pyffi 3k

Post » Wed May 02, 2012 9:08 pm

Hi guys,
I haven't tried pyffi 3k, I wonder is it stable.
Are the files optimized by pyffi 3K better than those optimized by original pyffi?
User avatar
Emma
 
Posts: 3287
Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2006 12:51 am

Post » Wed May 02, 2012 11:40 pm

I'm a bit behind the times with Pyffi, still using 219 with Arthmoor's optimization kit, so am interested in this too. Also, how does it get along with the Python version of Wrye Bash. (I use the WR that requires Python to be installed rather than the 'stand-alone' version.)

-Decrepit-
User avatar
Cool Man Sam
 
Posts: 3392
Joined: Thu May 10, 2007 1:19 pm

Post » Thu May 03, 2012 3:23 am

I've tried it, and it seems to be about the same as 2.1.11. As far as Python compatibility... you'll have to keep separate Python installs (WB still relies on 2.8). I use the Python version of WB as well, and that's the main reason I just went back to 2.1.11.
User avatar
Joey Bel
 
Posts: 3487
Joined: Sun Jan 07, 2007 9:44 am

Post » Thu May 03, 2012 6:49 am

Decrepit--In another thread, Arthmoor has stated that the Oblivion_Optimize.BAT files that come with the latest PyFFIs (2.1.11 and 2.2.0, aka PyFFI3k) are better than the optimization kit that's available on TESNexus.
User avatar
Stephanie Nieves
 
Posts: 3407
Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2007 10:52 pm


Return to IV - Oblivion