» Wed Dec 14, 2011 11:27 am I say dragons.
Deathclaws like to attack in packs, as previously mentioned. They also lack any form of ranged attack.
Notice how you never fight more than 2 dragons at once in Skyrim, and even that is a rare occasion. Try to take on 5+ elder/ancient dragons simultaneously, and say they're a joke.
Deathclaws like to attack in packs, as previously mentioned. They also lack any form of ranged attack.
Notice how you never fight more than 2 dragons at once in Skyrim, and even that is a rare occasion. Try to take on 5+ elder/ancient dragons simultaneously, and say they're a joke.
But why give Dragons special treatment?
If going by lore and gameplay Dragons attack at most 3 at once and that is REALLY rare.
Deathclaws, in all Fallouts apart from Fallout 3 (excluding Old Olney) attack in packs.
So yeah, they'd be screwed if up against 5+ Elder/Ancient Dragons.
But it'd be like saying "Yeah uhm, 10 Desert Rangers would be screwed against 10 Lanius'"
Just saying, no special treatment.
Deathclaws attack in packs, in lore and in gameplay, Dragons do not, they have rare moments where they attack 2 at once and even rarer 3 at once.
But Deathclaws "always" attack in packs.
Throw in a Mother Deathclaw and a Baby Deathclaw and the Mother would go completely insane once it's child dies.
Throw in an Alpha or Legendary Deathclaw (which we are allowed to do since we can throw in Ancient Dragons) then the scale is even heavier in the Deathclaws favor.
Dragons, because unless they are killed by a dovahkin they re-spawn.
They do?
Hm.
Well we are talking about who would win the battle right?
Even if a Dragon is capable of reincarnating back to itself it can still be killed temporarily by the Deathclaws.
