Because I never had anything else to compare it to, it WAS the best available. Not just what was available to me.
What you're doing is the same as comparing the experience of watching a war film, against actually being there.
What you're doing is the same as comparing the experience of watching a war film, against actually being there.
This is probably the stupidest post I've ever read.
You're trying to say that I'm a spoiled gamer from the current generation that doesn't appreciate games like Skyrim as "towering achievements" because I didn't have to be stuck with old 2D adventure games where you had to type in your actions, or games where you didn't even have a picture - you just had a description of what was in front of you and the option to type something like "Turn East."
Well, guess what? I did! I had those games! I lived those games for the majority of my life! I didn't get a good gaming rig until roughly six years ago! I didn't get a PS3 until last year! All these new, flashy games? They're pretty damn new to me. And you know what? For as GOOD as Skyrim is - it's not as groundbreaking as Arena was. It's not as groundbreaking as Morrowind was. It's about as groundbreaking as Oblivion was, which is to say, not groundbreaking at all.
I'll say this one last time
Skyrim is a fantastic game, and I really love it. I'm going to put a lot of hours into it. BUT: it is not a game-changing game that will alter the course of video games. It's a pretty standard, cookie cutter Open-World-RPG. It has been done before.