[ Poll ] Should we be able to attack on a Horse?

Post » Sun Dec 11, 2011 8:59 pm

Hello all, im performing this pool because i sick of get my horse dead on dragon battles :|


Also, we could have more than one ring =)
User avatar
Anna Beattie
 
Posts: 3512
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 4:59 am

Post » Sun Dec 11, 2011 1:32 pm

I thought this was a pool. You lied.
User avatar
ladyflames
 
Posts: 3355
Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2006 9:45 am

Post » Sun Dec 11, 2011 7:19 pm

Yes and yes, cannot wait for the mod that allows attack from a horse.
User avatar
Amanda Leis
 
Posts: 3518
Joined: Sun Dec 24, 2006 1:57 am

Post » Sun Dec 11, 2011 2:29 pm

I thought this was a pool. You lied.



Ops.. Sorry my english :facepalm:
User avatar
Jason King
 
Posts: 3382
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 2:05 pm

Post » Sun Dec 11, 2011 6:12 pm

Yes, but I really don't consider it a massive priority given the layout of Skyrim's world. Things such as acrobatics and climbing seem like much more glaring omissions.

As for rings, yes. At the very least, I think we should be able to have one per hand.
User avatar
Sheila Reyes
 
Posts: 3386
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 7:40 am

Post » Sun Dec 11, 2011 11:01 pm

Ops.. Sorry my english :facepalm:



fail. its ok i didnt bring my swimwear
User avatar
Michael Russ
 
Posts: 3380
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2007 3:33 am

Post » Sun Dec 11, 2011 12:27 pm

Before they add something new they better add First person horse
User avatar
Naazhe Perezz
 
Posts: 3393
Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2006 6:14 am

Post » Mon Dec 12, 2011 4:40 am

YES, to both. I've been complaining since Oblivion about the horse combat. The ring thing I could care less about.
User avatar
Amy Melissa
 
Posts: 3390
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 2:35 pm

Post » Mon Dec 12, 2011 4:00 am

YES! gdi... YES! ... cant tell you how much of a hassle it is to haaaaaaaaaavee to get off the damn horse just to kill those damn wolves or else my horse go bai bai.
User avatar
Cedric Pearson
 
Posts: 3487
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2007 9:39 pm

Post » Sun Dec 11, 2011 7:55 pm

I voted yes for horses even though I don't use them.

I voted yes for rings but there would have to be some restriction on them. I know enchanting is supposed to be bad as it is but no need to get crazy.
User avatar
Kitana Lucas
 
Posts: 3421
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 1:24 pm

Post » Sun Dec 11, 2011 7:18 pm

Yes to both. Horses will never be worth the development time spent on them if there is no way to defend yourself while on a horse.
User avatar
LADONA
 
Posts: 3290
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2007 3:52 am

Post » Mon Dec 12, 2011 1:25 am

Yes to both. Horses will never be worth the development time spent on them if there is no way to defend yourself while on a horse.



No way to defend yourself while on a horse?

Image how awesome is you using your bow with time slow when mouting a horse thru giants, or kiting a dragon? Or smashing an bandit skull with a mace, or choppin' a head off with a sword with a slow motion animation ( like happens sometimes )

That would be so epic
User avatar
Hot
 
Posts: 3433
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2007 6:22 pm

Post » Sun Dec 11, 2011 3:39 pm

I never use a horse, but I can definitely agree to an attack function from a horse! good idea.
The ring issue I also heavily agree to. I mean.. the character classes all have 10 fingers, right? Only being able to wear one ring is lame.
User avatar
saxon
 
Posts: 3376
Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2007 2:45 am

Post » Mon Dec 12, 2011 4:05 am

I used to have a horse, until it took a Stormcloak to the knee.
User avatar
Blackdrak
 
Posts: 3451
Joined: Thu May 17, 2007 11:40 pm

Post » Sun Dec 11, 2011 6:26 pm

The horse idea is because its very bad everytime you want to combat you have to dismount... and pray to not get the horse killed...
User avatar
Lauren Graves
 
Posts: 3343
Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 6:03 pm

Post » Sun Dec 11, 2011 1:50 pm

No and no.

Never had horse back attack in a TES game and really don't need it IMO. Besides swinging a melee weapon on horseback will kill your horse more often than your attacker. Try it sometime.

I have to assume that with the changes made to Skyrim that Bethesda thought that having two rings may be overpowered. Maybe it is. Honestly I haven't used a ring yet, but that may be because I'm not enchanting my own 'super' rings ... which kinda brings me back to having two rings may be overpowered.
User avatar
xxLindsAffec
 
Posts: 3604
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 10:39 pm

Post » Sun Dec 11, 2011 5:08 pm

No and no.

Never had horse back attack in a TES game and really don't need it IMO. Besides swinging a melee weapon on horseback will kill your horse more often than your attacker. Try it sometime.

I have to assume that with the changes made to Skyrim that Bethesda thought that having two rings may be overpowered. Maybe it is. Honestly I haven't used a ring yet, but that may be because I'm not enchanting my own 'super' rings ... which kinda brings me back to having two rings may be overpowered.


You could fight from horseback in Daggerfall. I did it quite often.
User avatar
Phillip Hamilton
 
Posts: 3457
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 3:07 pm

Post » Sun Dec 11, 2011 6:14 pm

Epic Horse-mounted battles is (would be) Epic.
User avatar
Arnold Wet
 
Posts: 3353
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 10:32 am

Post » Sun Dec 11, 2011 3:47 pm

You could fight from horseback in Daggerfall. I did it quite often.


I do not remember that ... but it was a long time ago.
User avatar
Darian Ennels
 
Posts: 3406
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2007 2:00 pm

Post » Sun Dec 11, 2011 6:52 pm

I used to have a horse, until it took a Stormcloak to the knee.


Hahahahaha!!!!
User avatar
Keeley Stevens
 
Posts: 3398
Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 6:04 pm


Return to V - Skyrim