Game, IMO. The game would have to account for all the endings of New Vegas, and there are alot of endings. So there would have to be a story to reflect very one of those endings. This isn't Mass Effect.
User avatar
Roanne Bardsley
 
Posts: 3414
Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2006 9:57 am

Post » Wed Dec 07, 2011 11:31 pm

I think its stupid. :down:



Yep, that sums up my thoughts as well.
User avatar
Your Mum
 
Posts: 3434
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 6:23 pm

Post » Wed Dec 07, 2011 8:46 pm

I love F:NV but a F:NV2? No, no way.
User avatar
Scotties Hottie
 
Posts: 3406
Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2006 1:40 am

Post » Thu Dec 08, 2011 12:57 am

I think that the events of FNV should be addressed in FO4, but that's the extent of it.
User avatar
Eileen Collinson
 
Posts: 3208
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 2:42 am

Post » Wed Dec 07, 2011 11:17 am

What would be the point of starting a new game if your already practically invincible?
User avatar
Adrian Morales
 
Posts: 3474
Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2007 3:19 am

Post » Wed Dec 07, 2011 9:42 am

What would be the point of starting a new game if your already invincible?


Fixed ^

Its so they don't have to go through the trouble of role playing and making a new character. They can just start the game as the Incredible Hulk aka GOD and start shooting :gun:
User avatar
barbara belmonte
 
Posts: 3528
Joined: Fri Apr 06, 2007 6:12 pm

Post » Wed Dec 07, 2011 10:37 am

nope bad Idea, however what I do want is them to stop jumping so far ahead in the timeline. Keep the same years but move to new locations so we can get a good feel of whats the situation is like over a wider area.
User avatar
Jaki Birch
 
Posts: 3379
Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 3:16 am

Post » Wed Dec 07, 2011 12:15 pm

nope bad Idea, however what I do want is them to stop jumping so far ahead in the timeline. Keep the same years but move to new locations so we can get a good feel of whats the situation is like over a wider area.


My thoughts exactly.

By the way, when did Bethesda announce the "we won't go back in the timeline" policy and what was the reasoning behind it? Something I've been wondering.
User avatar
Je suis
 
Posts: 3350
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2007 7:44 pm


Return to Fallout Series Discussion